Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
440Source Crankshaft journal diameters are spot on #3210779
02/05/24 11:36 AM
02/05/24 11:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
19_Dart_68 Offline OP
member
19_Dart_68  Offline OP
member

Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
Is this the norm or did I get a bad one? 440 stroker crank, 4.25" stroke, 2.7500 Mains, BB Chevy rod journal size - 2.2000"

All mains are undersized...none measure 2.750" and some are .0007 - .0008" too small
the first 3 rod journals (starting at the front) are spot on at 2.2000", the rest are all undersized...some as much as .0008"

I don't have the notebook next to me to give the exact measurements, but damn....not really what I was expecting from a brand new crankshaft.

Any similar experiences? or is this a fluke?


Last edited by 19_Dart_68; 02/06/24 11:35 PM.

68 Dart - 440 Swap in Progress...please stand by
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210789
02/05/24 11:58 AM
02/05/24 11:58 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 34,883
S.E. South Dakota !
bigdad Offline
Still Posting A Lot
bigdad  Offline
Still Posting A Lot

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 34,883
S.E. South Dakota !


Mike@440Source

however, Southern California is getting very bad weather might be tough to reach.


The lips of fools bring them strife, and their mouths invite a beating.Proverbs 18:6
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210799
02/05/24 12:18 PM
02/05/24 12:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Sounds like someone had a bad day setting up the grinder. Not a fun problem to have since there is no easy solution. You can polish then mix and match bearings, or send it out for regrind, or send it back. None of those options are great.

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: AndyF] #3210811
02/05/24 12:50 PM
02/05/24 12:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
rickseeman Offline
master
rickseeman  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
Doesn't sound good. Somethings are frustrating. But if it was 2.750" (stock, which would give you stock clearance, which nobody says is enough) then you would be coming on here posting "Where can I get bearings with more clearance." Mock it up and see what your clearances are. Then decide if you're upset. My guess is you aren't going to feel as bad. This isn't the 70's. We don't just put the bearings in without checking anything and slap it back together. We're measuring in tenths now. (As shown in your original post.) Juggling bearings is part of building something today.


2011 Drag Pak Challenger
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210820
02/05/24 01:17 PM
02/05/24 01:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,109
Byron, NY
W.I.N. Racing Offline
top fuel
W.I.N. Racing  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,109
Byron, NY
I'd send it back...with the only alterative being that all similar journals be re-finished (polish or grind) to the same size. On top of that you didn't pay for a "blem" crank why would you accept one. Defiantly would not mix and match bearing sizes though...too easy to mess things up when the parts are correct. twocents


'01 P1500, Blown/Inj BAE,/Veney ,Bruno/CS2,Dana 60
'01 Dodge 3500 S Cummins Auto, Fresh air kit, 4" Exhaust,
'05 Dodge Magnum R/T - Too Much to list
'60 Willys CJ5
'01 International LPX - Project,DT466, Allison
'64 Plymouth Valiant, Inj 528 Hemi, 2spd
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: W.I.N. Racing] #3210827
02/05/24 01:40 PM
02/05/24 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
rickseeman Offline
master
rickseeman  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
If it will make you feel better, the last Callies Magnum crank I got from Ray Barton was, I believe, .0008" under on the mains and .0006" under on the rods. Yes, I wish it was standard like you do. But I assume he orders them this way so it will have bearing clearance. If the crank is standard, your clearance is going to standard, and nobody want things that tight anymore.


2011 Drag Pak Challenger
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210830
02/05/24 01:53 PM
02/05/24 01:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292
NY
challenger451ci Offline
enthusiast
challenger451ci  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 292
NY
Originally Posted by 19_Dart_68
Is this the norm or did I get a bad one? 440 stroker crank, 4.25" stroke, 2.7500 Mains, BB Chevy rod journal size - 2.2000"

All mains are undersized...none measure 2.750" and some are .0007 - .0008" too small
the first 3 rod journals (starting at the front) are spot on at 2.2000", the rest are all undersized...some as much as .0008"

I don't have the notebook next to me to give the exact measurements, but damn....not really what I was expecting from a brand new crankshaft.

Any similar experiences? or is this a fluke?



My Callies crank measures between 2.7491" and 2.7494" on the mains and 2.1993" and 2.1994" on the rods. Doesn't seem like 0.0007" or 0.0008" under the nominal would be out of line?? I wouldn't expect the journals to measure right on the nominal dimension.
You might have to use half of an 0.001" under or 0.001" over bearing to get the clearances where you need them. I can't remember the last time I built a motor only using one set of bearings. I have a shelf of left over half shells... smile

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: challenger451ci] #3210835
02/05/24 02:39 PM
02/05/24 02:39 PM
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
19_Dart_68 Offline OP
member
19_Dart_68  Offline OP
member

Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by challenger451ci

My Callies crank measures between 2.7491" and 2.7494" on the mains and 2.1993" and 2.1994" on the rods. Doesn't seem like 0.0007" or 0.0008" under the nominal would be out of line?? I wouldn't expect the journals to measure right on the nominal dimension.
You might have to use half of an 0.001" under or 0.001" over bearing to get the clearances where you need them. I can't remember the last time I built a motor only using one set of bearings. I have a shelf of left over half shells... smile



That's pretty much what mine looks like.


68 Dart - 440 Swap in Progress...please stand by
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210845
02/05/24 03:43 PM
02/05/24 03:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498
PA
moparacer Offline
top fuel
moparacer  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498
PA
Send back and get a Molnar?

My Molnar crank was spot on when we built my engine. No fudging bearing sizes to get clearance. Engine builder even commented on how nice it was. Can't say that about the other budget cranks we have used over the years.

Just have to use chamfered mains.

Last edited by moparacer; 02/05/24 03:43 PM.

67 Barracuda street/bracket car 11.27-119
68 Dart 502 BB 8.70s-152
414 cid SB Dragster 7.65-174
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: moparacer] #3210871
02/05/24 04:50 PM
02/05/24 04:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
Originally Posted by moparacer
Send back and get a Molnar?

My Molnar crank was spot on when we built my engine. No fudging bearing sizes to get clearance. Engine builder even commented on how nice it was. Can't say that about the other budget cranks we have used over the years.

Just have to use chamfered mains.


Same!


'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210872
02/05/24 04:51 PM
02/05/24 04:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
I would much rather have them to small than a TINY bit to BIG
Next step is to install and torque the main bearings and see what the I.D. is on all five bearings, same thing on the rods, torque them up and see what the I.D. is and then do the math for oil clearances. I like .0025+ on the rods and .0030 + on the mains twocents
I use the narrow full groove Seal Power truck main bearings and what ever brand rod bearings I have in stock that give me those rods bearing clearances I want, I have been using a lot of King brand rod bearings this past two years shruggy scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3210945
02/05/24 09:12 PM
02/05/24 09:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Crank journals tend to vary, some more than others. The guy I work with fits bearings all the time. Sometimes he'll polish the crank to get it to the right spot, sometimes he mix and matches bearings halves to get the correct clearance. That is just how it is these days. You can send the crank back but there is no guarantee that the next one will be any better and you'll be out $200 for shipping plus a couple of weeks of shop time.

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: AndyF] #3211048
02/06/24 09:16 AM
02/06/24 09:16 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
Less than .001 difference ... hardly worth losing sleep over.

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: Stanton] #3211050
02/06/24 09:24 AM
02/06/24 09:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,173
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,173
PA.


Most guys can’t measure .001 let alone .0002


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: pittsburghracer] #3211058
02/06/24 10:18 AM
02/06/24 10:18 AM
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
19_Dart_68 Offline OP
member
19_Dart_68  Offline OP
member

Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 31
Pennsylvania
Thanks for all the great info, gents. It is much appreciated!


68 Dart - 440 Swap in Progress...please stand by
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: 19_Dart_68] #3211062
02/06/24 10:26 AM
02/06/24 10:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,173
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,173
PA.
Originally Posted by 19_Dart_68
Thanks for all the great info, gents. It is much appreciated!




So what are you going to do.


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: pittsburghracer] #3211064
02/06/24 10:29 AM
02/06/24 10:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022
MN
J
JERICOGTX Offline
I Live Here
JERICOGTX  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022
MN
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer


Most guys can’t measure .001 let alone .0002


That's like picking fly sh!t out of pepper...


69 GTX 68 Road Runner
Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: rickseeman] #3211066
02/06/24 10:32 AM
02/06/24 10:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB Offline
master
HardcoreB  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
Originally Posted by rickseeman
Doesn't sound good. Somethings are frustrating. But if it was 2.750" (stock, which would give you stock clearance, which nobody says is enough) then you would be coming on here posting "Where can I get bearings with more clearance." Mock it up and see what your clearances are. Then decide if you're upset. My guess is you aren't going to feel as bad. This isn't the 70's. We don't just put the bearings in without checking anything and slap it back together. We're measuring in tenths now. (As shown in your original post.) Juggling bearings is part of building something today.
X2!!!

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: HardcoreB] #3211068
02/06/24 10:36 AM
02/06/24 10:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB Offline
master
HardcoreB  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
I'm wondering if this was THE CHEAPEST crank he could buy? Recently, I measured an Ohio and it was pretty consistent FWIW. They also have a good pricepoint.

Re: 440 Source Crankshaft journal diameters are very different. [Re: rickseeman] #3211076
02/06/24 11:07 AM
02/06/24 11:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022
MN
J
JERICOGTX Offline
I Live Here
JERICOGTX  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022
MN
Originally Posted by rickseeman
Juggling bearings is part of building something today.


My engine uses half KING rod bearings, and half Clevites.


69 GTX 68 Road Runner
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1