Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
rockers #843711
11/01/10 06:46 PM
11/01/10 06:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
6
65dragnet Offline OP
super stock
65dragnet  Offline OP
super stock
6

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
Are stock max wedge rockers worth anything ? Do they make good race rockers ?


E. Williams 65 Coronet 500 3400lbs w/d, 446, Indy EZ'S, A&A transbrake,Comp 650 lift cam, 6.50 @ 105 mph 1/8th 10.25 @ 130mph 1/4
Re: rockers [Re: 65dragnet] #843712
11/01/10 11:09 PM
11/01/10 11:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Yes, and Yes. Adjustable pallet tip rockers are not a bad thing and they can have some advantages over roller tip rockers. They are strong. They can have a weight advantage over roller tip rockers - not so much in over all weight, but where the weight is located. They do have a higher friction loss ( actually less of an issue with the new lubes out there ), but they are easier on valve stems due to a larger contact pattern than a roller tip rocker. Less moving parts in your valve train. That's always a good thing. And don't believe all that garb about all pallet style rockers not being up to their advertised ratios. That issue has nothing to do with the style of rocker.


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843713
11/02/10 07:09 AM
11/02/10 07:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
6
65dragnet Offline OP
super stock
65dragnet  Offline OP
super stock
6

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
Thanks Crizila ! I normally run Crane ductile iron and the stock max wedge actually look stronger. I have a perfect set of them and I'm contemplating trying them on my 499 lowdeck.


E. Williams 65 Coronet 500 3400lbs w/d, 446, Indy EZ'S, A&A transbrake,Comp 650 lift cam, 6.50 @ 105 mph 1/8th 10.25 @ 130mph 1/4
Re: rockers [Re: 65dragnet] #843714
11/02/10 08:10 AM
11/02/10 08:10 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
I would ask what lift cam... but for anything under
about .550 or so then yes use them

Re: rockers [Re: 65dragnet] #843715
11/02/10 01:49 PM
11/02/10 01:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,228
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,228
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

Thanks Crizila ! I normally run Crane ductile iron and the stock max wedge actually look stronger. I have a perfect set of them and I'm contemplating trying them on my 499 lowdeck.


I've check a lot of ductile iron rockers and none of them where anywhere close to perfect The ratio where all over the plce, some sets varied .130 from the lowest lift to the highest lift when checking at the retainers I have sent several sets(Crane, Ersin, stock OEM BB and SB as well as 426 Hemi and Iskys to Rocker Arm Specilaties in Cottowood,CA PH #530-378-1075 to have the rockers bushed, blueprinted and have the ratio corrected Many other racers looking to make all of there parts perffect(as you can make them) for blueprinting use them also The bushings alone will make them last forever and never gall again

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 11/03/10 02:07 AM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: rockers [Re: Cab_Burge] #843716
11/02/10 04:53 PM
11/02/10 04:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

Quote:

Thanks Crizila ! I normally run Crane ductile iron and the stock max wedge actually look stronger. I have a perfect set of them and I'm contemplating trying them on my 499 lowdeck.


I've check a lot of ductile iron rockers and none of them where anywhere close to perfect The ratio where all over the plce, some sets varied .130 from the lowest lift to the ighest lift when checking at the retainers I have sent several sets(Craen, ersoin, stock Mopars and Iskys to Rocker Arm Specilaties in Cottowood,CA PH #530-378-1075 to have the rockers bushed, blueprinted and have the ratio corrected Many other racers looking to make all of there parts perffect(as you can make them) for blueprinting use them also The bushings alone will make them last forever and never gall again


I sure don't claim to be an expert when it comes to rocker are geometry. Fortunately, for me, I happen to know someone who is. It's a very complicated topic, with much more going on than just the ratio change due to the travel arc of the rocker arm. For instance," the effective rocker arm ratio is related to the travel of the contact point accross the tip of the valve stem. The large raduis of the tip of a pallet tip style rocker arm or the larger diameter of the roller on a roller tip rocker arm, the greater the travel of the contact point accross the tip of the valve stem - - - and therefore the greater the change in the effective rocker arm ratio as the valve goes through an opening and closing cycle. Since, in general, pallet tip style rocker arms have a larger tip radii than roller tip style rocker arms ( as reflected in the diameter of the roller on the tip of the roller rocker arm), pallet tip style rocker arms undergo a larger change in effective rocker arm ratio than roller tip rockers ( through a valve opening and closing cycle )." A typical 1.5 stock chevy pallet style rocker ( which seems to be the one abused most by those selling roller rockers ) can check ( if ploted )anywhere from 1.4 to 1.7 ratio through it's travel arc. Another area that can effect ratio is the rocker arm fulcrum point as it relates to valve stem height. Most advocate they should be the same height. Wrong! Due to the change in dynamics ( rpm and cyl pressure - which is usually never measured or taken in to consideration ), there is no perfect relationship between the rocker fulcrum and the valve stem height, but - one that is better than the accepted "same height "is to place the rocker arm fulcrum 1/3 of the maximum valve lift below the tip of the valve stem. I told you this crap was complicated . I'm just touching on a few points here. I still use the 50/50 or half lift method ( per Lunati, Comp, and many others ) cause it's easier to do and seems to be good enough in most instances. Sorry for the rambling.


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: MR_P_BODY] #843717
11/02/10 05:49 PM
11/02/10 05:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
6
65dragnet Offline OP
super stock
65dragnet  Offline OP
super stock
6

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
Quote:

I would ask what lift cam... but for anything under
about .550 or so then yes use them



Mr. Pbody actually the cam is a 258/265 dur.@.050 with .587 lift @ 1.5


E. Williams 65 Coronet 500 3400lbs w/d, 446, Indy EZ'S, A&A transbrake,Comp 650 lift cam, 6.50 @ 105 mph 1/8th 10.25 @ 130mph 1/4
Re: rockers [Re: 65dragnet] #843718
11/02/10 06:04 PM
11/02/10 06:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
There is also a lot variance once the rocker is bolted down. If it a perfect 1.5 rocker on a test shaft it may not be a 1.5 when installed. The push rod angle and the plunger depth in the lifter all add up to surprising variances in rocker ratios. we have shimmed the plunger to our installed depth and then take rockers and physically matched them to get a matched set of the max ratio. It took 3 sets of a name brand to do it and the rest went back as an unused return.

Re: rockers [Re: MoparforLife] #843719
11/02/10 06:49 PM
11/02/10 06:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

There is also a lot variance once the rocker is bolted down. If it a perfect 1.5 rocker on a test shaft it may not be a 1.5 when installed. The push rod angle and the plunger depth in the lifter all add up to surprising variances in rocker ratios. we have shimmed the plunger to our installed depth and then take rockers and physically matched them to get a matched set of the max ratio. It took 3 sets of a name brand to do it and the rest went back as an unused return.


Yes, plunger depth can make a big difference in ratio - and for those that think the roller tip on a roller rocker actually rolls - well, at low rpm's they do. At high rpm's they "skid" cause they can't change direction fast enough.


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843720
11/02/10 07:20 PM
11/02/10 07:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 535
Ohio
racerAL Offline
mopar
racerAL  Offline
mopar

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 535
Ohio
well, i can't comment on/about the ratio of the max wedge rockers and i can't comment on how they vary..what i can comment on is the $100 set that i'm using(150 passes)seem to be holding up fine, and i've had NO issues with valve tip wear or rocker arm wear...if you end up not using them,and want to get rid of them, get ahold of me.. ..i would be interested in them.

6281799-IMG_2959.jpg (52 downloads)

-1967 Plymouth Satellite #3555
446 cid on E-85
best 1/4 et 10.577 @ 127.58
best 1/8 et 6.722 @ 100.68
best 60ft. 1.419
Re: rockers [Re: racerAL] #843721
11/02/10 08:23 PM
11/02/10 08:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
I'm not down on roller rockers. As Mr P Body said, if you are over .550 lift, a pallet tip rocker ( with it's large tip radius ) could be getting pretty close to the valve tip edge. I run roller rockers ( .615" lift ) for that exact reason. I'm sure some of the more high end roller rockers are more accurate ( regarding ratio ) also. Just saying that pallet tip rockers have their place, and are overly and unjustly "blacklisted".


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843722
11/02/10 09:58 PM
11/02/10 09:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Here is an excerpt from an article in a Mopar mag.:


Clean it, if it's Dirty. Oil it, if it Squeaks. But: Don't fix it, if it Works!
Re: rockers [Re: MoparforLife] #843723
11/02/10 11:17 PM
11/02/10 11:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
6
65dragnet Offline OP
super stock
65dragnet  Offline OP
super stock
6

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 716
Indiana
Thanks guys , lots of good input here .Maybe I should reconsider using them with the cam I have


E. Williams 65 Coronet 500 3400lbs w/d, 446, Indy EZ'S, A&A transbrake,Comp 650 lift cam, 6.50 @ 105 mph 1/8th 10.25 @ 130mph 1/4
Re: rockers [Re: MoparforLife] #843724
11/02/10 11:29 PM
11/02/10 11:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

Here is an excerpt from an article in a Mopar mag.:


1. Magazine tech "experts" are - limited - and usually in bed with the equipment manufacturer - for obvious reasons. I can't remember the last time a mag did an article on a "something" where it turned out to be a total turd. Big mistake to believe everything you read in a magazine.


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843725
11/03/10 12:02 AM
11/03/10 12:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Quote:

Quote:

Here is an excerpt from an article in a Mopar mag.:


1. Magazine tech "experts" are - limited - and usually in bed with the equipment manufacturer - for obvious reasons. I can't remember the last time a mag did an article on a "something" where it turned out to be a total turd. Big mistake to believe everything you read in a magazine.


This from our own Dulcich (sp). Besides it was backing up a lot of what you were saying.
Hughes has a tech space saying that (and I have known this) that the bottom small rollers are the only ones that do anything. the top ones never see any pressure because the action is back and forth action not spinning the rollers on to around to any pressure point. This true not only on the tips but on full roller rockers where the shafts have needle too.
BTW have you ever had to clean up small needle bearings after breakage. Not fun

Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843726
11/03/10 05:06 AM
11/03/10 05:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,943
Melbourne.....Oz-land
Moparmal Offline
master
Moparmal  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,943
Melbourne.....Oz-land
Quote:

Quote:

Here is an excerpt from an article in a Mopar mag.:


1. Magazine tech "experts" are - limited - and usually in bed with the equipment manufacturer - for obvious reasons. I can't remember the last time a mag did an article on a "something" where it turned out to be a total turd. Big mistake to believe everything you read in a magazine.




Crizila - You should read that article again - it actually supports what you were saying

- that after a certain lift height the factory paddle style has a limitation - but before that works very well.

Re: rockers [Re: Moparmal] #843727
11/03/10 09:16 AM
11/03/10 09:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
From Hughes: The needle bearing rockers are a fairly cost-effective solution but they have reduced life expectancy. All the pressure and shock in the valve train is concentrated on 1 or 2 needles at the most.


The rockers only rock in a small arc of approximately 25 or 30. If the rocker or the shaft actually rotated the needles would live longer. Here again is a conundrum. The smaller needles spread the load over more needles, but they are more fragile you just cant win! Some of the roller rockers even have needle rollers in the roller at the tip of the rocker. The unit loading is very high with needle bearings. All these extra parts are just more points of potential failure.

Re: rockers [Re: Moparmal] #843728
11/03/10 11:11 AM
11/03/10 11:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Here is an excerpt from an article in a Mopar mag.:


1. Magazine tech "experts" are - limited - and usually in bed with the equipment manufacturer - for obvious reasons. I can't remember the last time a mag did an article on a "something" where it turned out to be a total turd. Big mistake to believe everything you read in a magazine.




Crizila - You should read that article again - it actually supports what you were saying

- that after a certain lift height the factory paddle style has a limitation - but before that works very well.


Sorry, I was just looking at the ratio issue.


Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843729
11/03/10 12:28 PM
11/03/10 12:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
rocker ratio testing tool.

6282926-rockertester.jpg (51 downloads)

Fastest 300
Re: rockers [Re: Crizila] #843730
11/03/10 12:52 PM
11/03/10 12:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Quote:

rocker ratio testing tool.


Looks like a good tool but will it make compensation for push rod angle? It is a lot of work but we do it right on the engine with a lifter shimmed solid at the preload we are using. Very time consuming but about as accurate as you can get per application.


Clean it, if it's Dirty. Oil it, if it Squeaks. But: Don't fix it, if it Works!
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1