Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
iron versus aluminum #442575
08/19/09 04:34 AM
08/19/09 04:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 79
grant louisiana
M
mayhem148 Offline OP
member
mayhem148  Offline OP
member
M

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 79
grant louisiana
for the after market blocks what would be a better choice. what holds up better. advantages and disadvantages. can aluminum blocks really be rebuilt after some explosions or catostrophic failure.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: mayhem148] #442576
08/19/09 07:29 AM
08/19/09 07:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 866
Winnipeg ,Mb. CA.
chryco Offline
super stock
chryco  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 866
Winnipeg ,Mb. CA.
Ally blocks KB at least have superior strength as well as optimized oiling compared to iron . They are easier to repair not to mention the weight savings.

5426832-MVC-005S.jpg (76 downloads)

Gas is fer washin' parts ....Alky`s fer drinkin' ...Nitro`s fer Racin'!
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: mayhem148] #442577
08/19/09 07:56 AM
08/19/09 07:56 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
B
blownzoom440 Offline
blownzoom440  Offline
B

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
the budget then intended use determined my decision to get an iron block and the quality of the KP440.thanks for posting the question.it should be technicly interesting.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: mayhem148] #442578
08/19/09 08:57 AM
08/19/09 08:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Aluminum is light, easily repairable if windowed, and you can resleeve if you hurt a cylinder. The ONLY downside is the cost.

Cast iron is heavy, it's a boat anchor if you window it, sure you CAN sleeve it, but not like an aluminum block.

In my opinion, if you have the money...there is only one way to go. That's why I have a KB block in my cuda. CHIP


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: an8sec70cuda] #442579
08/19/09 09:35 AM
08/19/09 09:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Aluminum is light, easily repairable if windowed, and you can resleeve if you hurt a cylinder. The ONLY downside is the cost.

Cast iron is heavy, it's a boat anchor if you window it, sure you CAN sleeve it, but not like an aluminum block.

In my opinion, if you have the money...there is only one way to go. That's why I have a KB block in my cuda. CHIP




I agree. There may be some here chime in about thermo/power loss. That's all BS. There may be some cylinder movement that can slightly affect ring seal but it's minimal compared to the advantages aluminum has over iron.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: an8sec70cuda] #442580
08/19/09 02:51 PM
08/19/09 02:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 627
IN
B
BIG BEAR Offline
mopar
BIG BEAR  Offline
mopar
B

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 627
IN
Quote:

Aluminum is light, easily repairable if windowed, and you can resleeve if you hurt a cylinder. The ONLY downside is the cost.

Cast iron is heavy, it's a boat anchor if you window it, sure you CAN sleeve it, but not like an aluminum block.

In my opinion, if you have the money...there is only one way to go. That's why I have a KB block in my cuda. CHIP





Do you think that alumium is as strong as iron?

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: BIG BEAR] #442581
08/19/09 02:57 PM
08/19/09 02:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 761
KY
J
juicedcuda Offline
super stock
juicedcuda  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 761
KY
And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda 1970 Plum Crazy "Gold Duster" 1973 Gold Duster
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: BobR] #442582
08/19/09 04:05 PM
08/19/09 04:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,173
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,173
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

Quote:

Aluminum is light, easily repairable if windowed, and you can resleeve if you hurt a cylinder. The ONLY downside is the cost.

Cast iron is heavy, it's a boat anchor if you window it, sure you CAN sleeve it, but not like an aluminum block.

In my opinion, if you have the money...there is only one way to go. That's why I have a KB block in my cuda. CHIP




I agree. There may be some here chime in about thermo/power loss. That's all BS. There may be some cylinder movement that can slightly affect ring seal but it's minimal compared to the advantages aluminum has over iron.


If your running a N/A motor with NO power adders then the aluminum may be the way to go, maybe not if you can't afford to lose a certian amount percentage wise of the total HP attainable. MY example is Pro Stock, they can run any block material they want, once they lobby NHRA for it, and all of them are using Compact Graphite Iron blocks not aluminum


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: Cab_Burge] #442583
08/19/09 04:15 PM
08/19/09 04:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 705
Michigan
H
Hemiroid Offline
super stock
Hemiroid  Offline
super stock
H

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 705
Michigan
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Aluminum is light, easily repairable if windowed, and you can resleeve if you hurt a cylinder. The ONLY downside is the cost.

Cast iron is heavy, it's a boat anchor if you window it, sure you CAN sleeve it, but not like an aluminum block.

In my opinion, if you have the money...there is only one way to go. That's why I have a KB block in my cuda. CHIP




I agree. There may be some here chime in about thermo/power loss. That's all BS. There may be some cylinder movement that can slightly affect ring seal but it's minimal compared to the advantages aluminum has over iron.


If your running a N/A motor with NO power adders then the aluminum may be the way to go, maybe not if you can't afford to lose a certian amount percentage wise of the total HP attainable. MY example is Pro Stock, they can run any block material they want, once they lobby NHRA for it, and all of them are using Compact Graphite Iron blocks not aluminum




If you're running a n/a motor that's not heads up, then the aluminum is probably the way to go. Even in a heads up situation, taking that weight off of the nose of the car and the overall weight savings coupled with repairability probably make aluminum the best choice even with the slight loss of hp in the ring seal. The new world iron blocks, without cnc lightening weigh like 200 lbs more than a alum block!

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: Cab_Burge] #442584
08/19/09 04:19 PM
08/19/09 04:19 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864
IN
Irun5snd8th Offline
master
Irun5snd8th  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864
IN
A very smart class racer tells me that a iron block with aluminum heads will always make more power than an aluminum block and heads with the same parts because the aluminum acts as heat sink for the iron. That being said he says the aluminum block goes faster in the car cause it weighs less. This may explain the pro stockers cause they have a minimum weight and just need the power.


AFCO, Rons Fuel Injection sponsored Dodge Challenger Mention Street Lethal Motorsports
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: juicedcuda] #442585
08/19/09 05:01 PM
08/19/09 05:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
No problems cruising an aluminum block on the street. Most of the cars on the road today have aluminum blocks. Mine's been on the street and strip for 3+ years w/ no problems.

All the pro mods I've seen run aluminum blocks. They are billet, but still aluminum. My good friend has a big NASTY BB Chevy ex pro mod motor that's a cast aluminum block. Another good friend has a 540" Jim Oddy blower motor that made some ridiculous power... aluminum block.

The CGI blocks may be the best for making power, but the majority of the time you'd rather have the weight savings of aluminum.
Regular cast iron really shouldn't be an option for you unless cost is a factor. CHIP


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: an8sec70cuda] #442586
08/19/09 10:12 PM
08/19/09 10:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 79
grant louisiana
M
mayhem148 Offline OP
member
mayhem148  Offline OP
member
M

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 79
grant louisiana
i just dont know about the natural-A situation. ive seen alot boost put to LS blocks. and they hold up just fine. i kinda feel if you put this much money into a hotrod than you shouldnt be to worried about cost. im worried about goin faster. and i belive in the weight saving deal. if im gonna spend a couple grand on a block than im gonna get the best i can. its not how "reliable" can you make your hotrod its how FAST can you make your hotrod.
aluminum=less weight=faster=

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: juicedcuda] #442587
08/19/09 10:29 PM
08/19/09 10:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
B
blownzoom440 Offline
blownzoom440  Offline
B

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: blownzoom440] #442588
08/20/09 08:11 AM
08/20/09 08:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: an8sec70cuda] #442589
08/20/09 09:07 AM
08/20/09 09:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
B
blownzoom440 Offline
blownzoom440  Offline
B

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP



my point was about the pressed in sleeves possably leaking if nothing else over time.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: blownzoom440] #442590
08/20/09 09:14 AM
08/20/09 09:14 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP



my point was about the pressed in sleeves possably leaking if nothing else over time.




Aluminum blocks are every bit as reliable as iron. All the GM LS1, LS2, LS6 and LS7 blocks are aluminum. Many of the import high perf blocks are aluminum as well. I have an aluminum block on my Cobra replica-4 years and running with zero problems. The NHRA pro stock guys use compacted graphite blocks but the IHRA guys all use aluminum for their mountain motors.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: BobR] #442591
08/20/09 09:27 AM
08/20/09 09:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
B
blownzoom440 Offline
blownzoom440  Offline
B

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP



my point was about the pressed in sleeves possably leaking if nothing else over time.




Aluminum blocks are every bit as reliable as iron. All the GM LS1, LS2, LS6 and LS7 blocks are aluminum. Many of the import high perf blocks are aluminum as well. I have an aluminum block on my Cobra replica-4 years and running with zero problems. The NHRA pro stock guys use compacted graphite blocks but the IHRA guys all use aluminum for their mountain motors.



you did not name 1 mopar block[aluminum aftermarket].i am not trying to argue but learn from this post.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: blownzoom440] #442592
08/20/09 09:37 AM
08/20/09 09:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP



my point was about the pressed in sleeves possably leaking if nothing else over time.




Aluminum blocks are every bit as reliable as iron. All the GM LS1, LS2, LS6 and LS7 blocks are aluminum. Many of the import high perf blocks are aluminum as well. I have an aluminum block on my Cobra replica-4 years and running with zero problems. The NHRA pro stock guys use compacted graphite blocks but the IHRA guys all use aluminum for their mountain motors.



you did not name 1 mopar block[aluminum aftermarket].i am not trying to argue but learn from this post.




Holds true for these as well. A couple have vouched for their aluminum block's integrity. My post was just vouching for the integrity of aluminum in general.

http://www.jimsautoparts.com/mopar_performance_blocks.htm

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: BobR] #442593
08/20/09 10:02 AM
08/20/09 10:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
B
blownzoom440 Offline
blownzoom440  Offline
B

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
to cover a viable % of people who can vouch for there leak resistance i dont think there are enough people on this site who will chime in with the info.naturaly we hear of the 1s that have problems on the net.thanks for the link.

Re: iron versus aluminum [Re: blownzoom440] #442594
08/20/09 10:02 AM
08/20/09 10:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And is there any problems just cruising an aluminum block on the street?




and just because a handfull of people did it does not mean it is reliable.





Why isn't it reliable? Please, do tell? CHIP



my point was about the pressed in sleeves possably leaking if nothing else over time.




The old aluminum blocks had wet sleeves with O-rings that sometimes leaked. Not anymore, they now use dry sleeves and have done so for many years. So no worries about leaking water. CHIP


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1