Quote:

---

Why not try the V6 or even the 4 cyl for something different and economical?

---

Back on track, people.

An A-body should be a lot lighter than a 4x4 Dakota, so the V6 MPG comparisons to the 5.2 aren't the same. A 3.9 should do pretty well in an A, I'd think. Gearing would make-or-break the MPG result.

I wouldn't try the 4cyl in anything other than a super-light 66-older model, though. A 2.2 turbo/5-speed 65 BCuda sounds really neat to me! A 253hp 3.5 out of a 300M would be pretty neat, too.

For V-6, the 3.9 should be easiest to swap, then the 3.7, then the 3.5. 3.7s take the A904 adaptation, I believe, but they are all DBW according to what I've read, so the EFI would be a nightmare (lots of OBD2 engine-vehicle stuff). The 3.5 was used in teh Prowler but that had a rear transaxle. I haven't heard of anyone adapting the 3.5 to a RWD trans (not that I know everything, but I read and netsurf a lot on these types of things).