Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: JohnRR]
#1109599
11/09/11 07:41 PM
11/09/11 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,731 North Dakota
6PakBee
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,731
North Dakota
|
I'm guessing that is a mis-strike on the ID number. MV or MN was the Marysville engine plant.
"We live in a time when intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won't be offended".
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: 6PakBee]
#1109600
11/09/11 08:20 PM
11/09/11 08:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I'm guessing that is a mis-strike on the ID number. MV or MN was the Marysville engine plant.
Was that the plant Hemis were built at ?
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: 6PakBee]
#1109603
11/10/11 09:43 AM
11/10/11 09:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624 Fort Worth, Texas
xs29j8
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm guessing that is a mis-strike on the ID number. MV or MN was the Marysville engine plant.
Was that the plant Hemis were built at ?
I've seen more than one of the '68 and later Hemi blocks with the 'MN' prefix on the ID # so I would say that Hemis were built there. Was that the only plant? I thought that Mound Road built them too but I can't find any examples of this.
Hemis were only built at Marysville (MN or MV), not at Mound Road (PM,GM,HM)...
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: Bishop]
#1109605
11/11/11 01:08 PM
11/11/11 01:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,731 North Dakota
6PakBee
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,731
North Dakota
|
No. With the assembly stamping on the bottom of the motor, this started life as an engine, not a bare block.
"We live in a time when intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won't be offended".
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: Bishop]
#1109606
11/11/11 01:43 PM
11/11/11 01:43 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624 Fort Worth, Texas
xs29j8
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
I just got back the Hemi block from the shop today from getting a good cleaning and I don't see any numbers stamped on the top of the back of the block for the VIN, could this be a over the counter block?
Thanks Brian
This older thread may shed some light on a possible reason:
Earlier thread on this subject...
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: Bishop]
#1109608
11/14/11 06:09 PM
11/14/11 06:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Maybe the engine block was never stamped? Should the enginge ID pad have something else stamped on it?
Thanks
If the only thing on the ID pad up top is WT and A then it's more than likely an over the counter short block assembly and wasn't a production line install.
Is there a small , 1/8" maybe , blind hole near a freeze plug ?
|
|
|
Re: 426 HEMI block # stampings help
[Re: JohnRR]
#1109612
11/15/11 04:11 AM
11/15/11 04:11 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624 Fort Worth, Texas
xs29j8
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe the engine block was never stamped? Should the enginge ID pad have something else stamped on it?
Thanks
If the only thing on the ID pad up top is WT and A then it's more than likely an over the counter short block assembly and wasn't a production line install.
Is there a small , 1/8" maybe , blind hole near a freeze plug ?
Well, my numbers matching block for my '68 Charger only has WT & A (actually T W & A)...
I bought the car in about 1977...
|
|
|
|
|