Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? #968695
04/07/11 06:45 PM
04/07/11 06:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
what you read.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: NachoRT74] #968696
04/07/11 11:33 PM
04/07/11 11:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
No actual exp. Just from the math it'd move the in/ex valve inside edges .125" closer (starting w 2.08/1.74). If that would work w no interference you could plunge cut the walls to unshroud the rest


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: NachoRT74] #968697
04/07/11 11:47 PM
04/07/11 11:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
You don't want 1.88 exhaust valves anyways 1.81 is about as big as you would want to go.

2.19/1.88 may actually hit.

Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: Dodgem] #968698
04/08/11 12:00 AM
04/08/11 12:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
2.14/1.81 is the std oversize combo. Just wondering would 2.19/1.81 or 2.14/1.88 be better or worse


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: RapidRobert] #968699
04/08/11 12:31 AM
04/08/11 12:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
yes thats why I'm asking... I allways have known about 2.14/1.81 oversizes, but really suprised me when I saw the 2.19/1.88 option too even from MP

actually MP offers 2.20 not 2.19

I have though about a 2.14/1.88 combination too.

Not now, but in a future ( unless I screwed up porting my heads now LOL )


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: NachoRT74] #968700
04/08/11 12:56 AM
04/08/11 12:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 83
Long Island, NY.
S
Stroked65Belv Offline
member
Stroked65Belv  Offline
member
S

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 83
Long Island, NY.
I have the exact set up on my 452 cast heads. Were done by Indy years ago. Still in use and flow well on my 498 stroker. Was an expensive set up years ago but you can do better now out of the box with stock alum heads at more reasonable $$$ these days..

Re: Is it safe 2.19/1.88 on 452 iron heads ? [Re: Dodgem] #968701
04/08/11 01:04 AM
04/08/11 01:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
Quote:

You don't want 1.88 exhaust valves anyways




why?


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1