piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
#347402
06/14/09 11:36 PM
06/14/09 11:36 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314 Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
dave571
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314
Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
|
OK My buddy is putting his 451 together. When we roll it over, the comp height is good, etc, PROBLEM is that the piston skirt just touches the crank counter weghts almost dead on at BDC. It seems to be about .004" interferance. The skirt is quite thin there, so we were going to have a little machined off. How much clearance should there be there? .020? ,030? Thanks!
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: dave571]
#347403
06/15/09 02:47 AM
06/15/09 02:47 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
minimum .120 at any forced angle. (simulate piston rock at/near BDC)
Last edited by DRAM_Perf_Only; 06/15/09 04:24 AM.
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: 440Jim]
#347405
06/15/09 11:01 PM
06/15/09 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314 Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
dave571
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314
Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
|
counterweights are still stock 440
Block is clearanced for this already, and the crank turns fine without a rod/piston on it.
When the rod and piston is on, I believe it is on the skirt, near the pin boss.(I haven't seen the marks myself) but I do know that the piston was almost a BDC. It just touches enough to stop the rotation.
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: dave571]
#347406
06/16/09 12:20 AM
06/16/09 12:20 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
if it's not balanced yet, i'd cam cut the counterweights. that leaves the skirt alone and reduces rotating mass.
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
#347408
06/17/09 11:49 PM
06/17/09 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314 Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
dave571
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314
Carstairs, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
if it's not balanced yet, i'd cam cut the counterweights. that leaves the skirt alone and reduces rotating mass.
I agree, but it has been balanced.
That's why we are thinking the skirt. It is very thin where it contacts, and the amount of material would be very little.
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: dave571]
#347409
06/18/09 12:42 AM
06/18/09 12:42 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The guy acroos the street did that with his BBC in his boat.just ground enought off the piston under the pin so the crank didnt hit.Somehow when it ran it hit.It only pulled the pins out of 4 or 5 pistons.On its first day on the water. So yeah by all means dont cut the crank and rebalance it save your money for your next motor
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: BILLYJAY]
#347410
06/18/09 02:27 AM
06/18/09 02:27 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,880 USA
Ron Silva
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,880
USA
|
Most Crank builders do not cam cut the counterweights any more. I think Moldex still does. Of course they don't care because they can charge you more to balance (mallory metal)
If you think about the shape of the piston you might be able to just Chamfer the counterweights and get the clearance you need and even that could be done on an as needed basis similar to a cam cut.
SRT DEMON ONE SEAT
|
|
|
Re: piston skirt to crank clearance, help engine guru's
[Re: 440Jim]
#347412
06/18/09 08:27 PM
06/18/09 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,942 NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,942
NC
|
This is from a post a few years ago:
As far as counterweights hitting the piston at the bottom of the stroke, the typical problem is the piston pin boss, ie metal below the piston pin. This thickness varies a lot from one piston design to the next. My Ross 99496 pistons have 0.150", Wiseco K296A35 have 0.220", my Venolias have 0.180" (see attachment). Everything must be checked at assembly for clearance, but this is the math:
CWmax = Counter Weight max dia Pthick= Piston thickness below the pin Pin = Piston pin dia Rod = Rod Length
CWmax = 2(Rod - Stroke/2 - Pin/2 - Pthick - Clearance) For example:
CWmax = 2(6.535 - 4.25/2 - 0.990/2 - 0.180 - 0.075) CWmax = 2(6.535 - 2.125 - 0.495 - 0.180 - 0.075 ) CWmax = 7.32" dia
That happens to be the dia of the "cam cut" on a Callies 4.25" stroke crank counterweight for a BB Mopar.
With a 6.535" long rod, 4.500" stroke and assuming the Ross 0.150" and 0.060 clearance: CWmax = 2(6.535 - 4.500/2 - 0.990/2 - 0.150 - 0.060) CWmax = 2(6.535 - 2.250 - 0.495 - 0.150 - 0.060) CWmax = 7.16" dia
That should work depending on the bobweight. I cut my Callies 4.250" down to 7.14" with a 2185 gram bobweight.
But with a 6.385" long rod and assuming the Ross 0.150" and 0.060 clearance: CWmax = 2(6.385 - 4.25/2 - 0.990/2 - 0.150 - 0.060) CWmax = 2(6.385 - 2.125 - 0.495 - 0.150 - 0.060) CWmax = 7.11" dia
The rest of the counterweight can be larger since it isn't at BDC. Balancing will need to be addressed with those counterweights. It might work, but I like the 6.535" rod for that. My Callies was cam cut from the factory at 7.55"/7.32", but I cut it down to 7.14" dia (round) and balanced at 2185 gram bobweight. The balance shop went between the lathe and the balancer to get this close, don't just use my dia with other cranks and bobweights.
|
|
|
|
|