|
Re: Fluidampr (viscous damper)
[Re: Moe]
#2815685
08/31/20 09:31 PM
08/31/20 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270 Morrow, OH
markz528
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
|
BS I ran 2 for years with zero issues - one at 800 hp. Bearings were always fine.
67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph 67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph 69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
|
|
|
Re: Fluidampr (viscous damper)
[Re: Moe]
#2815771
09/01/20 08:56 AM
09/01/20 08:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
On another message board a member writes"A lot of engine builders will not run the fluidampr, they say they can crack a crank"
Is this true......or BS?? True, as in every dampner can break a crank under the right conditions. So the real question should be, is the fluidampner you have chosen the right/best solution for your application. It is a "BS" statement you have shared from the other board in that it omits a lot of important details.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|