|
Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
#1245875
06/05/12 07:19 PM
06/05/12 07:19 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89 oregon
ramcharger1964
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
|
Had it recommended by more than 1 person that I should ditch the cable throttle system on my max wedge crossrammed 64. They said for safety reasons - If somtheing happens and the throttle sticks, springs break, cable, snaps, etc. - then you can use your toe to manually pull the throttle back up.
Anyone use these or have pic's. Any manufacturers??
Hell B!tch Racing Co.
|
|
|
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
[Re: ramcharger1964]
#1245876
06/05/12 07:42 PM
06/05/12 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481 Chino Valley
RodStRace
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
|
There were many issues with stuck throttles on linkages. The engine mount would break and the engine would torque over, pulling the throttle open more. Race cars are required to have redundant (2) throttle springs. You could even connect one to each carb and a third to the linkage, if you really want backup. I would worry about the guys suggesting this, not changing your setup...
|
|
|
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
[Re: ramcharger1964]
#1245879
06/06/12 06:33 AM
06/06/12 06:33 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,871 MI, usa
dvw
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,871
MI, usa
|
Quote:
Had it recommended by more than 1 person that I should ditch the cable throttle system on my max wedge crossrammed 64. They said for safety reasons - If somtheing happens and the throttle sticks, springs break, cable, snaps, etc. - then you can use your toe to manually pull the throttle back up.
Anyone use these or have pic's. Any manufacturers??
I did it on my 63 Dodge crossram. Pain in the but. Bigger hole in the firewall to make it have the correct geometry with the stock pedal. I went back to the cable. Doug
|
|
|
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1245881
06/06/12 04:38 PM
06/06/12 04:38 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89 oregon
ramcharger1964
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
|
I think I am going to try putting in a fairly heavy spring on the pivot of the crossram linkage (nothing real heavey but just a good backup spring)
I don't want to add any springs or even heavier springs directly to the carb linkage itself - I was told it will prematurely wear the rods of the assembly - This came from Damon Kuhn so I believe it!
Hell B!tch Racing Co.
|
|
|
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1245883
06/06/12 05:39 PM
06/06/12 05:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
In real quick cars(dont know the ET) its a must to have a mech linkage with a toe loop
I'm under the impression it is required to have a toe strap (loop) on any mechanical throotle linkage, not required on cable linkage. I don't remember any requiements based on how fast the cars are to have mechanical throttle linkage
I believe any car faster than 6.50(1/4 mile) must have a mech linkage... but it might be any pro mod funny car or top fueler.... cable... you cant lift it with a toe loop
|
|
|
Re: Cable vs. Mechanical Linkage?
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1245884
06/06/12 05:49 PM
06/06/12 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89 oregon
ramcharger1964
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
|
I actually had a jerk inspector at PIR make me install 2 additional springs - one on each of my carbs.......
Hell B!tch Racing Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|