Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Are 3.91's enough gear? #384915
07/24/09 10:48 AM
07/24/09 10:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
My GTX performs so-so at best (for a mild 440). It has poor performance off the line and until the RPM get up there. Carb, cam, converter and gears seem to be the problem (see below). This car is 100% street and I don't care about gas mileage.

If I go to 3.91's and maybe a ~3000 converter would that wake up my combo or do I need to get more drastic?

Here are the specs:
'70 GTX
Mild 440
Stock compression forged pistons
Polished and balanced rotating assembly
Mildly ported 906 heads
284/484 MP cam
Eddy RPM Performer intake
Stock manifolds, 2.5" exhaust
FBO electronic ignition
727 w/340 convertor (guessing 2300-ish?)
3.55 Suregrip
275/60-15 rear tires (28" tall)

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384916
07/24/09 11:00 AM
07/24/09 11:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,609
Southern Cal
Noblewk Offline
top fuel
Noblewk  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,609
Southern Cal
I would leave the Gears alone and just change the Converter. You say its 100% Street, and the 3.91's will have you buzzing down the freeway ~3300 rpms.


66 Dart GT, 402 11.18:109 Best 63 1/2 Galaxie 500XL 406 4Speed 13.20:103 Best 2000 Ram 2005 Durango Hemi.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384917
07/24/09 11:02 AM
07/24/09 11:02 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
challenger70 Offline
master
challenger70  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
are you sure you don't have any problems? Even that combo should boil the hides pretty good. I have 3.91's xterme energy cam (.492 lift I think)and a 3,400 stall and it decimates my drag radials and blows ls-2 vettes away. I would think your combo would be better than you describe.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: challenger70] #384918
07/24/09 11:21 AM
07/24/09 11:21 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
First problem is the TQ as that cam needs a 3000 to 3500. 3.55 to 3.91 gear change will give a little but not much.
I'll bet your cam could use degreeing and a little advance from suggested intake centerline install.
If it is the 108 lobe separation and a 106 intake install it would really respond to 103 or 102 intake install.
often when a 484 108 lobe center is lazy the cam is in at a slightly retarded position.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384919
07/24/09 11:35 AM
07/24/09 11:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
My main reason for thinking of this was because of this thread I started on my carb. Most folks said to change the cam (not what I want to do) or add gears and a converter.

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...rue#Post5253122

Last edited by VITC_GTX; 07/24/09 11:36 AM.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384920
07/24/09 11:42 AM
07/24/09 11:42 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,543
chicagoland,usa
B
buildanother Offline
I Live Here
buildanother  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,543
chicagoland,usa
I would get the converter upgraded. (changed)

Last edited by buildanother; 07/24/09 11:42 AM.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384921
07/24/09 11:48 AM
07/24/09 11:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
challenger70 Offline
master
challenger70  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
If your sure your combo is healthy a stall should help alot. My car is 100% street and with a good converter running a 3,000+ stall should not be a problem. I was a little concerned myself about a higher stall on the street but it drives like a creampuff until you stand on it. The 3.91's with a 28 inch tire isn't terrible on the highway if you stick to 60-65, it does get buzzing pretty good over that though. My combo is just a little bigger cam, stall and gear more than yours but it sounds like worlds apart as far as performance, your sure theres nothing else wrong?

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: buildanother] #384922
07/24/09 11:51 AM
07/24/09 11:51 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,414
Stow ,Ohio
D
demon440 Offline
pro stock
demon440  Offline
pro stock
D

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,414
Stow ,Ohio
I think you should finish one car before you
tear apart another.
Don't you have 2 or 3 projects going on right now?
Or you could sell me your Demon.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384923
07/24/09 11:58 AM
07/24/09 11:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
What is your compression ratio? If your tune is good, the right converter and cam will do wonders with 3.54's.

What do you have the timing set at, initial and total? What do your plugs look like? You can easily change the cam and lifters with the motor in the car without removing the intake. You can always contact Dave over at Hughes Engines and talk to him about your set-up and see what he recommends.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: challenger70] #384924
07/24/09 12:05 PM
07/24/09 12:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,884
Michigan
MNobody Offline
master
MNobody  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,884
Michigan
Nobody thinks the stock exhaust manifolds might be an issue? I had a 440 in my 69 charger with 10:1 flat tops, stock heads, Crane .484 cam, Torker 2 manifold, 850 dbl pump, Cyclone headers , 2 1/4" exhaust, accel dual point mech dist and 3:23 gears...that thing would roast the tires if you wanted to and would eat 5.0 mustangs and 350 vettes for breakfast back in the day....

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: MNobody] #384925
07/24/09 01:01 PM
07/24/09 01:01 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
mark7171 Offline
pro stock
mark7171  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
Make torque power. Go 3.55 gear at most with a 4 speed. Let the 3.75" crank pull you, but compensate with a timing curve. Keep a performer dual plane at all cost. Try a 800 AVS thunder, or 650DP both manually actate the secondaries. Also taylor top end with a spacer.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: mark7171] #384926
07/24/09 01:25 PM
07/24/09 01:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline
master
ademon  Offline
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
probably low on CR maybe in the 8.5 zone, that doesn't help with that cam, the exhaust manifolds are not the problem many F.A.S.T. cars running low 11's with them. maybe advance the cam, make sure the FBO stuff is working.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: ademon] #384927
07/24/09 01:37 PM
07/24/09 01:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
mark7171 Offline
pro stock
mark7171  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
why that cam with a stack compression ?

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: ademon] #384928
07/24/09 01:39 PM
07/24/09 01:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Torq converter cam make a world of difference. Not sure who's good now, but I know dynamic used to make a good street/strip converter that'd flash stall to 4-5k yet drive basically normally during regular driving. Something like that would be a night and day difference for your car. If you go to a high stall like that, you can leave your rear gears as-is. If you do the stall, the gears won't make much of a difference.

Quote:

the exhaust manifolds are not the problem many F.A.S.T. cars running low 11's with them.




True, but the fast guys are also going to be running ported manifolds, higher compression and often stroker cranks. But for his application HP manifolds should do the job decently.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384929
07/24/09 01:52 PM
07/24/09 01:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
5
540challenger Offline
master
540challenger  Offline
master
5

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
You could also get a shorter tire 26" a 275/50/15 They are a little wider i think about a 1 inch off the top of my head.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: 540challenger] #384930
07/24/09 02:21 PM
07/24/09 02:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
challenger70 Offline
master
challenger70  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
Quote:

You could also get a shorter tire 26" a 275/50/15 They are a little wider i think about a 1 inch off the top of my head.




it would be a real easy way to see how your car likes a higher gear and free if you could borrow a set.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384931
07/24/09 02:30 PM
07/24/09 02:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
284/484 MP cam <--- that be your problem... and if you have a carterbrock carb. 3.91's and more conver will help. or you can swap the cam out for something a more street friendly. I'd do the cam...much easier and cheaper.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: challenger70] #384932
07/24/09 02:31 PM
07/24/09 02:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

You could also get a shorter tire 26" a 275/50/15 They are a little wider i think about a 1 inch off the top of my head.




it would be a real easy way to see how your car likes a higher gear and free if you could borrow a set.




a 26" tire on a B-body would look silllllllly.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: MNobody] #384933
07/24/09 03:43 PM
07/24/09 03:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,161
CT
Quote:

Nobody thinks the stock exhaust manifolds might be an issue?






Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: GTX MATT] #384934
07/24/09 04:04 PM
07/24/09 04:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
The mani's are NOT the issue. While tha manis are not the best for performance, that cam is what is making the car poo poo. Trust me. Swap the cam out, even with a summit 488 cam and you will be much much happier. You won't need 3.91's (although they'd help) and you won't need to change your convert. That 484 cam sucks compression and won't start workingh until 3200rpm. Which means it's DOG off the line. Plenty of cams will work w/ your set-up get one that will work and you won't need to drop the trans or pumpkin.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: GTX MATT] #384935
07/24/09 04:07 PM
07/24/09 04:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,609
Southern Cal
Noblewk Offline
top fuel
Noblewk  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,609
Southern Cal
Quote:

Quote:

Nobody thinks the stock exhaust manifolds might be an issue?









I'm thinking since he states "It has poor performance off the line and until the RPM get up there." that the exhaust has no effect. Headers or Performance Exhaust has very little effect with low end "Grunt".

The cam has moved the Torque "LOW END Grunt" into a higher RPM Range.

A different Torque Converter that would allow the engine to "Slip into" the higher RPM Range should clear up his issues.


66 Dart GT, 402 11.18:109 Best 63 1/2 Galaxie 500XL 406 4Speed 13.20:103 Best 2000 Ram 2005 Durango Hemi.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Noblewk] #384936
07/24/09 04:48 PM
07/24/09 04:48 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,295
dark side of the moon
D
Dougsmopars Offline
top fuel
Dougsmopars  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,295
dark side of the moon
That cam isn't that radical. I agree with previous that you should check cam timing. A good 2800-3000 stall should be plenty in a 440. Is your intake a dual plane? If not lose it and get a dual plane. Remember basically stock 440's don't make power over 5000-5500. There torque monsters down low. A bone stock 440 with 3;23's should roast the tires off.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Dougsmopars] #384937
07/24/09 05:27 PM
07/24/09 05:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,675
Columbia, CT
M
moper Offline
I Live Here
moper  Offline
I Live Here
M

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,675
Columbia, CT
Your approach is similar to repairing a hole in a dam by adding berms to direct the flooding better... The issue is the cam is wrong. The 484 sounds small, but it has big duration numbers for its size and the rest of the engine can't support it. Therefore it can't support the car. You are looking at hundreds for a gear and convertor swap, or either by itself... Why not spend a few hundred on the right cam? If it's too much for you to handle, find a reputable shop to do it for you. You'll be much happier. It's a dog down low. It's still a dog when you rev because of the manifolds and the lack of compression. So instead of making it a dog you're going to try to minimize the dogginess? So what's the real reason your fear changing the cam? Is it an engine warranty issue or something? The package is perfect for what you do except for the cam. $300 in parts, maybe $400 in labor to pay a shop, and it's fixed permanently. $700 is a little more than buying a used chuck and installing it yourself, and a lot less than buying a convertor with that rear and installing both or having them installed.


Well, art is art, isn't it? Still, on the other hand, water is water! And east is east and west is west and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does. Now, uh... Now you tell me what you know.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Dougsmopars] #384938
07/24/09 05:55 PM
07/24/09 05:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

That cam isn't that radical. I agree with previous that you should check cam timing. A good 2800-3000 stall should be plenty in a 440. Is your intake a dual plane? If not lose it and get a dual plane. Remember basically stock 440's don't make power over 5000-5500. There torque monsters down low. A bone stock 440 with 3;23's should roast the tires off.




The cam is ALL wrong. He'd be better off w/ a stock 440 cam than that 484. It is a bracket racing cam. It needs 10:1+ 3000+ stall 3.91's or better, intake, headers and the rest to work. Trust me a stockish 440 w/ 3.55's and that cam will net you a slow, non tire spinning B-body.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #384939
07/24/09 07:45 PM
07/24/09 07:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,543
chicagoland,usa
B
buildanother Offline
I Live Here
buildanother  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,543
chicagoland,usa
Until you put a 10" converter in it.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384940
07/24/09 07:53 PM
07/24/09 07:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma
I dont know a thing about the 484 cam, but i think 383man ran it in his sons dart with almost stock 383 and ran 12.30s. Big cams in low compression 440s can run well. Throw a 3500 stall in it and it will feel like a different car. Then if you are still unsatisfied with the performance you might consider a cam change.Even if you choose to put a smaller cam in it, the convertor will be a big boost.Should be an easy 13 sec car with street tires,12s with slicks. BUT, before you spend any real money, make sure what you have now is tuned properly.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: demon440] #384941
07/24/09 10:11 PM
07/24/09 10:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
Quote:

I think you should finish one car before you
tear apart another.
Don't you have 2 or 3 projects going on right now?
Or you could sell me your Demon.





Oh, that hurt

Yeah, I have two in bare metal and one in primer...

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: jbc426] #384942
07/24/09 10:15 PM
07/24/09 10:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
Quote:

What is your compression ratio? If your tune is good, the right converter and cam will do wonders with 3.54's.

What do you have the timing set at, initial and total? What do your plugs look like? You can easily change the cam and lifters with the motor in the car without removing the intake. You can always contact Dave over at Hughes Engines and talk to him about your set-up and see what he recommends.




Compression is stock (advertised 10.0:1) with the heads shaved .030". Not sure what actual would be...

I think timing is ~18 initial 35 total (or close to it) on FBO advise.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #384943
07/24/09 10:20 PM
07/24/09 10:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
Quote:

284/484 MP cam <--- that be your problem... and if you have a carterbrock carb. 3.91's and more conver will help. or you can swap the cam out for something a more street friendly. I'd do the cam...much easier and cheaper.




I guess everyone's different but I would rather change a converter and rear end than a cam.

I hate cracking the motor open (nicely painted, etc) and I love the lope of the cam. The sound is the best part of the car.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #384944
07/24/09 10:21 PM
07/24/09 10:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You could also get a shorter tire 26" a 275/50/15 They are a little wider i think about a 1 inch off the top of my head.




it would be a real easy way to see how your car likes a higher gear and free if you could borrow a set.




a 26" tire on a B-body would look silllllllly.




But it would be a good way to see how it would run with lower gears.

Last edited by VITC_GTX; 07/24/09 10:23 PM.
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384945
07/24/09 11:00 PM
07/24/09 11:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
R
RUNCHARGER Offline
I Live Here
RUNCHARGER  Offline
I Live Here
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
I think a convertor would be the best fix. Lower gears aren't necessary and that cam would like more stall. That's assuming the tuneup is right.

Sheldon

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384946
07/24/09 11:14 PM
07/24/09 11:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,020
Pangaea
B5 Bee Offline
master
B5 Bee  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,020
Pangaea
The 484 cam is bigger than most think, you need more compression. If you want more low end power, cut the heads and install the cam at 106*.
Fix the motor first, then tune the converter and gear to it if needed.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384947
07/24/09 11:26 PM
07/24/09 11:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,884
Michigan
MNobody Offline
master
MNobody  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,884
Michigan
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You could also get a shorter tire 26" a 275/50/15 They are a little wider i think about a 1 inch off the top of my head.




it would be a real easy way to see how your car likes a higher gear and free if you could borrow a set.




a 26" tire on a B-body would look silllllllly.




But it would be a good way to see how it would run with lower gears.




I had l-60-14's on my 69 Charger, it didn't look bad

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384948
07/25/09 12:08 AM
07/25/09 12:08 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,881
Pittsburgh,PA
RTSrunner Offline
top fuel
RTSrunner  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,881
Pittsburgh,PA
We rebuilt a '69 GTX 440 to stock specs,except used a 484 Mopar cam.Stock Carter AVS carb,iron intake and exhaust manifolds,906 heads unported-stock valves,only a .030 overbore.2-1/2 exhaust through Dynomax turbo mufflers.Auto 727 with a custom converter,mild stall.Initially it ran the stock 3.23 gear,then 4.10 gear.The GTX ran a 13.9 with the 4.10 gear,in drive shifts at 6200 RPM,never ran it with the 3.23.Tires are BFG 295/50/15's on 10" Weld wheels.The car has A/C and a choppy idle,but ok with the air on.It runs good with the 4.10's,but I always wanted to try it with a 3.55,the 3.23 gave it awesome top end and highway passing power though.I have tuned many stock or near stock 440's and think a 3.55 gear is perfect for an all around driver.The cam as installed may be your low end problem,you could try to advance the cam timing by 4*.BTW the 484 cam in the GTX will shred the tires!(I may have the gears backwards for the dragstip time,it may have been with the 3.23's)I'll check,it is a friends car,and the times were in the early '90's.
RT

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: RTSrunner] #384949
07/25/09 01:00 AM
07/25/09 01:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861
Riverside, Ca
R70RUNNER Offline
master
R70RUNNER  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861
Riverside, Ca
It's the cam, or you need more compression.. which do you want to fix? The 440 can handle the .484 but needs real 10:1 not Morpar magic wanna be factory maybe 9:1 that you have... I'd swap the cam


Current cars: 2000 Dak Quad Cab, 2012 Challenger,1970 Road Runner, 1994 Firehawk


1966 Coronet post sedan, 1988 Corvette, 2005 Magnum RT all SOLD

R70RUNNER<---VP Inland Empire Chapter of the MPM
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384950
07/25/09 01:16 AM
07/25/09 01:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: forphorty] #384951
07/25/09 02:25 AM
07/25/09 02:25 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 577
Grand Rapids, MI
1
11secondC Offline
mopar
11secondC  Offline
mopar
1

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 577
Grand Rapids, MI
1967 VIP 4400 lbs w/driver = 14.17@97, 2.08 60', worn out stock bottem end '62 413, 484 cam, 452's, 750 Carter + RPM, 1.75" headers, 2400 stall, 3.55's, 26" BFG's and it would boil those anywhere in first gear...

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: 11secondC] #384952
07/25/09 08:53 AM
07/25/09 08:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
rather do a convert and rear than a cam??? come on over you can pull my trans and put n a 3k convert for me and I'll do your cam...lol
Really the 484 while some claim in runs well in a low comprssion non-geared car would be suprised how uch better their car would run w/ the right cam in it. Just because you can do a burn out doesn't mean the car is running it's best. If you are careful and clean as you go the engine won't get all nasty. A cam swap is probably your cheapest and best way to go. If you want to keep the 484 you'll need a 3k convert, 3.91's, headers, at least 2.5 exhaust, and probably nothing smaller than a 750DP carb. Also try advancing your timing to 38* @ 2200. Un-hook the vac advance.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: RTSrunner] #384953
07/25/09 08:58 AM
07/25/09 08:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

We rebuilt a '69 GTX 440 to stock specs,except used a 484 Mopar cam.Stock Carter AVS carb,iron intake and exhaust manifolds,906 heads unported-stock valves,only a .030 overbore.2-1/2 exhaust through Dynomax turbo mufflers.Auto 727 with a custom converter,mild stall.Initially it ran the stock 3.23 gear,then 4.10 gear.The GTX ran a 13.9 with the 4.10 gear,in drive shifts at 6200 RPM,never ran it with the 3.23.Tires are BFG 295/50/15's on 10" Weld wheels.The car has A/C and a choppy idle,but ok with the air on.It runs good with the 4.10's,but I always wanted to try it with a 3.55,the 3.23 gave it awesome top end and highway passing power though.I have tuned many stock or near stock 440's and think a 3.55 gear is perfect for an all around driver.The cam as installed may be your low end problem,you could try to advance the cam timing by 4*.BTW the 484 cam in the GTX will shred the tires!(I may have the gears backwards for the dragstip time,it may have been with the 3.23's)I'll check,it is a friends car,and the times were in the early '90's.
RT




I ran the sumit 488 cam in a 67 coronet w/ a basic cast piston (maybe 9:1) 440. stock 906 heads, headers, RPM intake 750DP, 175K convert (2800) car ran consistant 12.90 @ 104. It had the 484 in it when I got it and 3.55's. what a dog. it could barley run 14.0's IMO for a 440 powered B-body that's too slow.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384954
07/25/09 05:24 PM
07/25/09 05:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,457
oklahoma
with 10in 3500 convertor ,12s with 3.55s isnt hard to do . 99.9 percent of performance engines want more convertor than what you have now. Keep in mind that a STOCK 440 magnum has a torque peak that occurs at 3200 rpm. I feel that the biggest thing holding you back enginewise may be the manifolds. A set of small headers(1 3/4 primary) will boost the power from the bottom to the top. I forgot what carb you have, but a 750dp works great on mild 440s.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: forphorty] #384955
07/25/09 06:24 PM
07/25/09 06:24 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
V
VITC_GTX Offline OP
master
VITC_GTX  Offline OP
master
V

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,929
Tri-Cities, Washington
I'm going to keep the manifolds for the stock look. I may just call Kenny at PTC and give him my combo and see what he thinks about a converter swap.

I do have a Holley 750 DP on it.

Re: Are 3.91's enough gear? [Re: VITC_GTX] #384956
07/26/09 09:44 AM
07/26/09 09:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

I'm going to keep the manifolds for the stock look. I may just call Kenny at PTC and give him my combo and see what he thinks about a converter swap.

I do have a Holley 750 DP on it.




Dude do yourself a huge favor from somebody who's been down your road. Change the cam and be done. It will run better, sound better and be much more driveable, not to mention FASTER.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1