|
|
Re: Cam duration vs cubic inches
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1082433
09/26/11 12:58 AM
09/26/11 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
emarine01
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
|
Quote:
Quote:
Wow, that's 300 more rpm drop than my best guess  So If we apply the 1* per 10 cube rule 360 to 408 lets say 5* more duration, about how much will rpm rise?
 I'm a racer and engine assembler, not a engine sceinintest(SP  ) or theoryist   I can call Comp Cams race dept. tomorrow and get their engineers involved, if you want, That is who I use on new engine combinations for racing, PM me with more info on your total combination 
Thanks for the offer but I am just trying to apply some hard learned info for some easy answers.... or if there are any rule of thumb type answers that are even close to real world results...Sometimes these threads produce some real good info with the math to back it up sometimes not,But its all part of the learning curve, Thats what makes Moparts so cool... the diversity and knowledge of its members  Also I did mention I was bored 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
