|
Re: Newer style 904 converter with small snout
[Re: XXX440]
#632524
03/06/10 10:44 PM
03/06/10 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
There is a third way, a later crankshaft.
Other than that, those are your options
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Newer style 904 converter with small snout
[Re: XXX440]
#632525
03/06/10 10:58 PM
03/06/10 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I'll defer to Kunkel for the final word on this but I believe that the later (larger) input shaft (reaction shaft maybe larger too?) required the larger TC "nose" so if that is correct then that'd leave one option left, if the earlier input and or reaction shaft(s)/pump will fit in the later trans or as said swap cranks which I dont think you want to do.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Newer style 904 converter with small snout
[Re: RapidRobert]
#632528
03/07/10 02:33 AM
03/07/10 02:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,207 Park Forest, IL
slantzilla
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,207
Park Forest, IL
|
Continental used to make a large spline/small snout stock stall converter for around $200. A few guys on the Slant board had them made.
"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
|
|
|
|
|
|