|
|
Re: Exhaust Manifolds
[Re: bron_engines]
#836270
10/22/10 04:28 PM
10/22/10 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,163
CT
GTX MATT
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,163
CT
|
I know a guy running B body HP manifolds on a 440 in a '68 Dart. On the driver side the manifold comes awfully close to the steering column and cooks the nylon bushing in the end of it though.
Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat
Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
|
|
|
Re: Exhaust Manifolds
[Re: GTX MATT]
#836271
10/22/10 04:37 PM
10/22/10 04:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I know a guy running B body HP manifolds on a 440 in a '68 Dart. On the driver side the manifold comes awfully close to the steering column and cooks the nylon bushing in the end of it though.
The column needs to be cut back to flush wit hthe firewall and the bushing moved up and it should be ok .
Since the OP has a low deck he could use the 68-69 C body HP manifold , it will work with a little creative pipe bending, I put one on my 383 with a factory BB K and I couldn't see any reason it would not work and wouldn't be any more restrictive than the factory manifold .
|
|
|
Re: Exhaust Manifolds
[Re: JohnRR]
#836273
10/22/10 10:10 PM
10/22/10 10:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
|
Quote:
Since the OP has a low deck he could use the 68-69 C body HP manifold , it will work with a little creative pipe bending, I put one on my 383 with a factory BB K and I couldn't see any reason it would not work and wouldn't be any more restrictive than the factory manifold .
That's good to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
