This is most likely a case of “the whole is more than the sum of the parts”. “High performance” is usually not a piece by piece equation.
When we do testing we don’t make 9 changes and hope for an improvement.
Oh well, onward and upward.
That’s not what I was suggesting at all. It is more than plausible in my opinion however that you could measure each of these modifications in a vacuum by themselves and see no improvement with any single one of them. But when the right ones are hooked together; bam...... a full tenth.
I see your point now, thanks for clarifying. And yes, I agree with you now.
