Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim #831962
10/17/10 04:25 PM
10/17/10 04:25 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
6
67383scuda Offline OP
member
67383scuda  Offline OP
member
6

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
hi moparts!

the car
-- 3100 lb a body with 440
11 to 1
auto
600 + cam lift solid
runs high tens 1/4 now, but planning a aluminum head swap (victors or at least the rpm edelbrocks)

which carburetor system would be the "best" overall. factoring in things like
1. all out performance
2. reliability
3. any constant "tuning" issues other than adjusting for air quality whatever

basically the worked over 830 annular discharge on the rpm intake works great with the "average at best 906 head" , its consistent and never does anything "wrong"--yay!

ive always wanted a 3 x 2's cause its neat and i hear the cfm is like 1100 WOT.
assuming things like manifold flow numbers are similar (six pak vs victor single 4) which induction system would make the better bracket setup on a high 9's low 10's 1/4 miler?

thanks!

Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: 67383scuda] #831963
10/17/10 04:43 PM
10/17/10 04:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
The 830 is small so in that case I would say the 6 pac
but I hate running multiple carbs... I would go with
a 1050 dom... JMO

Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: MR_P_BODY] #831964
10/17/10 04:56 PM
10/17/10 04:56 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
6
67383scuda Offline OP
member
67383scuda  Offline OP
member
6

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
--thanks for the input., . the victor manifold for either of the victor heads are set up for that 1050 i see . if single 1050 is the way to go i prob wouldnt get the max wedge ports == and i cant see much diff on flow numbers between the regular victors and the max wedge victors.
who knows why one head style would be better than the other. i dont know what 10 cc more runner volume has to do with the equation.
a friend had the 830 on a bench and he said it had been "reworked" and flowed more like 900. bought it off ebay.

thanks again

Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: 67383scuda] #831965
10/18/10 01:31 AM
10/18/10 01:31 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Mr P. Body is right about the 830 on your combo.
The six pack flows about 950-970cfm at best (measured as a large cap 4bbl), which is great but
not optimal for you combo. The 1050cfm carb would
put you there. The 830 would
not be bad, but you may not pull the numbers you want with that carb.



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: HYPER8oSoNic] #831966
10/18/10 07:43 AM
10/18/10 07:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,729
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,729
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Quote:

The six pack flows about 950-970cfm at best (measured as a large cap 4bbl), which is great but
not optimal for you combo.




Make up all the numbers that you want. The venturis, throttle bores and boosters of the outer carbs are the same size as an 850 and the center is the same size as the front half of a 590(only with better boosters). Do the math. 850 + 295 = 1145cfm. The old Direct Connection books refered to them as 425 cfm outers and 295 middle carbs. I guess they must have used the same logic.


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: 67383scuda] #831967
10/18/10 09:29 AM
10/18/10 09:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
I think a 950Dp would work fine, but a six-pack is very cool, and when the outboards open, it's nothing like the 2ndaries on a 4bbl.

6256093-4406a.jpg (45 downloads)
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: 67383scuda] #831968
10/18/10 02:49 PM
10/18/10 02:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,218
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,218
Bend,OR USA
I have dyno tested several stock type six pak set ups and a bunch of different single four barrel intakes and carbs, 600 to 1050 CFM Dominator. All of the Mopar V8 I have tested and raced have made more power and torque with more CFM than smaller CFM My low deck street stroker motor had a six pak set up on it until I swapped the heads to a set of Indy 440-1 with a Indy 400-3 intake. That six pak set up works great at the track and on the street As far as the CFM on the stock six pak carbs. the factory rates them at 350 CFM on the 440 center carbs. and 500 CFM on the outboard for a total of 1350 CFM


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: Cab_Burge] #831969
10/18/10 03:16 PM
10/18/10 03:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
S
sshemi Offline
top fuel
sshemi  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
yes but two barrels are flowed at a different depression(sp) so they flow less

Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: sshemi] #831970
10/18/10 03:47 PM
10/18/10 03:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,729
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,729
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Yep, 350 and 500 are the way Holley rated them using the irrelevant 2 barrel formula. As I said earlier D.C. listed them as 295 and 425 which lines up perfect with the venturi and throttle bore diameters of similar 4 barrel carbs.


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: GomangoCuda] #831971
10/18/10 03:56 PM
10/18/10 03:56 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
6
67383scuda Offline OP
member
67383scuda  Offline OP
member
6

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 90
washington
--i appreciate all the input here people! very interesting stuff..

Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: 67383scuda] #831972
10/18/10 04:00 PM
10/18/10 04:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,369
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,369
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Six packs are cool and work great, but I wouldn't want one on something I was going to be racing every weekend. Much easier to work on a single 4.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: an8sec70cuda] #831973
10/18/10 04:06 PM
10/18/10 04:06 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
S
sixpackgut Offline
Drag Week Mod Champion
sixpackgut  Offline
Drag Week Mod Champion
S

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
Quote:

Six packs are cool and work great, but I wouldn't want one on something I was going to be racing every weekend. Much easier to work on a single 4.




i have it down to a science and i have actually caught myself bitchin bout trying to change jets on the secondarys on a 4bbl

an fuel lines on a sixpack makes life much simpler


Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135
Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram

performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: sixpackgut] #831974
10/18/10 04:09 PM
10/18/10 04:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,369
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,369
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Quote:

Quote:

Six packs are cool and work great, but I wouldn't want one on something I was going to be racing every weekend. Much easier to work on a single 4.




i have it down to a science and i have actually caught myself bitchin bout trying to change jets on the secondarys on a 4bbl

an fuel lines on a sixpack makes life much simpler



Ray, you're the exception, lol. No doubt they work good when setup correctly. Your car flies and your advice was priceless when I was dialing in Dad's six pack.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: sixpackgut] #831975
10/18/10 04:19 PM
10/18/10 04:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,864
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Offline
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,864
S.E. Michigan
Quote:



an fuel lines on a sixpack makes life much simpler






I got totally fed up with that metal fuel line the last time I tuned a 6 pack. Taking that stupid line off and putting it back on over and over got old in a hurry.

I'm never touching one again unless it has some kind of flex hose on it....


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: 440 "six pak" vs 440 "830 cfm annular" in bracket trim [Re: Cab_Burge] #831976
10/19/10 09:57 AM
10/19/10 09:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 108
Ohio
7
70BIRD Offline
member
70BIRD  Offline
member
7

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 108
Ohio
For what it's worth the 6 pack carbs on my 493 stroker were prepped by Dale Cubic and when he flowed them he told me they flowed 1037 cfm and 1074 cfm at the 2 different levels he used (whatever that meant - not an expert on this stuff).







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1