Re: Cam upgrade recommendations.......Nobody else??
[Re: R/T1968R/T]
#956798
03/24/11 03:55 AM
03/24/11 03:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
|
Quote:
No one else has an idea?
I've use the XE285HL and the XE295Hl in two different motors in my Duster, it ran 11:30s spinning the tires through the muffs and pump gas motor only with the 446 C.I. motor with the XE285HL cam.That motor is 9.46 to 1 comp ratio using the Speed Pro forged six pak pistons and a set of ported 906 heads with 2.14 and 1.81 valves, Eddy RPM intake and a Holley 950 HP The other motor is a 464 C.I., 4.35 bore with a offset ground 440 crank with 3.91 stroke, Diamond custom pistons, 10.46 to 1 comp. ratio, Eddy RPM heads unported and a stock Eddy six pak intake and stock vacume carbs work on, that combination runs high tens with the muffs and air cleaner on motor only on pump gas.BTW, I hate Mopar cams, all of them I have built and raced Mopars for a lot of years, my low deck stroker 518 C.I. pump gas motor runs low tens with a set of ported Eddy RPM heads and a low deck six pak, Comp Cams custom grind solid roller that is 260 @ .050 intake side,266 @ .050 exhaust with right at .700 net lift at the retainers using a set of Harland Sharp 1.6 rockers in my 3450 Lb Duster on M/T ET Street Radials Lots of ways to go, especially on cam selections. BTW I have a freind who used the Comp Cams XS290S in a street pump gas 496 C.I.stroker motor in a 1968 Charger with 3.23 and a 727, it is his wifes car and it runs mid elevens corked up IHTH
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
|
|