|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#846392
11/07/10 03:38 PM
11/07/10 03:38 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
CRE2004
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
|
Quote:
But I really think this local Pontiac GTO is a real sleeper.
It's got a 476ci ProCharged solid cammed motor and it clocks high 9s with ease.
Now that's my idea of a sleeper 
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: CRE2004]
#846393
11/07/10 04:30 PM
11/07/10 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52
canada
W2-408
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52
canada
|
Known as "the cream dream". Twin turbo LS1, drives it to the track, runs 8.60's at 160mph.
Street car, 10.12 @ 132 with W2's and pump gas
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: W2-408]
#846396
11/07/10 04:35 PM
11/07/10 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
all spooled up
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
|
Quote:
Known as "the cream dream". Twin turbo LS1, drives it to the track, runs 8.60's at 160mph.
that gets my vote 
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: joedust451]
#846399
11/07/10 05:14 PM
11/07/10 05:14 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
CRE2004
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
|
Quote:
Notice a "trend" here, I see a bunch of GMs 
Sure I do, but look at both offerings from GM and Ford and then look at what Mopar drips out. The new hemi was kicked out the door and development just stops. Compare that to all the variations and evolutions of the LS engines and the mod motors. Until Chrysler decides to be a player with a real performance division and an actual ongoing R&D department, the trend will always be GM or Ford.
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: krw71ragtop]
#846400
11/07/10 05:15 PM
11/07/10 05:15 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
410" stroker, 850 dp holley, Edelbrock heads, stage 2 ported by Ryanj, airgap intake also port matched, Milodon gear drive timing set, 10.8-1 comp quench motor. Hooker headers, 3500 stahl converter, 727 trans, 4.10 gears. And more.....
Some of these cars listed are Factory muscle cars and are far from being sleepers !
Yeah, well, what's it run?
I know, I know, you never are supposed to know what the best sleepers run! 
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: thehemikid]
#846403
11/07/10 08:04 PM
11/07/10 08:04 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,601
ky
headhunter
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,601
ky
|
Quote:
Quote:
Some of you guys have a strange idea of what a sleeper is. Tubbed, tube-chassis cars by virtue cannot stake claim to "sleeper" status. Blowers and chromed out engine compartments are automatically out. Heck, mag wheels, spoilers, and racing stripes ruin the vibe for me... but hey, thats me.
Mine may not be the fastest car in town, but it plays the sleeper role to a tee in my book, going 12.30's at 110+ with hub caps and a fairly stock to the eye vibe.
...would this be sleepy enough?
rusty is to cool
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: mphsmitch]
#846404
11/07/10 08:12 PM
11/07/10 08:12 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
all spooled up
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
|
Quote:
Quote:
We have a local guy with a mid 80's Chevy Monte Carlo,on 24's it runs mid 10's and on slicks high 8's ,but it makes close to 1000rwhp. This looks like a stock street car with big stereo,full interior,etc.
This car was built at the shop I work at and its pretty nasty. It has a 400 cid procharged SBC that makes about 670 rwhp with a 200 shot for good measure. It has been 135 mph on those big wheels. It has been high 8s at 145 mph
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnoNYzen1KM Its the silver car. WITH NO ROLLER BAR 
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: all spooled up]
#846405
11/08/10 01:48 AM
11/08/10 01:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,467
So Cal
|
Quote:
Quote:
Known as "the cream dream". Twin turbo LS1, drives it to the track, runs 8.60's at 160mph.
that gets my vote
Yep, same here.
Shiney bright colored namebadged musclecars need not apply. 
Quote:
10" stroker, 850 dp holley, Edelbrock heads, stage 2 ported by Ryanj, airgap intake also port matched, Milodon gear drive timing set, 10.8-1 comp quench motor. Hooker headers, 3500 stahl converter, 727 trans, 4.10 gears. And more.....
Some of these cars listed are Factory muscle cars and are far from being sleepers !
I like that. Good use of full front wheel cover and white walls. The rear chrome rim should go though.
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: 1962Savoy]
#846408
11/08/10 02:38 PM
11/08/10 02:38 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,805
ky hills
thehemikid
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,805
ky hills
|
Quote:
tried to make it asleeper but failed!!!
... Love the 62's, especially the sedan's.
|
|
|
Re: Post pictures of BADDEST SLEEPER in your area
[Re: maximum entropy]
#846410
11/08/10 06:28 PM
11/08/10 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
65signet
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 498
El Dorado Ca
|
Driven by a girl, runs high 11s street/strip spends a lot of time at the track, check out the the small bolt steel wheels 
Last edited by 65signet; 11/08/10 09:12 PM.
1965 Plymouth Barracuda 273 M/SA
1970 Plymouth Duster 360/904 10.60s with J heads
|
|
|
|
|
