Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
[Re: aarlucas]
#700485
12/22/11 12:48 PM
12/22/11 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,564 St. Clair Shores, Michigan
bigsbigelow
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,564
St. Clair Shores, Michigan
|
Quote:
Nellie is actually happy that it is being restored. She would be happy if it were raced too. But, it is not every day you come across a car that is this complete and original. With the except of the body and the headers, everything is original as last ran. So updating it would almost be building a new car completely. I really don't need to race it to feel good about it either to be honest. More people in the racing world really want to see it left original than updated and raced too.
Well, I would have lost that bet. Good luck with project.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
05/17/10 05:53 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
RonTheAnnouncer
|
05/17/10 07:44 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
Kevins493
|
05/17/10 07:44 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
aarlucas
|
05/17/10 08:12 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
blown572dart
|
05/18/10 12:22 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
blownzoom440
|
05/18/10 12:40 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, "Not dial up friendly"
|
Chassisman
|
05/18/10 01:32 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
05/19/10 12:12 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Darrell
|
05/22/10 12:48 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Dads426
|
05/22/10 01:29 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
05/24/10 05:38 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Dads426
|
05/24/10 07:05 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
In_The_Pink
|
12/21/11 07:39 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/21/11 03:30 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/21/11 03:34 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
383man
|
12/21/11 06:43 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
05/24/10 05:39 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
tboomer
|
05/24/10 06:06 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Chris_R/T
|
05/22/10 05:16 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
05/24/10 05:31 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
jamesc
|
05/22/10 06:31 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
bigsbigelow
|
12/21/11 07:44 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/22/11 12:19 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
sixpackgut
|
12/22/11 12:31 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Sledge_57
|
12/22/11 12:52 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
bigsbigelow
|
12/22/11 04:48 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
B1duster
|
12/22/11 03:02 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
RodStRace
|
12/22/11 06:04 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
23T Hemmee
|
12/25/11 07:37 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
Guitar Jones
|
12/25/11 11:58 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/25/11 12:39 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
23T Hemmee
|
12/26/11 05:38 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
23T Hemmee
|
12/26/11 05:40 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
cheapstreetdustr
|
12/25/11 10:51 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/26/11 02:11 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
cheapstreetdustr
|
12/26/11 03:36 AM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
aarlucas
|
12/26/11 04:02 PM
|
Re: Not Mopar, but the engine is, 1971 AA/FC pics
|
In_The_Pink
|
12/29/11 04:05 AM
|
|
|
|