Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
413 block sonic test #3200656
12/29/23 12:36 PM
12/29/23 12:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
Wondering if anyone has checked the wall thickness on a 72 413 industrial block or maybe it’s a motor home block? Any difference between the two? Has a front sump pan and small diameter but way thicker HB (like a Hemi balancer), dished pistons.
Thanks.

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3200736
12/29/23 05:15 PM
12/29/23 05:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
I have one(1972 also) I built for my 1963 Fury, I'm going to tell the local streeters it is and old 413 industrial truck motor that runs pretty good devil 4.150 stroke, 7.100 long BB chevy type I beam rods, 440 Spurce heads and RPM inatke with a 850 CFM Pro System double pumper, I had it bore to 4.250 after sonic testing it, I wanted some cylinder wall left for future use if needed luck I think I could have had it bore to 4,320 safely but maybe not, that was a long time ago and I haven't went out to the shop to see if I still have that sonic sheet or not confused


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3200822
12/30/23 12:57 AM
12/30/23 12:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,022
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,022
Oregon
413 blocks are not usually very thick although I have heard of some 413 blocks that were made from 426 cores. Not sure that is true or not. The typical 413 engine was just like any other Mopar engine cast in the day, that is, they usually suck. The Mopar casting plants had poor quality control so there is usually a fair amount of cores shift. One side of the cylinders will be great, the other side thin. Almost every Mopar block I've ever tested has core shift.

Mopar blocks aren't as bad as Ford blocks, but they aren't great. Best factory blocks are Chevy big blocks. I've never seen a standard bore Chevy big block that was too thin for performance use. Most Ford blocks are too thin for performance use while roughly 50% of all Mopar blocks are too thin.

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: AndyF] #3200831
12/30/23 01:39 AM
12/30/23 01:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
S
Scully Offline
enthusiast
Scully  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
Originally Posted by AndyF
413 blocks are not usually very thick although I have heard of some 413 blocks that were made from 426 cores. Not sure that is true or not. The typical 413 engine was just like any other Mopar engine cast in the day, that is, they usually suck. The Mopar casting plants had poor quality control so there is usually a fair amount of cores shift. One side of the cylinders will be great, the other side thin. Almost every Mopar block I've ever tested has core shift.

Mopar blocks aren't as bad as Ford blocks, but they aren't great. Best factory blocks are Chevy big blocks. I've never seen a standard bore Chevy big block that was too thin for performance use. Most Ford blocks are too thin for performance use while roughly 50% of all Mopar blocks are too thin.
Many early industrial 413 blocks are over .300" thick before boring which is why they are typically used for NHRA stock 426s. Some mid 60s 383 blocks I have and my 58 350 are well into the high .200"s and low .300"s. I don't think the 70s 413s are quite as consistently thick. The standard 413s are quite thin with the exception of the 1964 2205897 block which was also used for the 426 street wedge as well as a few Max Wedges.

Last edited by Scully; 12/30/23 01:42 AM.
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3200840
12/30/23 03:29 AM
12/30/23 03:29 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,021
NY
B
B1duster Offline
master
B1duster  Offline
master
B

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,021
NY
I have a 72, 71 cast date, industrial 413 block I got from a local guy. It’s 4.23 bore with JE pistons. It’s supposed to be very thick and could go to 4.32. I just got a new Molnar 3.75 -2.2 crank and 6.76 2.2 Molnar rods, stealth heads, A&A max wedge intake and repro max ex manifolds. Only 421 cubes

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: AndyF] #3200866
12/30/23 10:12 AM
12/30/23 10:12 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,977
Apollo, PA.
B1MAXX Offline
top fuel
B1MAXX  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,977
Apollo, PA.
Originally Posted by AndyF
413 blocks are not usually very thick although I have heard of some 413 blocks that were made from 426 cores. Not sure that is true or not. The typical 413 engine was just like any other Mopar engine cast in the day, that is, they usually suck. The Mopar casting plants had poor quality control so there is usually a fair amount of cores shift. One side of the cylinders will be great, the other side thin. Almost every Mopar block I've ever tested has core shift.

Mopar blocks aren't as bad as Ford blocks, but they aren't great. Best factory blocks are Chevy big blocks. I've never seen a standard bore Chevy big block that was too thin for performance use. Most Ford blocks are too thin for performance use while roughly 50% of all Mopar blocks are too thin.



What? realcrazy

Not buying this either. 460/429's are very good blocks in my opinion.

The only two engines I have seen with split bores was a BBC, and a BBM

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: B1MAXX] #3200892
12/30/23 12:22 PM
12/30/23 12:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
Just got this from Al Corda hope it comes out ok. 413 block

Resized_20220121_115509_Burst01003.jpeg
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3200991
12/30/23 07:04 PM
12/30/23 07:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Which block is it, industrial or passenger car?
They are definitely different thickness castings scope work


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: Cab_Burge] #3201008
12/30/23 09:34 PM
12/30/23 09:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
Not sure but I’m thinking industrial, right thick on most cylinders at top .250 to .300+. Even at .120 over (426 + .060) still a lot of wall left

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3201043
12/31/23 12:48 AM
12/31/23 12:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
S
Scully Offline
enthusiast
Scully  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
Not sure but I’m thinking industrial, right thick on most cylinders at top .250 to .300+. Even at .120 over (426 + .060) still a lot of wall left
The last regular 413 blocks were made in 1965, Al used the industrial 413s at some point in his 426 Stockers unless he had some unbored 440s or 426 marine blocks.

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: Scully] #3201063
12/31/23 07:43 AM
12/31/23 07:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,807
ohio
R
ruderunner Offline
master
ruderunner  Offline
master
R

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,807
ohio
I can see the 413 truck engines being thicker 66 and up. There's a good chance that they were cast using 440 molds.


Angry white pureblood male
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: ruderunner] #3201180
12/31/23 03:46 PM
12/31/23 03:46 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted by ruderunner
I can see the 413 truck engines being thicker 66 and up. There's a good chance that they were cast using 440 molds.
I'm almost positive those two molds are not the same due to the added reenforcing ribs added onto the outside of the industrial 413 blocks scope work


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: ruderunner] #3201184
12/31/23 04:07 PM
12/31/23 04:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
S
Scully Offline
enthusiast
Scully  Offline
enthusiast
S

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
Originally Posted by ruderunner
I can see the 413 truck engines being thicker 66 and up. There's a good chance that they were cast using 440 molds.

The thickest 413 I have came out of a 1963 Dodge tractor C 1000, it's in my race car now.

Last edited by Scully; 12/31/23 04:07 PM.
Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: Scully] #3201304
01/01/24 12:19 AM
01/01/24 12:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline OP
master
cudaman1969  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
Out of curiosity I went to check casting numbers on the 413, NONE other than date. Never saw that before?

Re: 413 block sonic test [Re: cudaman1969] #3201587
01/02/24 11:10 AM
01/02/24 11:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
The '73 industrial 413 block I have isn't crazy thick. I can't recall the thickness from memory, but I wouldn't go past .060" or .070" over. I checked it after hearing about how they were really thick and would easily go to 4.320". Not true w/ the one I have.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1