Quote:
Quote:
His analogy was only a generalization for visualization purposes, wasn't likely meant to prove or disprove anything. 
The only reason for an analogy is to try to prove or disprove something. That is the definition of an analogy. It is a shame that people work really hard to develop new products to improve our classic Mopars, especially a product to protect from damaging them in a race environment and they get scrutinized. Is it like this in the Ford and GM world?
Maybe we should change the rules that "scrutiny" is no longer allowed on Moparts.
And if allowed, I don't agree with your defintion of "analogy" in this threads context. Ask the writer what his intention was.
Pointing out and discussing design compromises on hardware is not a new thing in the automotive world.
Funny thing is while we are so OT, the "bend" fix is kinda easy. 
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
| 
