Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?

Print Thread

Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"? [Re: BradH] #2709633 10/23/19 07:41 PM 10/23/19 07:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2012 Posts: 429 Washington skrews mopar
skrews mopar Joined: Jul 2012 Posts: 429 Washington	Went from 8.75 with 30 spline axles, spool, 4.56 gears, 10" brakes with cooling ribbed drums to S60 with 35 spline axles, spool, 4.56 gears, 10" brakes with smooth drums. Weight difference was just shy of 30#. No perceived difference in ET or MPH.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/21/19 03:52 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	madscientist	10/21/19 04:24 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	Locomotion	10/21/19 04:24 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/21/19 04:32 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	CSK	10/21/19 04:41 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	topside	10/21/19 04:58 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	Cab_Burge	10/21/19 05:08 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	GY3	10/21/19 08:02 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	70AARcuda	10/21/19 08:06 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	polyspheric	10/21/19 11:45 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	plycuda	10/21/19 11:59 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	J_BODY	10/22/19 12:14 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/22/19 12:34 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	GY3	10/22/19 01:04 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	B3422W5	10/22/19 01:14 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	CMcAllister	10/22/19 01:22 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	Bad340fish	10/22/19 04:07 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	70AARcuda	10/22/19 04:25 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/22/19 10:31 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	Den300	10/22/19 10:37 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	pittsburghracer	10/22/19 12:15 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	J_BODY	10/22/19 12:49 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	an8sec70cuda	10/22/19 02:53 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	340Cuda	10/22/19 05:50 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	Ray408G3Hemi	10/22/19 07:28 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	DoctorDiff	10/23/19 03:47 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/23/19 10:32 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	skrews	10/23/19 11:41 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	AndyF	10/24/19 03:28 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/24/19 10:34 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	CSK	10/24/19 01:03 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	second 70	10/24/19 03:55 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	SportF	10/24/19 06:28 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/24/19 06:48 PM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	SportF	10/25/19 12:53 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	justinp61	10/25/19 01:17 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	skrews	10/25/19 01:26 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	madscientist	10/25/19 02:07 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	AndyF	10/25/19 01:28 AM
Re: Strange S-60 more efficient than 8.75"?	BradH	10/25/19 03:09 PM

Moderated by Al_Alguire, Hotwheelsjr, moparts, not_a_charger, RangerDan440, tboomer

Hop To