Quote: “Anecdotal evidence based solely on the experiences of individual consumers is insufficient to support product efficacy claims, including claims related to horsepower, torque, fuel economy or engine heat,” the organization stated. “While the advertiser may quote from published articles if it provides clear and conspicuous attribution to the publisher, it may not rely on such articles to support efficacy claims for which it has no reliable independent validation.”
Yea, after all the finger pointing was over in that "article" (sure seems like a "competitor" paid for that one?) that one paragraph pretty much summed it up for me as well, there is no clear winner, only "opinions".
So there you have it folks, it's "A Pig-In-A-Poke"
