Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? #1245875
06/05/12 07:19 PM
06/05/12 07:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
ramcharger1964 Offline OP
member
ramcharger1964  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
Had it recommended by more than 1 person that I should ditch the cable throttle system on my max wedge crossrammed 64. They said for safety reasons - If somtheing happens and the throttle sticks, springs break, cable, snaps, etc. - then you can use your toe to manually pull the throttle back up.

Anyone use these or have pic's. Any manufacturers??


Hell B!tch Racing Co.
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: ramcharger1964] #1245876
06/05/12 07:42 PM
06/05/12 07:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
RodStRace Offline
I Live Here
RodStRace  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
There were many issues with stuck throttles on linkages. The engine mount would break and the engine would torque over, pulling the throttle open more.
Race cars are required to have redundant (2) throttle springs. You could even connect one to each carb and a third to the linkage, if you really want backup.
I would worry about the guys suggesting this, not changing your setup...

Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: ramcharger1964] #1245877
06/05/12 09:59 PM
06/05/12 09:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
I wouldn't switch to mechanical linkage with a crossram, NO STINKING WAY Make sure your cable is in good shape, take it off the car and feel the restitance when sliding it in and out, if it doesn't have any tight spots put it back on and run it If it has tight spots replace it with a good one that doesn't have sticky or tight spots


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: ramcharger1964] #1245878
06/05/12 10:25 PM
06/05/12 10:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
In real quick cars(dont know the ET) its a must to
have a mech linkage with a toe loop

Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: ramcharger1964] #1245879
06/06/12 06:33 AM
06/06/12 06:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
Quote:

Had it recommended by more than 1 person that I should ditch the cable throttle system on my max wedge crossrammed 64. They said for safety reasons - If somtheing happens and the throttle sticks, springs break, cable, snaps, etc. - then you can use your toe to manually pull the throttle back up.

Anyone use these or have pic's. Any manufacturers??




I did it on my 63 Dodge crossram. Pain in the but. Bigger hole in the firewall to make it have the correct geometry with the stock pedal. I went back to the cable.
Doug

Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1245880
06/06/12 04:23 PM
06/06/12 04:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

In real quick cars(dont know the ET) its a must to
have a mech linkage with a toe loop



I'm under the impression it is required to have a toe strap (loop) on any mechanical throotle linkage, not required on cable linkage. I don't remember any requiements based on how fast the cars are to have mechanical throttle linkage


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: Cab_Burge] #1245881
06/06/12 04:38 PM
06/06/12 04:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
ramcharger1964 Offline OP
member
ramcharger1964  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
I think I am going to try putting in a fairly heavy spring on the pivot of the crossram linkage (nothing real heavey but just a good backup spring)

I don't want to add any springs or even heavier springs directly to the carb linkage itself - I was told it will prematurely wear the rods of the assembly - This came from Damon Kuhn so I believe it!


Hell B!tch Racing Co.
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: ramcharger1964] #1245882
06/06/12 04:50 PM
06/06/12 04:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
I used the stock return springs (one on each carb)and bracket on my M.W NHRA stocker for many years, no problems with use or tech


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: Cab_Burge] #1245883
06/06/12 05:39 PM
06/06/12 05:39 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

In real quick cars(dont know the ET) its a must to
have a mech linkage with a toe loop



I'm under the impression it is required to have a toe strap (loop) on any mechanical throotle linkage, not required on cable linkage. I don't remember any requiements based on how fast the cars are to have mechanical throttle linkage




I believe any car faster than 6.50(1/4 mile) must
have a mech linkage... but it might be any pro mod
funny car or top fueler.... cable... you cant lift
it with a toe loop

Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1245884
06/06/12 05:49 PM
06/06/12 05:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
ramcharger1964 Offline OP
member
ramcharger1964  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
I actually had a jerk inspector at PIR make me install 2 additional springs - one on each of my carbs.......


Hell B!tch Racing Co.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1