Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: cudaman1969] #3209267
01/30/24 06:11 PM
01/30/24 06:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
Blacked out pic

IMG_3466.jpeg
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: cudaman1969] #3209334
01/30/24 09:25 PM
01/30/24 09:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
Do not use them together tsk twocents
I know several NHRA stock class racer that did that and had very bad results with them puke whiney Save yourself some misery and learn from others bad experiences up


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: cudaman1969] #3209349
01/30/24 10:04 PM
01/30/24 10:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
This is some of the info I’m looking for, thanks to all so far. Wanting to know what happens if using the two together, yes I have the rancho shocks plus the adjustable fronts, also no factory rubber bushings in front, lca, uca and strut, very free moving. 9” radials 5.13 gears 4600 dynamic vert low gear 904. Frame tied and cm cage, front to back


That's gonna sing on the top end. My IHRA Stock crate motor combo was maxed out with 4.86 gears, 4400 converter that flashed 49-54 footbraking, depending on weather, and weighing 3,540. Other specs appear the same or very similar.

I think you'll be happier in the long run with a full Cal-Trac set-up. Mixing parts will likely cause a steeper learning curve to adjust and difficulty in optimizing it, even if you use matching leaf springs instead of bias SS versions. Cal-Trac leaf springs will obviously reduce weight and may last longer than SS springs. Less adjustments as springs get old. But I haven't tried Cal-Tracs w/SS springs or know anyone who has.

Re: Super stock spring question [Re: Locomotion] #3209395
01/31/24 12:30 AM
01/31/24 12:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,237
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted by Locomotion
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
This is some of the info I’m looking for, thanks to all so far. Wanting to know what happens if using the two together, yes I have the rancho shocks plus the adjustable fronts, also no factory rubber bushings in front, lca, uca and strut, very free moving. 9” radials 5.13 gears 4600 dynamic vert low gear 904. Frame tied and cm cage, front to back


That's gonna sing on the top end. My IHRA Stock crate motor combo was maxed out with 4.86 gears, 4400 converter that flashed 49-54 footbraking, depending on weather, and weighing 3,540. Other specs appear the same or very similar.

I think you'll be happier in the long run with a full Cal-Trac set-up. Mixing parts will likely cause a steeper learning curve to adjust and difficulty in optimizing it, even if you use matching leaf springs instead of bias SS versions. Cal-Trac leaf springs will obviously reduce weight and may last longer than SS springs. Less adjustments as springs get old. But I haven't tried Cal-Tracs w/SS springs or know anyone who has.

What I want to hear and will probably go with 4.88 and S/S springs (I’ll make up a snubber)

Re: Super stock spring question [Re: cudaman1969] #3209445
01/31/24 11:01 AM
01/31/24 11:01 AM
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,267
Denver, CO
B
BigBlockGTS Offline
pro stock
BigBlockGTS  Offline
pro stock
B

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,267
Denver, CO
Do a search in the archives. This has been tried multiple times by multiple people and they all reported back that it didn't work. Just get some stock springs for the cal tracs or their split monos and you'll be on your way.

Re: Super stock spring question [Re: cudaman1969] #3209695
02/01/24 12:49 AM
02/01/24 12:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,127
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
Originally Posted by Locomotion
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
This is some of the info I’m looking for, thanks to all so far. Wanting to know what happens if using the two together, yes I have the rancho shocks plus the adjustable fronts, also no factory rubber bushings in front, lca, uca and strut, very free moving. 9” radials 5.13 gears 4600 dynamic vert low gear 904. Frame tied and cm cage, front to back


That's gonna sing on the top end. My IHRA Stock crate motor combo was maxed out with 4.86 gears, 4400 converter that flashed 49-54 footbraking, depending on weather, and weighing 3,540. Other specs appear the same or very similar.

I think you'll be happier in the long run with a full Cal-Trac set-up. Mixing parts will likely cause a steeper learning curve to adjust and difficulty in optimizing it, even if you use matching leaf springs instead of bias SS versions. Cal-Trac leaf springs will obviously reduce weight and may last longer than SS springs. Less adjustments as springs get old. But I haven't tried Cal-Tracs w/SS springs or know anyone who has.

What I want to hear and will probably go with 4.88 and S/S springs (I’ll make up a snubber)
You don't need a pinion snubber with Mopar SS rear leaf springs, the snubber never gets close to the floorboard tunnel under acceleration with those springs as long as you have the pinion angle set up close to proper for drag racing: scope:


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: GomangoCuda] #3209850
02/01/24 05:52 PM
02/01/24 05:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,763
Walton's Mountain, Pa
Steve1118 Offline
master
Steve1118  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,763
Walton's Mountain, Pa
With an auto you should be OK without a snubber, the 4 speed cars used tthem. I sort of made my own short one just as a safety issue. Been running SS springs for 50 years, still do. Wound up messing with clamps on the front segment, two on the right, one on the left. Hooks hard and goes down through there like a New Yorker.

Big Steve Parsons reae shot.jpg

"Old age and treachery trumps youth and enthusiasm, every time!"

East Central Director / Chrysler Power Magazine

www.reasbeckracing.webs.com
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: Steve1118] #3209861
02/01/24 07:43 PM
02/01/24 07:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,008
South Park, Pa.
68LAR Offline
master
68LAR  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,008
South Park, Pa.
My car is a factory 4 speed car. I currently run A body SS springs. (002-003). Bin on the car for well over 30 years. NO snubber. Rear shocks are set tight on the rebound, loose on compression. Front shocks are 90/10’s. Car weighs close to 4k with me in it. It 60’fts in the 1.5 range. Snubbers are not needed with SS springs. The front segment is so stiff, it acts like traction bars. Just my 2 cents.


4 speed street legal. Best time 10.99 @ 124 mph on 93 octane pump gas @ 3926# total weight
Re: Super stock spring question [Re: 68LAR] #3210034
02/02/24 03:39 PM
02/02/24 03:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,509
Tulsa, Oklahoma
340Cuda Offline
master
340Cuda  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,509
Tulsa, Oklahoma
I guess I will add my $0.02 worth of experience.

We have run a 1969 small block Barracuda since the late 70's. From the start we ran the A body SS springs. (002-003).

They worked well but would become inconsistent until we replaced them.

We probably went through at least three sets of the springs until we converted to the Caltracs bars and springs.

The car became more consistent and we had to adjust for wheelstands.

My advice would be to to directly to Calvert setup and not use the Mopar springs.

Re: Super stock spring question [Re: 340Cuda] #3210070
02/02/24 04:52 PM
02/02/24 04:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,710
Portage,michigan
B
B3422W5 Offline
I Live Here
B3422W5  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,710
Portage,michigan
My old W5 Duster( many know it on here) ran well in the 9’s on 002/003 springs at 3350 pounds.
Nothing but CE 3 ways all around, no snubber, would hook anywhere, dial it blindfolded, super consistent wheelstanding crowd pleaser.
This on 28 by 10 DOT tires.
Frankly, at that power level, I heard more guys constantly fiddling with Cal Tracks than I ever heard with 002/003 leafs getting them to work.
A car either works or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, you have to change something, but if it does work, “ upgrading” isn’t going to make it work better.

Last edited by B3422W5; 02/02/24 04:52 PM.

69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight
418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam
Best so far, 10.40 @127 1/4
1.41 best 60 foot
6.60 at 103.90 1/8

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1