damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
#2918484
05/04/21 03:20 PM
05/04/21 03:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480 Minnesota
Hemi_Joel
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
|
Does a 2 step launch control hurt the motor? Like matting the gas with no load (stick car) against the rev limiter? If so, what damage does it do?
How about these pneumatic starting line controllers? Anyone use one? Pros and cans of each? I can see that one preserves the accelerator pump shot, one wastes it. What else is there to consider?
[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum RS23J71 RS27J77 RP23J71 RO23J71 WM21J8A I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do. "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Hemi_Joel]
#2918490
05/04/21 03:29 PM
05/04/21 03:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
|
2 steps have been in use for 30 years or more. Even cars with trans brakes use them. No issues.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: JERICOGTX]
#2918495
05/04/21 03:33 PM
05/04/21 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480 Minnesota
Hemi_Joel
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
|
All the ads for the starting line controllers say "Throw away that engine destroying 2-step!"
[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum RS23J71 RS27J77 RP23J71 RO23J71 WM21J8A I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do. "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Hemi_Joel]
#2918500
05/04/21 03:51 PM
05/04/21 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
|
All the ads for the starting line controllers say "Throw away that engine destroying 2-step!" Do you believe all ads?
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: JERICOGTX]
#2918508
05/04/21 04:04 PM
05/04/21 04:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480 Minnesota
Hemi_Joel
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
|
Well, you get about 50 passes per motor. How do you know it's not from the 2 step? My motor had weird damage on the valve tips. How do I know it's not from the 2 step?
Last edited by Hemi_Joel; 05/04/21 04:05 PM.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum RS23J71 RS27J77 RP23J71 RO23J71 WM21J8A I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do. "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Hemi_Joel]
#2918511
05/04/21 04:12 PM
05/04/21 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
All the ads for the starting line controllers say "Throw away that engine destroying 2-step!" I've heard that before too, but never seen any evidence of it.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: R3 Racing]
#2918522
05/04/21 04:27 PM
05/04/21 04:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
I recently changed my car from an MSD 6AL w/ a two step limiter to a digital 6AL-2. The rev limiter on the digital box definitely sounds smoother. Very different sound.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#2918525
05/04/21 04:32 PM
05/04/21 04:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,173 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,173
Park Forest, IL
|
I have heard a 2 step beats the thrust bearing up. I have never seen any evidence of it on any of my junk.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Hemi_Joel]
#2918552
05/04/21 05:12 PM
05/04/21 05:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,129 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,129
Bend,OR USA
|
I wouldn't mat a stick shift car against the two step no matter the RPM on the starting line Push the clutch in all the way and then use the throttle pedal to bring the RPM up against the two step is my choice I use to start dumping the clutch pedal at 5000 RPM and floor the gas pedal at the same time in my old NHRA stocker 1970 Hemi Cuda 4 speed car, shift at 7000 RPM years ago before the better clutches came out like available to day That was way before two steps, circa 1973 IHTHs
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2918673
05/04/21 09:59 PM
05/04/21 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497 PA
moparacer
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497
PA
|
The thing I liked about a SLC when I used one in Super Pro was the ability to mat the throttle at a dead idle and have the car hit the two step at the exact same time before the car launched every pass. Especially important with mechanical fuel injection.
67 Barracuda street/bracket car 11.27-119 68 Dart 502 BB 8.70s-152 414 cid SB Dragster 7.65-174
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Hemi_Joel]
#2918731
05/05/21 06:14 AM
05/05/21 06:14 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
|
Well, you get about 50 passes per motor. How do you know it's not from the 2 step? My motor had weird damage on the valve tips. How do I know it's not from the 2 step? Your issues, have more to do with the number of revolutions on the crankshaft, than it has to do with the 2 step.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2918732
05/05/21 06:19 AM
05/05/21 06:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,021
MN
|
I wouldn't mat a stick shift car against the two step no matter the RPM on the starting line Push the clutch in all the way and then use the throttle pedal to bring the RPM up against the two step is my choice I use to start dumping the clutch pedal at 5000 RPM and floor the gas pedal at the same time in my old NHRA stocker 1970 Hemi Cuda 4 speed car, shift at 7000 RPM years ago before the better clutches came out like available to day That was way before two steps, circa 1973 IHTHs I'd be willing to bet every single Stock, and Super Stock car running a stick in the last 20 years, has parked the throttle right to the floor, on the 2 step, and it's never been a issue. Now, if you are the type to go up on the 2 step the instant you stage, and the person in the other lane hasn't even lit the top bulb, then yeah, I could see an issue.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: JERICOGTX]
#2918764
05/05/21 09:14 AM
05/05/21 09:14 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
I wouldn't mat a stick shift car against the two step no matter the RPM on the starting line Push the clutch in all the way and then use the throttle pedal to bring the RPM up against the two step is my choice I use to start dumping the clutch pedal at 5000 RPM and floor the gas pedal at the same time in my old NHRA stocker 1970 Hemi Cuda 4 speed car, shift at 7000 RPM years ago before the better clutches came out like available to day That was way before two steps, circa 1973 IHTHs I'd be willing to bet every single Stock, and Super Stock car running a stick in the last 20 years, has parked the throttle right to the floor, on the 2 step, and it's never been a issue. Now, if you are the type to go up on the 2 step the instant you stage, and the person in the other lane hasn't even lit the top bulb, then yeah, I could see an issue. ^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^ The older 2 steps from say the mid 1980’s were hard on parts. Also depends on the brand. I’ve used older Mallory analog stuff and it did it sound like the MSD boxes. The biggest issue I found was using mechanical injection and a 2 step. If you are at say...5000 RPM on the 2 step and your foot is on the floor the barrel valve is wide open. You are just hosing fuel into the chambers. I’ve seen bearing damage doing that.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: madscientist]
#2918852
05/05/21 12:20 PM
05/05/21 12:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,106 Byron, NY
W.I.N. Racing
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,106
Byron, NY
|
I have seen no evidence that 2 steps hurt engines although I agree it sounds like it should...The functional difference between the 2 step and pneumatic limiters is mostly carb tuning. With the two step the carb is wide open so there are not any accl. pump concerns (ramp, size squitter vol. ). With pneumatic those are a concern. With a 2 step (or similar) I think you can mitigate your potential damage generation by how you use in I see quite often racers go in and get on the 2 step , some time even before the opponent has staged In my earlier days of racing and racing on a Full tree I preferred to Top bulb leave so I would release the TB on the top Bulb and and floor it on the second bulb. For those of you not using Delay boxes it becomes little tougher but manageable, Most recently I have tried and like leaving off the converter, no two step involved. better reaction time and very consistent.
'01 P1500, Blown/Inj BAE,/Veney ,Bruno/CS2,Dana 60 '01 Dodge 3500 S Cummins Auto, Fresh air kit, 4" Exhaust, '05 Dodge Magnum R/T - Too Much to list '60 Willys CJ5 '01 International LPX - Project,DT466, Allison '64 Plymouth Valiant, Inj 528 Hemi, 2spd
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: theraif]
#2918901
05/05/21 02:47 PM
05/05/21 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,361
Las Vegas
|
Never seen that video my man Jeff actually spoke in camera, Im still in shock
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: damage from 2 step launch rev limiter? V.s pneumatic SLC
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#2918923
05/05/21 03:44 PM
05/05/21 03:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,021 Tulsa OK
Bad340fish
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,021
Tulsa OK
|
The turbo guys dump fuel and retard timing to ignite the fuel in the pipes and help spool the turbo. Seems to work but you better have your exhaust well built lol.
68 Barracuda Formula S 340
|
|
|
|
|