Originally Posted By SportF
Originally Posted By CMcAllister
The 12 bolt design is a bit more efficient than the 9". Guys who use that are typically lightweight, not tons of power and willing to do whatever it takes for the last bit of performance. Think Comp.


Anybody ever seen a definitive/scientific test of rear end drag? Never heard of one. There was a magazine that did some tests, but as unscientific as it comes.

In fact, that took so much effort I am astounded that they did it when it all could have been done on a bench.

As such, this power robbing 9 inch story carries on and on, and will never end.


I find it amusing.




There have been tests. The HP loss (or gain) is found in the gear ratio.

The lower the gear, the better the Dana is. Once you get lower than 4.88 the Dana gets better. IIRC, way back in the day the break even point was 4.10ish with anything taller than 4.10 and the 9 inch was better.


As for weigh, I've seen it published, but who did the test I don't recall. There wasn't 10 pounds difference between any of the rear axles when you build them to be raced with.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston