Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: challengersteve]
#2169384
10/07/16 12:36 AM
10/07/16 12:36 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,378
KY USA
mopargem
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,378
KY USA
|
I got the Goodmark when they first came out several years ago and the right fender lower body line between the door and wheel opening was noticeably cocked at an angle as in crooked. Seems like drivers side was fine. Other than that they fit ok with dome flight dollying to the front edge for the headlight bezels to flush up. In other words not very GOODmark
68 Polara 500...LL1 Y7 M6X
69 Hemi road runner...X9 X9 M6X
69 A12 road runner....R4 R4 M6X
69 ModTop FLORAL Super Bee...F
70 AAR 'cuda...EW1 EW1 H4X9
71 Duster 340...FJ6 V24 L6X9
71 road runner FC7 V1X M6X9
72 Rallye Charger B5 V1W
74 'cuda 360...KB5 V1X A6X9
08 SRT Challenger #234
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: challengersteve]
#2169450
10/07/16 03:26 AM
10/07/16 03:26 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765
Vancouver, WA
Cuda Cody
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765
Vancouver, WA
|
There's a good chance neither will fit perfect out of the box. Even NOS fenders might need a little work. And aftermarket will almost for sure need a little massaging to get perfect gaps. The last 1970 AMD Challenger fender I fitted last year was so bad I just fixed the original fender and put the new AMD on a shelf. IMO, there's no bolt on perfect fender available on the market. And besides the fitment with AMD and Goodmark, they will all need holes fixed to make them look somewhat like 1970 challenger fenders. Sometimes I wonder if the guys working at the repop factory are blind?
1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed
1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed
1970 Challenger T/A Auto
1970 Challenger R/T Auto
1970 Challenger Auto
1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed
1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed
1970 Hemi Challenger 4-Speed
1970 Hemi Cuda 4-Speed
1971 Cuda Auto
1971 Cuda 4-Speed
LOOKING to BUY 1970 & 1971 E Body J, V and R Code project cars
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: challengersteve]
#2169663
10/07/16 03:17 PM
10/07/16 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,664
South Dakota
hotairballoonpilot
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,664
South Dakota
|
I did a 70 for a guy that got the goodmark fender for it when he bought the car. It did take some extra work but no way what I had seen when they 1st came out. Sorry can't tell you from experience on the AMD fenders.
Contact Me about AMD Prices
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: Cuda Cody]
#2169882
10/07/16 09:24 PM
10/07/16 09:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
Morty426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
|
There's a good chance neither will fit perfect out of the box. Even NOS fenders might need a little work. And aftermarket will almost for sure need a little massaging to get perfect gaps. The last 1970 AMD Challenger fender I fitted last year was so bad I just fixed the original fender and put the new AMD on a shelf. IMO, there's no bolt on perfect fender available on the market. And besides the fitment with AMD and Goodmark, they will all need holes fixed to make them look somewhat like 1970 challenger fenders. Sometimes I wonder if the guys working at the repop factory are blind? I have not come across an AMD or Goodmark piece that I could use yet. The Goodmark pieces I have purchased are still on a shelf and I will not be using them but they aren't fenders.
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: challengersteve]
#2174866
10/14/16 10:26 PM
10/14/16 10:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632
jersey shore
flypaper
I hate Texas
|
I hate Texas
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632
jersey shore
|
believe it or not,i have found some goodmark parts that are better then AMD junk i think its a roll of the dice with either with wheelhouses AMD wheelhouses are for sure not any better then goodmark! amd junk wheelhouses have been reworked more then 4 times that i know of (yes 4 or 5 different versions are out there (i've seen 3 myself)and they still can't get it right. if you want something the fits and resembles the original there is only one source..  
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: flypaper]
#3091163
11/02/22 01:38 PM
11/02/22 01:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 482
Marysville Wa
moparfan
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 482
Marysville Wa
|
Bringing this back up. Is there something on the market now that is better, I purchased an AMD and it isn't close to fitting in many ways and the stamping on the on the inner fender part towards the front is totally wrong. so, when it's on the car and painted with the hood open its wrong. The original fender i have the body guy wants me to try and find something better to start with.
2017 Challenger R/T Scat Pack Shaker
2021 T/A 392
1970 Challenger R/T 383,727, 3.55, (Wife's car)
1970 Challenger R/T SE 440-4, 4-speed, 4.10 Dana
1972 Dodge Demon 396 W-2,904, 4.30, 10.660 @ 125.85
2020 Hellcat redeye
|
|
|
Re: 70 Challenger fenders Goodmark or AMD
[Re: RROD]
#3092342
11/07/22 03:32 PM
11/07/22 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 482
Marysville Wa
moparfan
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 482
Marysville Wa
|
It's the passenger fender I'm dealing with. the marker light is 70/71, the fender where it bolts on by the core support is different than the oe and the fit is way off,
2017 Challenger R/T Scat Pack Shaker
2021 T/A 392
1970 Challenger R/T 383,727, 3.55, (Wife's car)
1970 Challenger R/T SE 440-4, 4-speed, 4.10 Dana
1972 Dodge Demon 396 W-2,904, 4.30, 10.660 @ 125.85
2020 Hellcat redeye
|
|
|
|
|
