|
Re: New Slant Six build
[Re: j.mcconnell]
#696646
06/11/10 07:34 AM
06/11/10 07:34 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 365
Motor City
Shaker223
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 365
Motor City
|
Quote:
is that piece with the BOV's pre-made by someone? why duals? i guess the wastegate is down front somewhere?
Yes, the BOV pice is pre made. Cheap and effective. I used duals because a single could not keep up with the turbo.
The turbo is a Buick style and the wastegate is internal.
|
|
|
Re: New Slant Six build
[Re: ksj]
#696648
06/23/10 11:54 PM
06/23/10 11:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 294
Minnesota
RockChip
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 294
Minnesota
|
That six looks really SWEET !!!!!!! Lookin forward to see what she runs, 
Last edited by not_a_charger; 06/24/10 09:05 AM.
|
|
|
Re: New Slant Six build
[Re: 76dodgeboy]
#696654
06/26/10 01:50 PM
06/26/10 01:50 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
|
I thought us 1st gen (89-93) guys have the H1C mostly. Looks like some of both googling, but I'm not sure of the differences.
5.9L engine with revband to 3000rpm and comfortable up to 25-30psi b4 you push too far out of the sweet spot.
It'll work for you if you'll be putting similar air through it (smaller engine, but up to twice the rpms?) and want to push some higher boost through it. Though stock those trucks only ran 10-15psi.
70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
|
|
|
Re: New Slant Six build
[Re: furious70]
#696656
06/27/10 02:32 AM
06/27/10 02:32 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 350
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Can.
CW25
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 350
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Can.
|
Quote:
I thought us 1st gen (89-93) guys have the H1C mostly. Looks like some of both googling, but I'm not sure of the differences.
5.9L engine with revband to 3000rpm and comfortable up to 25-30psi b4 you push too far out of the sweet spot.
It'll work for you if you'll be putting similar air through it (smaller engine, but up to twice the rpms?) and want to push some higher boost through it. Though stock those trucks only ran 10-15psi.
Missed this earlier but yes you are correct it was the H1C. I think the H1E is larger in all ways but I don't think alot larger. Not exactly sure what they were on... Probably a C series stationary engine? I think it is the same as a HX40.
Back on topic though. What happened to the slant? We need a update.
|
|
|
Re: New Slant Six build
[Re: Shaker223]
#696661
07/02/10 02:58 PM
07/02/10 02:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
BURN DOWN THE SHOP!!!!! OK, maybe we'll let them slide this time since they worked with you. I think you's just skeered to show what your wee little beastie did. 
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
|
|
|
|
|
but would it work better on a 318 than. I thought I read somewhere that it was for a 94. My bad. I dont need a tone of power. It would be more for fuel economy and be driven 50 plus miles a day on the interstate if I can ever find a job 
