Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
.040 intake p/v too tight? #1500639
09/12/13 09:59 PM
09/12/13 09:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
#1 Piston, all valve train mocked up, lash 0.0 , dial indicator mounted on intake rocker, roll over to TDC on the intake stroke, push down on rocker .078 movement, 5 degrees after TDC .041 clearance, 10 degrees after TDC .039 clearance,

Exhaust valve P/V clearance minimum at 10 BTDC IS .108

I don't remember if I put this 278@.050 roller cam in straight up or advanced but it looks like retarding it would not be a option with the .108 clearance.

440ci .060 over steel rod .040 HEAD gasket

looking for fixes LOL (piston valve notches). or run it BB- BOOOOMM??
anyone run .040 P/V intake clearance?

I think the exhaust will suffice
Thanks

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500640
09/12/13 10:27 PM
09/12/13 10:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
I think moparts will say .040 is to tight of a clearance , the .040 headgasket is my my quench so the easiest resolution for me prolly is gonna be a less duration cam
Other ideas appreciated

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500641
09/12/13 11:47 PM
09/12/13 11:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
If you have not set(degreed) the lobe centers yet check it and see where the intake lobes are now and go from there BTW, is this with a set of checking springs or the ones you will run? If checking springs and with a solid lifter cam set the lash and recheck it again


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500642
09/12/13 11:52 PM
09/12/13 11:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,313
Charlotte, NC
L
LSP Offline
pro stock
LSP  Offline
pro stock
L

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,313
Charlotte, NC
You'll have a good bit more P to V than that (likely .020"-.030") with actual springs on it.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: Cab_Burge] #1500643
09/13/13 01:21 AM
09/13/13 01:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
I hope you are right about the checking spring because yes they were checking spring and I considered that the spring didn't pull up hard on the valve as I manipulated the valve with my hand as hard as I could pull up on the retainer and zeroing the dial indicator,

290 LBS SPRING on the seat I will have to get out something stronger to manipulate the valve eh. any ideas as to what tool will manipulate? on the car valve spring remover?

it will be fun trying to PV clearancing the rest of the cylinders also if I come up with good clearance on cylinder#1

I will check it out and report back

thanks

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: LSP] #1500644
09/13/13 01:23 AM
09/13/13 01:23 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
I Hope you are right about them checking springs if I had .070 clearance I would be feeling it would be worth while to go on further and do the rest of the cylinders

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500645
09/13/13 01:29 AM
09/13/13 01:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 990
Vacherie, Louisiana
S
SuperStocker Offline
super gas
SuperStocker  Offline
super gas
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 990
Vacherie, Louisiana
I agree. Install the real springs, set the lash and recheck.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: SuperStocker] #1500646
09/13/13 01:36 AM
09/13/13 01:36 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
Considering lash I had the lash set at zero? Doesn't the lash zero out hot ? if not then this would have been an error my part?

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500647
09/13/13 08:15 AM
09/13/13 08:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640
in a cattle trailer down by th...
I think with the lash set you'll be ok, you could retard the cam 2* and see what you get. I have run as little as .080 on the exhaust and .068 on the intake without a problem in my small block.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: LSP] #1500648
09/13/13 08:24 AM
09/13/13 08:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,784
PA
W5DART66 Offline
top fuel
W5DART66  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,784
PA
Quote:

You'll have a good bit more P to V than that (likely .020"-.030") with actual springs on it.




^^^^^^^ this

Check with real springs.

What heads, rocker set up?

If its mopar single shaft deal it will be like .050" more plus your lash.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: W5DART66] #1500649
09/13/13 08:35 AM
09/13/13 08:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,000
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
I Live Here
gregsdart  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,000
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
You should see another .010 from adding the springs you will run and adding the lash in should get you to about .07+? I have run .050, but the pistons didn't let carbon build up where the valves brushed them, and that was a 6200 rpm stroker. So, I would look for at least .075 to err on the safe side. The really tough one is the exhaust. Don't go below the suggested minimum there, as the valve is closing when the piston is close and if there is any valve train issues you will have contact a lot earlier.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: W5DART66] #1500650
09/13/13 10:39 AM
09/13/13 10:39 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
the heads are indy sr 2.14/1.81 with the Harland sharps 1.6in/1.5 es . My other shot at it is to lose the 1.6 on the intake to see if that will help

I will go out in the shop later today and try again if time allows

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500651
09/13/13 11:03 AM
09/13/13 11:03 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

the heads are indy sr 2.14/1.81 with the Harland sharps 1.6in/1.5 es . My other shot at it is to lose the 1.6 on the intake to see if that will help

I will go out in the shop later today and try again if time allows


Yes, going to 1.5's will help. FYI, Hughes rents a tool that will cut the valve notches deeper with the short block assembled if you need to go that route. I did it on a sm blk and it worked good. You could also run a little looser lash than what's called for.


Fastest 300
Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: Crizila] #1500652
09/13/13 11:42 AM
09/13/13 11:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
R
RT540 Offline
top fuel
RT540  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
Starting with checking springs and a dial ind. is a good start, but then I like to use clay on all 8 pistons with the correct springs.

This summer, I had 040 on intake with a thinner gasket of 051 because I didnīt want to test with the new cometics that are 060.
This was with lash and checking springs.

Do a check with clay and correct springs.
Exhaust needs more, when the piston is chasing the closing exhaust valve, and not the other way around( intake chasing piston down).
Any flex in cam, cam drive and valve train will benefit the intake clearance.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: RT540] #1500653
09/13/13 12:56 PM
09/13/13 12:56 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
D
dodgeram1998 Offline OP
enthusiast
dodgeram1998  Offline OP
enthusiast
D

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 312
illinois
thanks for all the support

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500654
09/13/13 01:22 PM
09/13/13 01:22 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,987
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,987
Apollo, PA.
0 lash is the main problem. with 0 lash the ramp starts up way sooner.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: B1MAXX] #1500655
09/13/13 05:53 PM
09/13/13 05:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,397
Carson City, Nevada
Biginchmopar Offline
pro stock
Biginchmopar  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,397
Carson City, Nevada
Like the rest, the first thing you should do is degree the cam then check P to V.

If it is close with '0' lash, under .080" with the gasket, the pistons need a deeper notch.

Do it right the first time or you will have to do it right later anyways with more expence of broken parts.


Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dodgeram1998] #1500656
09/14/13 05:03 AM
09/14/13 05:03 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
If it's still on the engine stand, I would just pull it apart and machine the pistons for more clearance now than be a factor in the future.
When I built my 500" stroker I went with a smaller cam because if P-V clearance issues, when I should have just milled the pistons then. Now that the engine is apart again, I'm going to do what I should have done two years ago.

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: 451Mopar] #1500657
09/14/13 06:17 PM
09/14/13 06:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,836
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,836
MI, usa
I wouldn't be afraid of .040" with checking spring and zero lash. You are going to gain from deflection,spring pressure and lash. If you're worried install one of your springs and lash it. That removes all guessing.
Doug

Re: .040 intake p/v too tight? [Re: dvw] #1500658
09/14/13 10:48 PM
09/14/13 10:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
Quote:

I wouldn't be afraid of .040" with checking spring and zero lash. You are going to gain from deflection,spring pressure and lash. If you're worried install one of your springs and lash it. That removes all guessing.
Doug





Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1