Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Why no 30 x 9 drag radial ?? #1395791
03/01/13 10:28 PM
03/01/13 10:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline OP
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline OP
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I wonder why in the heck no one makes a 30 x 9 dot drag radial ?? I mean Hoosier makes the 30 x 9 x 15 radial slick for stock eliminator cars that have to run stock wheelwells. So why does no one make a 30 x 9 tire for street cars that run stock wheelwells ?? I have been running these Hoosier 30 x 9 radial slicks on the street for over 2 years because they fit great and dont rub at all in my 63's stock wheelwells. And they handle pretty good on the highway with my 225/70-15 radials up front. I would gladly use a dot draq radial but everytime you get a 30" tall drag radial they are at least 11" wide. And they will fit the wheelwell but rub way to much on turns so thats why I prefered the 9" wide tires. A 10" tire might work with the perfect offset but I like the 30" tall tire on my 63 as I like how it fills the wheelwell. So until someone make a 30 x 9 x 15 drag radial I will be driving and racing on these Hoosier 30 x 9 radial slicks ! And I will not cut on the car or tub it. Ron


Re: Why no 30 x 9 drag radial ?? [Re: 383man] #1395792
03/02/13 12:43 AM
03/02/13 12:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,002
Joplin, Mo
R
rt66jim Offline
master
rt66jim  Offline
master
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,002
Joplin, Mo
Ron, I know some have had success with radial slicks. But they proved a disaster for me. I tried all the things that were suggested. But my car would shake/vibrate horribly on them. If I recall correctly. MoparBilly had the same problem.

Perhaps if I'm wrong he will see this and correct me. Or offer his experience with them. Jim

Re: Why no 30 x 9 drag radial ?? [Re: 383man] #1395793
03/02/13 08:49 AM
03/02/13 08:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
M
MoparBilly Offline
master
MoparBilly  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
Ron,
I feel your frustration, Buddy! Looking at the tire charts, your current slick is 29.5 tall, 11.3 section width, and 9.0 tread. We ran a similar drag slick on my 67 Belvedere with no rubbing issues, but when we would switch to the 275/60/16 street tires my brother had on it, it would rub in corners, and when loaded. I didn't want to change tires on Drag Week 2012, so I went in search of a multi-purpose drag radial, and ran into exactly what you are talking about.
My first concern was no rubbing, so I settled for Mickey Thompson ET Street Drag radials in the 255/60 size. The section width of 10.1 and tread of 9.0 are great, but they are miserably short at only 27.1! The 275/60 MT's are 28 tall 11.0 section, and 9.5 tread, so technically they should fit anywhere a 30X9 slick would, but I have seen guys really struggle to get that tire under many stock tub Mopars. What we really need are Drag Radials in a 70 series, but controling that large of a sidewall seems to be a problem for them.

7609688-summer_027.JPG (47 downloads)

"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks" 4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
Re: Why no 30 x 9 drag radial ?? [Re: MoparBilly] #1395794
03/02/13 09:23 AM
03/02/13 09:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
M
MoparBilly Offline
master
MoparBilly  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
The 255/60 M/T ET Street Drag Radial performed flawlessly on Drag Week, as They drove through a torrential rain on I-40, and maintained speed. On the drag strip, it never turned a tire, but the 67 leaves really soft, and only went 11.58-116.

My Valiant takes a big tire no problem. On Drag Week 2011, I couldn't make the 315/60 Drag Radials work on the track, but they made the drive, even in rain, just fine. In 2012 I changed shocks on all four corners, and went with a bias-ply Et Street, which is basically a slick with a couple of squigly lines. Great on the track, and great on the drive...until we hit rain! Then they were completely unsafe at anything over 25 MPH!!!


"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks" 4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
Re: Why no 30 x 9 drag radial ?? [Re: MoparBilly] #1395795
03/02/13 09:26 AM
03/02/13 09:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline OP
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline OP
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
My cash is tight right now also and I need new tires. I could go to a 28 which should look ok in my rear wheelwell but then I would have to gear down as I dont want to run 28" tires with my 4.30's. Later when I get the cash I plan to drop to 4.10's or 3.91's and then 28's would be ok but it would still be better to stay with 30" tires even if I drop to 4.10's or 3.91's as with the 493's torque I dont think it would slow down as heck it might even go faster and would have a better cruising rpm. Right now with the 4.30's and the 30" tire I turn about 3200 rpm at 60 mph so I would love to drop to 3.91's and stay with the 30 inch tires. I really think it would still run 10.70's or maybe even go a tad faster as when I short shifted by mistake last time at the track it still ran a 10.83 with ease. I had accidently shifted to second about 5k as I usually shifted about 6000 to 6200 but like I said it really did not slow me at all as I was only running 10.80's that day in the heat at that track which I am usually a good 1/2 tenth slower at that track then the track I ran 10.70's at. But I cant afford both the tires and gears right now so I plan to get the 30 x 9 Hoosier radial slicks for now as I have a spare set of rims I could use to mount a dot tire later if I get the extra cash and gear down. I am seriously considering going to 3.91's. I wish I could try a 31" tire first and see how the car likes it as I can fit a 31" tall tire in the stock wheelwell. Thats another reason I like the B-body wheelwell over the Dart A-body small wheelwell I had when I owned my Dart. Ron


Last edited by 383man; 03/02/13 09:30 AM.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1