Re: full frame/rolling chassic for darts or cudas?
[Re: dirt]
#632892
03/07/10 02:25 PM
03/07/10 02:25 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
A full frame setup is not "something better". It's a step back in technology and not one for the better.
But to answer your question, nobody sells what you are asking for, which is not to say someone did make one when faced with a rotted out factory setup.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: full frame/rolling chassis for darts or cudas?
[Re: DRJDVM]
#632908
03/18/10 08:30 PM
03/18/10 08:30 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
If you think a triangulated 4 link and an MII front suspension is "modern" and a major inprovement over torsion bars and leafs you'd be wrong. There is more than just weight that makes a unit body better than a body on frame, structural strength and body stiffness come to mind. The body on frame setup is strong in two dimensions, allowing more flex. Unit body vehicles are stronger in all three, resisting flex better. Even your race car example is more like a unit body in terms of dimensional strength than it is a body on frame.
But hey, it's your $13k not mine.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
|
|