|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: RyanJ]
#35446
01/08/10 10:20 AM
01/08/10 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,026
Trumbull,CT.
jim sciortino
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,026
Trumbull,CT.
|
Quote:
I'll be looking forward to see what the car does this year once get some real 1/4 passes on it. Sounds like need to pull some gear out of it. 
Ryan, if the engine is up to it (valvetrain), maybe leave the gear and move the chip.
7800 isn't even 500 over peak and it looks like it holds on pretty good on the sheet.
Crossing 800-1000 over peak might produce the best ET.
What do ya think???
|
|
|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: jim sciortino]
#35447
01/08/10 10:30 AM
01/08/10 10:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
RyanJ
moparts member
|
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'll be looking forward to see what the car does this year once get some real 1/4 passes on it. Sounds like need to pull some gear out of it.
Ryan, if the engine is up to it (valvetrain), maybe leave the gear and move the chip.
7800 isn't even 500 over peak and it looks like it holds on pretty good on the sheet.
Crossing 800-1000 over peak might produce the best ET.
What do ya think???
I just ported the heads & did the machining on the heads.... So I don't have alot of input on it.. ARC built it & it's owned by another guy in LI...
As far as I know it's never been back to track after licensing passes, but I hav'nt asked anyone about it, so that could be wrong. I think it went back to ARC's shop to get ladder barred? or More tire or something done in rear suspension..... I was told the race weight @ one time but I do not remember what it was, I want to say it is fairly light, under 3000 race weight, but again, that is going off of something I was told probably 2 years ago.... my memory is not THAT good. I know ARC is still popping around here a little as he just PM'd me the other day so maybe Alan will see this & chime in.
My opinion on orig question would be..... That thing has steel valves in it, & probably 8000-8100 would be about as high as I'd want to turn it.
|
|
|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: Coldart]
#35452
01/08/10 07:25 PM
01/08/10 07:25 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 243
NJ
arc
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 243
NJ
|
Quote:
what w5 intake used small or large runner?
large runner 4500
|
|
|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: arc]
#35457
05/17/10 07:57 AM
05/17/10 07:57 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
Quote:
just a update if any one cares i got a pass in the car today karl had a bad day he didn't a good pass all day so i got in it late it went 9.37 at 144.77 we got some more work but were getting there
Alan.......that's a good running W-5. What's the race weight?
|
|
|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: arc]
#35459
05/17/10 08:30 AM
05/17/10 08:30 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
S/ST 3040
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
|
Quote:
2750 with me in it 2690 with karl
I know the Moroso Power/Speed calculator don't correlate to most
dynos but, I get 670 HP on that package.........and that's on the
high end of the W-5 scale compared to most.
|
|
|
Re: w5 dyno
[Re: cheapstreetdustr]
#35462
05/17/10 01:27 PM
05/17/10 01:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Ian
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
|
Quote:
that motor is still pulling....too...
those are some serious numbers for a 408"
close to 2hp @ cube...
Hey Ryan..do you remember me saying about 5 yrs ago..that w-5's were where its at?
You certainly seem to have those puppies figured out...
if you could get them re-popped ..? that would be sweet..
then we could ditch the 360-1 /2's
i wish i had more money to spend.
cheaspt.
this 368" W-5 made 511hp 468 fttq should have never let it get away.. 
but the exhaust ports didnt look like yours 
cheapst. 
done right those w-5's are Freeks...
your dreams may come true from what i know. 
|
|
|
|
|
