Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: larrymopar360]
#3139379
04/19/23 08:56 PM
04/19/23 08:56 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817 Star Idaho
67vertman
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817
Star Idaho
|
It is hard to find a standard cab R/T and that has low miles.
I would like to find one. But, so far no luck.
My Monster are real!
Living within your means makes life pretty easy.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: 67vertman]
#3139391
04/19/23 09:38 PM
04/19/23 09:38 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,996 RI Deep in the rust belt
chargervert
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,996
RI Deep in the rust belt
|
I have a shaker hood kit for one of those!
70 Charger R/T SE 472 Hemi
70 Charger R/T convertible
70 Charger R/T V Code Sixpack
69 Charger R/T SE Sunroofcar
68 Charger 383
68 Charger 318
71 Charger R/T
70 Challenger convertible
71 Challenger convertible
71 Cuda 340
09 Challenger R/T Classic
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: 67vertman]
#3139502
04/20/23 12:51 PM
04/20/23 12:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,750 Eagle, Idaho
Neil
The Doctor is in.
|
The Doctor is in.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,750
Eagle, Idaho
|
It is hard to find a standard cab R/T and that has low miles.
I would like to find one. But, so far no luck. Very few were sold here to begin with since they are 2wd and everyone here wants a 4wd truck for the winter. Older Ford Lightnings are also rare around here for the same 2wd reason. If you find a Dakota R/T now chances are that it will be high miles with 50% of the clearcoat burned off and foam hanging out of the seats. Last time I saw a nice regular cab R/T that was well taken care of was on a used car lot like 6-7 years ago.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: 67vertman]
#3139967
04/22/23 12:15 PM
04/22/23 12:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938 Central Florida
larrymopar360
OP
Stud Muffin
|
OP
Stud Muffin
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938
Central Florida
|
It is hard to find a standard cab R/T and that has low miles.
I would like to find one. But, so far no luck. I just found you one
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: larrymopar360]
#3140003
04/22/23 03:10 PM
04/22/23 03:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817 Star Idaho
67vertman
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817
Star Idaho
|
It is hard to find a standard cab R/T and that has low miles.
I would like to find one. But, so far no luck. I just found you one That you did Larry. Now if you want to go get it and bring it to Idaho.....
My Monster are real!
Living within your means makes life pretty easy.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: 67vertman]
#3140006
04/22/23 03:34 PM
04/22/23 03:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938 Central Florida
larrymopar360
OP
Stud Muffin
|
OP
Stud Muffin
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938
Central Florida
|
It is hard to find a standard cab R/T and that has low miles.
I would like to find one. But, so far no luck. I just found you one That you did Larry. Now if you want to go get it and bring it to Idaho..... Yeah that whole distance thing doesn't help. And this truck brought good money too! $16,500 with an original sticker of $22,xxx.
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: larrymopar360]
#3140013
04/22/23 04:52 PM
04/22/23 04:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,894 A collage of whims
topside
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,894
A collage of whims
|
$16,500 vs $22,000 really isn't as close as it sounds on the surface: different dollars (inflation). Or, put it inversely, $16,500 now is like about $10,000 or so back then. Now my head hurts That truck would probably be $40,000 or so new nowadays...if anyone even made a mid-size truck as cool as a standard-cab Dak R/T.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: topside]
#3140019
04/22/23 05:15 PM
04/22/23 05:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938 Central Florida
larrymopar360
OP
Stud Muffin
|
OP
Stud Muffin
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15,938
Central Florida
|
$16,500 vs $22,000 really isn't as close as it sounds on the surface: different dollars (inflation). Or, put it inversely, $16,500 now is like about $10,000 or so back then. Now my head hurts That truck would probably be $40,000 or so new nowadays...if anyone even made a mid-size truck as cool as a standard-cab Dak R/T. Actually kind of my point was how high the prices have climbed on new cars and trucks. I was floored when I saw $22k on the sticker! Can you imagine finding a new V8 truck now for even close to that?! But I still think $16,500 was pretty good money for this truck, or at least I didn't expect it to go that high. I was thinking 10 grand ish.
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
|
Re: 2000 Dakota R/T std cab swb on BaT
[Re: larrymopar360]
#3140023
04/22/23 05:37 PM
04/22/23 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817 Star Idaho
67vertman
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,817
Star Idaho
|
I too thought $16,500 was strong money. Last year I found a extended cab one, just as clean and they where asking $9500.
My Monster are real!
Living within your means makes life pretty easy.
|
|
|
|
|