Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: topside]
#2738038
01/30/20 10:28 AM
01/30/20 10:28 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,939 Calgary, Alberta Canada
a12rag
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,939
Calgary, Alberta Canada
|
You might also want to pull the thermostat & flush the cooling system. Check the thermostat opening temp in a pot of water on the stove with a meat thermometer. Water (I like distilled) cools better than anti-freeze; if you can do 70% water where you live, that helps.
Plus, there are some aero tricks: 1. Cover holes & gaps in the rad support so all the air goes through the radiator. 2. Put an air dam under the rad support to force more air up through the radiator. 3. Vent underhood heat, but it really won't look stock.
$125 for a stock-looking 3-row is a pretty smokin' deal, actually better than I thought. We should be so fortunate in the Mopar world... LOL . . . that was the price DIFFERENCE between the two types of rads . . . think it's $325 for brand new brass/copper versus $450 for the Alum rad. But yes, it is amazing the lower cost of the "Ford" parts . . .
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2738603
02/01/20 03:51 AM
02/01/20 03:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759 Phila
PhillyRag
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759
Phila
|
Copper and brass will, if in good shape, transfer more heat into the air stream than aluminum will. To Ponder: IRT heat dissipation: Why is a flat/semi black finish a (+) for a radiator, while chrome for a transmission pan may be a (-) ?
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: jlatessa]
#2738874
02/01/20 11:38 PM
02/01/20 11:38 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759 Phila
PhillyRag
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759
Phila
|
Maybe just for appearance, as in spraying black behind the grill?? Joe IRT heat dissipation
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: Andrewh]
#2739040
02/02/20 01:35 PM
02/02/20 01:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,993 Omaha Ne
TJP
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,993
Omaha Ne
|
I have to say I don't think it is the rad. If it works at idle, then higher speeds don't generally reduce cooling.
Higher speed warm up is going to be caused by something else. blocking air flow would be the first thing I would look at.
for instance a mechanical fan clutched, might be having issues with the clutch. I had one going bad, that allowed the car to warm up quite a bit on the highway.
Or an electric fan, aftermarket, that doesn't allow enough airflow at speed.
Or not enough water flow. For instance that sucking shut the lower rad hose. Or a pump going bad, not allowing enough flow.
I would ask if it cools off just fine once you come off the highway. If so then I would say you don't actually have a cooling issue with your rad. I'll politely disagree as at highway speeds one is generating more heat. I had a 69 Coronet R/T (members car) with 22 inch Radiator. Measuring the temperature with a laboratory grade thermocouple probe and digital meter. The car had the same symptoms. I could type out a novel on the things tried and hours lost. There most definitely are other things that can lead to the problem but in my experience it is generally an inefficient core or undersized radiator. The final fix was sending the radiator to from Glen ray. He said the issue lies with the quality of the cores today and their efficiency. That was about 5 years ago and last I heard it has never gone above 190 degrees PERIOD. I probably lost over 200 hours on that one. Actually completely rebuilt the motor twice. As I said I could write a novel on the things tried. This was a stock application and maintaining the stock radiator was required. As to which is better IE: brass/copper vs aluminum. I do not think anyone can answer that question with any certainty as there are way to may variables involved. fins per inch, How they're attached, thickness of fins/ tubes, number of tubes, size of tubes, staggered tubes or not, and the list goes on We later had a 65 GTO with the exact same issue. This car came in with a reproduction radiator that was less than a year old and a new motor. Getting a core installed from Glen rays suggested source again cured the problem.
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: goldduster318]
#2739844
02/05/20 03:41 AM
02/05/20 03:41 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759 Phila
PhillyRag
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,759
Phila
|
Black has better emissivity, you have to be careful about the paint and also the thickness since at some point it would become a disadvantage since it would act like insulation. You got that. Most think of black as a Heat Absorbing color, which it is. But wrt cars it's mostly about Dissipating heat.
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#2739865
02/05/20 08:28 AM
02/05/20 08:28 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497 North East USA
BIGGERED
Reasonable Title
|
Reasonable Title
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
|
Any kind of coating restricts heat transfer from a block or heads OR a radiator...
But I don’t think it’s a massive problem As much as you and I want to believe this your statement is incorrect. I need to dig out some white papers related to cooling of hydro-static systems in large earth moving equipment done by a multi billion dollar corporation. The long and the short was painted components (including tubing etc) increase the systems cooling efficiency. Heads and blocks are no where as efficient at eliminating heat when compared to your radiator and oil cooler. Get the heat to your properly sized cooling components so they may eliminate it. I was most surprised by the recommendation to paint hydraulic tubing vs plating. After reading that paper I wouldn't hesitate to paint aluminum heads for a more stock appearance. Feel free to flame away! TY Red
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: BIGGERED]
#2740097
02/05/20 06:36 PM
02/05/20 06:36 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632 Florida STAYcation
IcorkSOAK
Financed his waterbed
|
Financed his waterbed
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632
Florida STAYcation
|
Yo Red .... me thimks your premise is DEAD ! I’d like to see the papers you say exist FIRST THING that comes to mind that blows your belief out of the water is the operational effect of jet hot coating of exhaust system items.
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: moparx]
#2740425
02/06/20 04:18 PM
02/06/20 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,324 Ohio
jlatessa
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,324
Ohio
|
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: jlatessa]
#2740635
02/07/20 10:55 AM
02/07/20 10:55 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,492 north of coder
moparx
"Butt Crack Bob"
|
"Butt Crack Bob"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,492
north of coder
|
so with that in mind, engines make more hp at a "given" temperature, so has anyone dyno'd a bare engine's hp, then painted it and dyno'd it again for comparison ? just for example, a new hellcat has a high temperature thermostat, while most here worry when the temperature on an older muscle engine gets to 190. myself, i don't start to worry until i see 235 or so. [provided of course, the engine is built right with quality components] am i really crazy ? [wait, don't answer that ! ]
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: moparx]
#2740651
02/07/20 12:12 PM
02/07/20 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,516 Here
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,516
Here
|
Well consider 1 Hp is approx 754 watts, A 754 watt heater puts our a bit of heat IMO. Hopping for a power increase of multiple HP would sure be a significant reduction in radiant heat, by a engine color change ,enough i suspect one would notice it by simply opening the hood of a running motor. that has never been an observation I read here. The takeaway, yes the motor emits less heat with a lighter color. Is it measurable, maybe, Is it much, not enough for us to care. Also, I am no making a clear distinction above between headers/color and engine color. They are separate issues. And Jenkins in Pro stock is claimed to paint his motors white, so there.
Last edited by jcc; 02/07/20 12:16 PM.
"When one’s appeal is emotional, it does not matter if there is no substance."
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#2740902
02/08/20 09:04 AM
02/08/20 09:04 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497 North East USA
BIGGERED
Reasonable Title
|
Reasonable Title
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
|
Yo Red .... me thimks your premise is DEAD ! I’d like to see the papers you say exist FIRST THING that comes to mind that blows your belief out of the water is the operational effect of jet hot coating of exhaust system items. Yo Stoney the jet hot makes my case! It may be extremely beneficial to jet hot everything sans heat exchanger but the cost would be ridiculous! TY Red
|
|
|
Re: Radiator - Brass/Copper or Alum
[Re: BIGGERED]
#2740911
02/08/20 10:01 AM
02/08/20 10:01 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497 North East USA
BIGGERED
Reasonable Title
|
Reasonable Title
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,497
North East USA
|
Yo Doc I haven’t found the white paper yet, but the below addresses painting components not quite as scientifically but I can find more.
Note the discussion was comparing hose Vs tubing.
“ Tube is Cool Hydraulic tubing has some compelling advantages of its own. One of these is its superior heat transfer, especially if it’s painted.
One aspect of heat transfer is thermal radiation. The total radiation from an object is the sum of its reflection, emissivity and transmission of heat through the object.
When hydraulic tubing is painted, it reduces its reflectance and increases its emissivity, enabling better heat rejection, as this case study published in Hydraulics and Pneumatics magazine1 illustrates:
New call-to-action
An industrial hydraulic installation was originally designed to operate at 1,200 psi and at a maximum operating temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 degrees Celsius). Zinc dichromate-coated steel tube distributes fluid from the 600-liter reservoir to the various stations around the plant. Over the years, the system had been added to (without any increase in installed cooling capacity)—to the point where it was now overheating in the summer months.
Because the system operated satisfactorily for 10 months out of the year, management did not want to spend the money necessary to upgrade the cooling system. So, one of the maintenance guys on staff who was familiar with the thermal radiation theory described earlier suggested painting the hydraulic system’s tubing.
Before proceeding, the maintenance team did a test. Team members applied electrical tape to two of the hydraulic tubes, and using an infrared camera, they measured the difference in temperature between the taped and untaped areas. They found the taped areas on the tubes were 7 degrees F (4 degrees C) cooler than the untaped areas.
This gave the maintenance team the confidence to proceed with the idea. Because the rest of the hydraulic system was painted flat white, the tubing was painted the same color.
And, the result? A week and 12 cans of spray paint later, the system was running 10 degrees F (5.5 degrees C) cooler. This might not sound like much, but the end result meant that the hydraulic system could now operate through the two hottest months of the year without overheating. It also meant that the need to increase installed cooling capacity was at least deferred, if not eliminated.”
There are many things in life we believe that are untrue! Maybe at your advanced age and rate ov dEcAY, learnin aiNt n0 longer possible?
Some of my initial description of why, may be incorrect!
TY Red
|
|
|
|
|