727 glide weight difference - Moparts Forums

Register Log In Moparts Forums Unlawfl's Race & Engine Tech 727 glide weight difference

Print Thread

727 glide weight difference #1452111 06/13/13 04:11 AM 06/13/13 04:11 AM
Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia B big_wedge OP member
big_wedge OP member B Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia	whats the weight difference between a glige and a 727? without converter

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: big_wedge] #1452112 06/13/13 07:13 AM 06/13/13 07:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN B BB65Barracuda super stock
BB65Barracuda super stock B Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN	http://lmgtfy.com/?q=+whats+the+weight+difference+between+a+glige+and+a+727%3F+without+converter+ 1957 Power wagon wm300 original 10.000 mile truck, 1964 dodge Polara Convertible numbers matching

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: BB65Barracuda] #1452113 06/13/13 08:26 AM 06/13/13 08:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia B big_wedge OP member
big_wedge OP member B Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia	wow, that sure didnt help. why didnt you just say you dont know instead of wasting our time

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: big_wedge] #1452114 06/13/13 08:45 AM 06/13/13 08:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 41 PA R R5P7 Bantam member
R5P7 Bantam member R Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 41 PA	My ultra glide with ultra bell and roller tailshaft housing weighs 106 lbs dry. I'm sure someone here has a TF weight to compare, just remember to add the weights of the shields as well. Mike

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: R5P7 Bantam] #1452115 06/13/13 09:20 AM 06/13/13 09:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,746 Ontario, Canada Dodgem master
Dodgem master Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,746 Ontario, Canada	I think a dry 727 is 135 ish I can't lift them any more!

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: big_wedge] #1452116 06/13/13 02:20 PM 06/13/13 02:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN B BB65Barracuda super stock
BB65Barracuda super stock B Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN	Quote: wow, that sure didnt help. why didnt you just say you dont know instead of wasting our time Sorry, I couldn't resist! If you were considering the glide it is a great choice if you have a light car. I ran a 1.76 glide with the turbo input shaft and a Coan 5k 8" convertor in the 65 for 4 years. Performed flawlessly. 1957 Power wagon wm300 original 10.000 mile truck, 1964 dodge Polara Convertible numbers matching

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: BB65Barracuda] #1452117 06/13/13 04:34 PM 06/13/13 04:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia B big_wedge OP member
big_wedge OP member B Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 50 Australia	Hey thanks for that input, Id done a google before posting my question but came up blank, what would be considerd "light"?

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: big_wedge] #1452118 06/15/13 12:43 AM 06/15/13 12:43 AM
Joined: Feb 2003 Posts: 3,456 Out West 4 408strokerdart master
408strokerdart master 4 Joined: Feb 2003 Posts: 3,456 Out West	I see many people say that 2800 lbs is the break even weight between a 727 and glide. Mine was 2900 lbs when I changed over to a glide and I actually picked up et. All cars are a little different though. It has been deadly consistent. I don't know what the difference is in weight between the two, but it's not much difference. Last edited by 408strokerdart; 06/15/13 12:48 AM.

Re: 727 glide weight difference [Re: 408strokerdart] #1452119 06/15/13 06:50 AM 06/15/13 06:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN B BB65Barracuda super stock
BB65Barracuda super stock B Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 926 MICHIGAN	My a body with me in it was around 3000lbs. 1957 Power wagon wm300 original 10.000 mile truck, 1964 dodge Polara Convertible numbers matching

Moderated by Al_Alguire, Hotwheelsjr, moparts, not_a_charger, RangerDan440, tboomer

Hop To

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1