Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: 451Mopar]
#2569642
10/26/18 08:53 AM
10/26/18 08:53 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
The '128 intake is only for Stage VI heads, as it eliminates the need for intake spacers to use this intake on an RB block.
It doesn't work for any other combination of which I'm aware (and I owned the standard-port version at one time). Also, not a very good intake without significant work having been done.
Last edited by BradH; 10/26/18 08:58 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: 451Mopar]
#2569864
10/26/18 06:16 PM
10/26/18 06:16 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,482 On the run…
BloFish
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,482
On the run…
|
Significant as in port matching, or something more?
It really doesn't matter whether you win or lose… as long as you look good doing it!
‘65 A100 ‘69 ‘Cuda ‘73 Vega GT ‘06 Mega Cab ‘14 Mercedes SLK
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: BloFish]
#2569907
10/26/18 07:40 PM
10/26/18 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Significant as in port matching, or something more? Yeah, I suppose "something more" would start to describe it. + + would be a good start.
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: 451Mopar]
#2569922
10/26/18 08:22 PM
10/26/18 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Its pretty cut and dried.......
If you have MW size stage VI heads on your RB block, the 128 intake fits that combination of parts. And nothing else.
The 337 intake is for MW sized ports with heads that don't have raised ports......like factory MW heads, or Edelbrock RPM heads that have been opened up to MW size. It eliminates the need for a separate valley pan gasket, since it seals off the valley with a plate cast onto the bottom. It can be used on some raised port heads as well(Indy, Victor, TF270, etc), but there will be a gap between the block end rails and the built in valley plate.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: 451Mopar]
#2570871
10/29/18 09:00 AM
10/29/18 09:00 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 941 Texas, USA
ChrgrCuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 941
Texas, USA
|
I just removed an Indy 2D and finally installed my newly ported 337 from Larry Smith on my Indy headed RB and what a difference! Whoa!
68 Cuda Notchback [Email]10.86@120[/Email]
69 Charger R/T 440/505
2009 Challenger SRT8
|
|
|
Re: Mopar Intake difference P4876337 vs. P4876128
[Re: 451Mopar]
#2570955
10/29/18 12:54 PM
10/29/18 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
It’s like a few other tidbits from MP that was actually a good piece, for a reasonable price.
So.......naturally, you can’t get them anymore.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
|
|