|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: 383man]
#471807
09/19/09 12:23 PM
09/19/09 12:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
These tires in my sig pic were the 29 x 11.5 Hoosier QTP tires. They just rub to much on turns. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 09/21/09 01:34 AM.
|
|
|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: Blues_Cuda]
#471809
09/19/09 05:11 PM
09/19/09 05:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716 Baltimore/Denver
64Post
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
|
Quote:
We've always run either 29.5x9.0 or 30x9.0 slicks on our '64 Savoy using a 15x8 wheel w/ 4.5" backspacing.
These are 30x9.0 Firestones in this pic.
Scott, do the Cal Tracs prevent you from running a wider tire?
|
|
|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: 64Post]
#471810
09/19/09 09:25 PM
09/19/09 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896 St. Louis, MO
Blues_Cuda
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896
St. Louis, MO
|
Quote:
Quote:
We've always run either 29.5x9.0 or 30x9.0 slicks on our '64 Savoy using a 15x8 wheel w/ 4.5" backspacing.
These are 30x9.0 Firestones in this pic.
Scott, do the Cal Tracs prevent you from running a wider tire?
No.
The slicks come close to the wheel lip on the drivers side. I think we had to do some slight trimming actually. The Firestone slicks rubbed the leaf spring a little bit too. Not bad by any means though. Those Firestones balloon out a lot for only being a 9" wide tire. We will be running 30x9.0 M/T ET Drags the next time we take it to the track.
It's a '68 B-Body Dana in the stock spring location.
How have you been doing Dave?
|
|
|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: Blues_Cuda]
#471812
09/21/09 10:22 AM
09/21/09 10:22 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 409 Texas
mprhound
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 409
Texas
|
Quote:
We've always run either 29.5x9.0 or 30x9.0 slicks on our '64 Savoy using a 15x8 wheel w/ 4.5" backspacing.
These are 30x9.0 Firestones in this pic.
What rear springs are you running mono-leaf or stock style?
|
|
|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: mprhound]
#471813
09/22/09 10:47 PM
09/22/09 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896 St. Louis, MO
Blues_Cuda
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896
St. Louis, MO
|
Quote:
I am running a 67 b body width rearend, should give me a hair more room on the wheel lip side, you did not have any problems with the 30 inch tire getting into the wheel well in the front?
It's close on ours, but it has never hit the front.
|
|
|
Re: slick size early b body?
[Re: mprhound]
#471814
09/22/09 10:48 PM
09/22/09 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896 St. Louis, MO
Blues_Cuda
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,896
St. Louis, MO
|
Quote:
Quote:
We've always run either 29.5x9.0 or 30x9.0 slicks on our '64 Savoy using a 15x8 wheel w/ 4.5" backspacing.
These are 30x9.0 Firestones in this pic.
What rear springs are you running mono-leaf or stock style?
Stock-style springs made by St. Louis Spring. We'll get some mono-leafs on there one day.
|
|
|
|
|
|