Quote: The SFI thing is an interesting issue. I'm sure SFI is very proud of what the rating means, so maybe send it to them for a re-evaluation. I know from getting things UL approved that the parts tested are sometimes not what gets made after a while though the rating stays the same. Things made far away can be more vulnerable, and it can happen without the company knowing it.
I think this hits the nail on the head. SFI has a very high standard to uphold and they might want to know that a product they certified failed in this way. If I were Brandon I'd want the old one back at all costs so SFI doesn't get a hold of it.
Having said that you get what you pay for and I think a balancer is not a place to save money.
