Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Opinions on engine combo and power output #2503649
06/02/18 06:06 PM
06/02/18 06:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
P
Pockets Offline OP
member
Pockets  Offline OP
member
P

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
Just finishing putting together a 440RB stroker. Wondering what power numbers it should make, and opinions on the combo. It's going in a Ramcharger for mud racing/off roading/play truck. 44" tires, 5.38 gears.

Also what would be suggested for a converter, 727 trans. Do not want the converter to slip when driving down the highway at 60-70 mph. Have been considering Hughes 24-25HD 11" 2500 stall.


493 cu in.
440 RB block
Milodon pan
JE 232452 inverted dome piston, 4.35" bore
4.15" stroke, 6.76" rod
Fel pro 1009 head gasket .039" compressed
zero deck, .039" squish
9.5:1 compression
Edelbrock 60929 84cc heads out of the box
Howards solid roller 722113-08
277/285, 245/253 @ .050", 108 LSA installed at 104 ICL to cam card specs. .640"/.640" lift with 1.6 rocker, .022/.022" lash
Comp AMC lifters 861-16, 829-L link bars
Harland Sharp S70016KE 1.6 rockers, Hughes hold down kit
Smith Bros 5/16"x .116" wall pushrods, through pushrod oiling .040" oil restricted
Performer RPM intake with 1" open spacer
Mark Whitener 4150 1050 carb with annular boosters
Straight up derby style headers, 2"x28" primaries, 4"x12" collectors. May add additional length to the collectors.

Thanks guys!

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503652
06/02/18 06:22 PM
06/02/18 06:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
That's not to far from my build as mine is a 440/493. You have more cam as I run a solid flat tappet that's 264 & 270 @ .050 with .585 & .592 lift and a 110 LSA and I use Hughes 1.6 rockers and Manton pushrods. I have a bit more comp at 10.6 and I use the basic SEZ head which is about like your heads. I use the Indy dual plane intake and a Holley 850 DP. I never dyno's mine but my 63 has run 10.70's at over 3700 lbs. It seems to come out around 600 hp on some charts at the flywheel. I would guess your build in the 575 to 625 hp range at the flywheel. Good luck , Ron

Last edited by 383man; 06/02/18 06:25 PM.
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503691
06/02/18 09:08 PM
06/02/18 09:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,867
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,867
Pattison Texas
540 HP, I would not use the 1009 gaskets, get some Cometic head gaskets


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: CSK] #2503743
06/03/18 12:23 AM
06/03/18 12:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,243
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,243
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By csk
I would not use the 1009 gaskets,
iagree
Those head gaskets are for the 4.250 bore 426 and 383 wedge motors, not the larger bore 4.340 400 and 4.320 bore 440 motors scope
The regular, cheaper, 8519PT Fel Pro head gaskets will work fine for your application up scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503769
06/03/18 01:52 AM
06/03/18 01:52 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
P
Pockets Offline OP
member
Pockets  Offline OP
member
P

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
A few 493 we have put together have not had issues using the 1009 gaskets. Is there a known issue we haven’t experienced yet?

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503786
06/03/18 03:27 AM
06/03/18 03:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,467
Sydney,Australia
tex013 Offline
top fuel
tex013  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,467
Sydney,Australia
Originally Posted By Pockets
A few 493 we have put together have not had issues using the 1009 gaskets. Is there a known issue we haven’t experienced yet?

I am kind of wondering the deal here ?
The 1009 is listed as 4.410 bore . Unless you have a big champher at top of bore what issue can you have ?
I have used 4.410 bore cometics in my 440 and 505 , 440 was at 0.055 over
I have fitted 1009 with my Trickflows , and trickflow recommend this gasket . Trickflow also say their head will not fit under a 4.320 bore

Tex


New best ET 10.259@129.65 .
New best MPH 130.32
Finally fitted a solid cam,
stepped it up a bit more
3690lbs through the mufflers
New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm
Power by Tex's Automotive
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503789
06/03/18 03:45 AM
06/03/18 03:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,363
Cotati, CA
Dave Hall Offline
top fuel
Dave Hall  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,363
Cotati, CA
Should make all the torque you would want. I had T/A 10" in a '76 Ramcharger and it slipped too much and I replaced it with a B&M 2,000 type unit which was pretty cheap actually. I didn't have near the HP or gear you have. I found the 5,200 pd. weight was a big factor in how the converter acted. With near 600 est. torque I don't think you will need a real loose unit. It will be fast and fun with the correct gear you chose! up

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503823
06/03/18 10:41 AM
06/03/18 10:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
don't use the 1009 on that bore size.

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: tex013] #2503854
06/03/18 12:11 PM
06/03/18 12:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 277
MN
W
Willie68coronet Offline
enthusiast
Willie68coronet  Offline
enthusiast
W

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 277
MN
Originally Posted By tex013
Originally Posted By Pockets
A few 493 we have put together have not had issues using the 1009 gaskets. Is there a known issue we haven’t experienced yet?


The 1009 is listed as 4.410 bore . Unless you have a big champher at top of bore what issue can you have ?

Tex


Yep. I was gonna use a 1009 since it fit my Indy ez heads but laying them on my '77 440 block. it overhung the bore chamfer but didn't on my back up '72 440 block. So it depends


'68 Coronet 500 w/ Indy EZ-1 headed 446, 727 trans, 9" rear
First day at the track with SUV street tires and no traction: 1.688 60', 7.24 @ 101.79 in the 1/8 mile

Great customer service from: DominicThumper Carbs, B3 racing engines, Porter Racing Engines, A-1 torque converter's, Quick Performance, Racer Brown Cams, R&R Performance, Manton pushrods

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2503881
06/03/18 01:03 PM
06/03/18 01:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,210
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,210
Benton, IL.
Before you pull the trigger on the converter, you might want to talk to a converter builder or two and get their input. With the torque you will be making, it could be a challenge to get one tight enough. And make sure that they are clear with you on how their converters will act in your vehicle. Have them review in detail flash, stall, etc. There might be an off-the-shelf converter for you, but it would be a good idea to talk to the converter guys.

Personally, I have used PTC for many years with good results. But my last couple of converters from them missed the mark and they were too busy to spend much time working it out. Called Lenny at Ultimate. He spent the time to get the info and then re-worked the PTC to my satisfaction.


Master, again and still
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: DaveRS23] #2503923
06/03/18 02:46 PM
06/03/18 02:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
P
Pockets Offline OP
member
Pockets  Offline OP
member
P

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 27
AB
Originally Posted By DaveRS23
Before you pull the trigger on the converter, you might want to talk to a converter builder or two and get their input. With the torque you will be making, it could be a challenge to get one tight enough. And make sure that they are clear with you on how their converters will act in your vehicle. Have them review in detail flash, stall, etc. There might be an off-the-shelf converter for you, but it would be a good idea to talk to the converter guys.

Personally, I have used PTC for many years with good results. But my last couple of converters from them missed the mark and they were too busy to spend much time working it out. Called Lenny at Ultimate. He spent the time to get the info and then re-worked the PTC to my satisfaction.


Hughes recommended their 24-30HD 3000 stall. But the tech reply did not really make sense to me. Seemed opposite to how I was thinking how the choice was to be made. What do you think of what he said? I did give all the vehicle specs, and said we want to be sure the converter won’t be slipping driving at 60-70 mph, because we have ran into that issue before.

“Thank you for the tech card and no I can get you into a 2500 stall with this combo. The tightest you can go is a 3000 stall model. Even if a 2500 stall might allow the engine to remain running with out stalling, once you drop it into low range on the transfer case it would be way to tight for playing in the mud. For mud racing racing you need the complete opposite to keep engine RPM up. 24-30HD is a 3000 stall”

“Thank you, and there is always a chance of additional heat, just run a good cooler in the bed with a fan and that should handle the issue if it is a problem. I have people running much higher stalls on the street that can maintain 180-190 with no issues. Correct stalls actual can produce less heat if its not fighting the engine being too tight.”

Last edited by Pockets; 06/03/18 02:48 PM.
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2504123
06/03/18 11:26 PM
06/03/18 11:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,210
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,210
Benton, IL.
For our vehicles, converter selection is as important (and sometimes) as difficult as cam selection. Which is compounded by a lack of particular cores. I have been through this a couple of times now.

If you want a loose converter...no problem. But if you want a fairly tight streetable converter for our BB stroker motors......that is a real challenge.

I would like to have a tighter converter in my Cuda, but the cores just aren't available to get there.

You know your combo. Now think about what you want the converter to do and call some converter builders with your specs and preferences. The reputable converter guys will tell you what is and what isn't possible.


Master, again and still
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2504132
06/03/18 11:45 PM
06/03/18 11:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Your going to want some stall with your mud bogging intentions. A quality vert will stall where you need and provide very little slippage at highway speeds. My vote a 9.5" 3800 stall Dynamic, or something similer from ati or so. I would not go Less then that with your overall intended combo. If you do, you would be leaving performance on the table.

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Sport440] #2504156
06/04/18 12:42 AM
06/04/18 12:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Originally Posted By Sport440
Your going to want some stall with your mud bogging intentions. A quality vert will stall where you need and provide very little slippage at highway speeds. My vote a 9.5" 3800 stall Dynamic, or something similer from ati or so. I would not go Less then that with your overall intended combo. If you do, you would be leaving performance on the table.



I agree as I run a Dynamic 9.5 in my 63 and in my sons Dart. And we both love them as its their street/strip converters that drive great and work nice at the track. Mine is rated at a 4200 flash but I can cruise at 2500 to 3200 rpm all day long with no slippage or heat buildup. I love it as its been in my 63 since 2006 and still going strong and my 63 is a 99% street car. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 06/04/18 12:43 AM.
Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: 383man] #2504254
06/04/18 10:09 AM
06/04/18 10:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,042
Mt Morris Michigan
mopar dave Offline
master
mopar dave  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,042
Mt Morris Michigan
I agree with the Dynamic vert. I have a 10" 5200 in mt street/strip Barracuda. Cruises so nice with little slippage that 170-180* is the fluid temp on a 90*+ day cruising. Caculated the slippage once and looks like 6% is all it has going down track. Just had it freshened by Lenny. Great converter.

Re: Opinions on engine combo and power output [Re: Pockets] #2504836
06/05/18 02:43 PM
06/05/18 02:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,164
CT
GTX MATT Offline
master
GTX MATT  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,164
CT
563 HP 607 ft lbs

Last edited by GTX MATT; 06/05/18 02:45 PM.

Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1