Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: lewtot184] #2884591
02/06/21 02:55 AM
02/06/21 02:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
Originally Posted by lewtot184
i would think the real issue is building for 5300lbs and 3.23 gear. what are the goals? i don't think there is one correct answer for the question of manifolds.


It might be difficult to believe but there's more to life than drag racing. This is a plus-sized cruiser that is the perfect candidate for silly amounts of torque. Think of the Mercedes S65 AMG. A 5.5 liter twin turbo V12 cranking out 635 hp and 720 lb/ft in a 5300 lb sedan. Why? Because they can.

I'm building it because it's my car, my engine, and I want to do it.

The car is so big it's a bit absurd. You just can't take it seriously. However, it cruises down the highway like nothing else. I like having a little fun with my stuff and being just a wee bit different in my builds.


Anyone can build a cookie cutter car by following the same old thing everyone else has done. That's boring.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: feets] #2884611
02/06/21 07:44 AM
02/06/21 07:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
Originally Posted by feets
Originally Posted by lewtot184
i would think the real issue is building for 5300lbs and 3.23 gear. what are the goals? i don't think there is one correct answer for the question of manifolds.


It might be difficult to believe but there's more to life than drag racing. This is a plus-sized cruiser that is the perfect candidate for silly amounts of torque. Think of the Mercedes S65 AMG. A 5.5 liter twin turbo V12 cranking out 635 hp and 720 lb/ft in a 5300 lb sedan. Why? Because they can.

I'm building it because it's my car, my engine, and I want to do it.

The car is so big it's a bit absurd. You just can't take it seriously. However, it cruises down the highway like nothing else. I like having a little fun with my stuff and being just a wee bit different in my builds.


Anyone can build a cookie cutter car by following the same old thing everyone else has done. That's boring.
i'm the kind of person that "if i can't drive it, i don't want it". driving it can mean compromises in performance sometimes and i've always been ok with that. i use a ch28 for my torquey cruiser and really like it.

Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: feets] #2884731
02/06/21 03:18 PM
02/06/21 03:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 670
Los Osos, Ca
C
CKessel Offline
mopar
CKessel  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 670
Los Osos, Ca
Originally Posted by feets
Originally Posted by lewtot184
i would think the real issue is building for 5300lbs and 3.23 gear. what are the goals? i don't think there is one correct answer for the question of manifolds.


It might be difficult to believe but there's more to life than drag racing. This is a plus-sized cruiser that is the perfect candidate for silly amounts of torque. Think of the Mercedes S65 AMG. A 5.5 liter twin turbo V12 cranking out 635 hp and 720 lb/ft in a 5300 lb sedan. Why? Because they can.

I'm building it because it's my car, my engine, and I want to do it.

The car is so big it's a bit absurd. You just can't take it seriously. However, it cruises down the highway like nothing else. I like having a little fun with my stuff and being just a wee bit different in my builds.


Anyone can build a cookie cutter car by following the same old thing everyone else has done. That's boring.

And when you blow by some ricers/late stang-camaro-chally gents, racing on the freeway, with 6 or more friends in the yacht its all the more satisfying.


Carl Kessel
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: CKessel] #2884746
02/06/21 04:22 PM
02/06/21 04:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 911
Washington
H
hemienvy Online content
super stock
hemienvy  Online Content
super stock
H

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 911
Washington
Feets, I'm toasting your attitude and your inevitable success !

Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: hemienvy] #2884962
02/07/21 07:57 AM
02/07/21 07:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,629
pa
572charger Offline
top fuel
572charger  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,629
pa
so i had a indy tunnel ram on my 605 cuin hemi for 3 years i had 2 1050 dominators on it tryed all kind of jetting and timing and air bleeds,,, then i got a raybarton 4500 single dominator intake and a 1250 carb and it picked up 3 tenths and 3.5 mph over the tunnel ram on the 1st pass !!!! [censored] thats my kind of luck though


606 hemi pump gas best 9.60 at 142mph on motor
05 hemi daytona 1500 go-mango 4wd quadcab
2007 hotrod mag pump gas drags runner up, roadkill nights dodge big tire winner 2018 2019 back to back
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: 572charger] #2885078
02/07/21 01:09 PM
02/07/21 01:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,016
rust belt
M
Moparite Offline
super stock
Moparite  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,016
rust belt
How about the mod man intake, You can run a single 4BBL, 6 pack or duel quads depending on what top you use.

[Linked Image]

Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: CKessel] #2885079
02/07/21 01:10 PM
02/07/21 01:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
Originally Posted by CKessel

And when you blow by some ricers/late stang-camaro-chally gents, racing on the freeway, with 6 or more friends in the yacht its all the more satisfying.


And for a short time I'll be in front of them and behind them at the same time. biggrin


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: Moparite] #2885081
02/07/21 01:12 PM
02/07/21 01:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,071
Irving, TX
Originally Posted by Moparite
How about the mod man intake, You can run a single 4BBL, 6 pack or duel quads depending on what top you use.


Modman is quite adaptable but extremely expensive. Those short runners are not likely to be of much benefit to a moderate RPM engine like most people use on the street.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: feets] #2885119
02/07/21 02:19 PM
02/07/21 02:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,498
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,498
Minnesota
Originally Posted by feets
Originally Posted by CKessel

And when you blow by some ricers/late stang-camaro-chally gents, racing on the freeway, with 6 or more friends in the yacht its all the more satisfying.


And for a short time I'll be in front of them and behind them at the same time. biggrin



laugh2 iagree. laugh2.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: Hemi_Joel] #2885262
02/07/21 07:04 PM
02/07/21 07:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
H
Handygun Offline
enthusiast
Handygun  Offline
enthusiast
H

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
Maybe with the new ownership the 2D won't be the exercise in core shift I've heard they are. That would be the intake I'd run, A scaled up stock type one.

Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: feets] #2885332
02/07/21 09:39 PM
02/07/21 09:39 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
Originally Posted by feets
Originally Posted by Moparite
How about the mod man intake, You can run a single 4BBL, 6 pack or duel quads depending on what top you use.


Modman is quite adaptable but extremely expensive. Those short runners are not likely to be of much benefit to a moderate RPM engine like most people use on the street.
and, too much plenum volume. might make a good blower manifold.

Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: Handygun] #2885393
02/08/21 12:19 AM
02/08/21 12:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,150
Melbourne , Australia
LA360 Offline
master
LA360  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,150
Melbourne , Australia


Alan Jones
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: Moparite] #2885465
02/08/21 11:13 AM
02/08/21 11:13 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
The complex interior design and advantages are clearly visible.
Or, it's a shoe box...


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Are new intake designs needed for big engines? [Re: polyspheric] #2912434
04/20/21 05:03 PM
04/20/21 05:03 PM
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 100
Louisiana
BiomedTechGuy Offline
member
BiomedTechGuy  Offline
member

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 100
Louisiana
It looks like a shoebox got dropped in a vat of molten aluminum,
BUT
I'm most likely going to run the ModMan
BECAUSE
By my own mandate, my 541 MUST HAVE A 6BBL.
So, I am fortunate to have bought a beautiful example of the Weiand P3690982 6bbl intake, the "old school" Super Stock intake that far too much research for any sane person has informed me makes the most power when a 6bbl is the choice of carbureation, other than a custom intake.
BUT
I also can't bring myself to run TF 240s on a 541 Bill Mitchell aluminum RB block
So, that means Max Wedge port size and TF 270s. The Weiand can probably have material added to the cylinder head end of the runners and then hogged out to MW ports, but I don't think that the runners have enough meat to open them up to the plenum floor
AND
I am hooked on the look of my N96 Air Grabber hood on my 70 V-code Roadrunner
So, that leaves me needing a 3x2bbl intake that will do some degree of justice for my 541 cu in Bill Mitchell aluminum block based stroker motor in my 5 speed, 4:10 geared mostly street driven Roadrunner.
That leaves me with the ModMan. Indy still will CNC the ports to MW size for $100
If I switch over from my Promax modded Holley carbs to a 3x2 F&B DPI/EFI I'm sure the ModMan would work even better, but I have to start with the Holley carbs.
If by some tragedy the ModMan doesn't fit with the Air Grabber, then I'm left with the factory aluminum dual plane 6bbl intake, or give up my beautiful hood, go to a "tall" 6 pack scoop, and that would make me consider a custom top for a 6bbl 440-25 setup or see what can be done with the Weiand as far as porting.
I have the Innovate Motorsports DLG-1 dual wideband O2 sensor system.

Last edited by BiomedTechGuy; 04/20/21 05:05 PM.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1