Stock 340 six pack dyno test
#2757551
03/30/20 11:25 AM
03/30/20 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,719 Home
SRT6776
OP
I hate internal combustion engines!
|
OP
I hate internal combustion engines!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,719
Home
|
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: SRT6776]
#2757565
03/30/20 12:13 PM
03/30/20 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,344 Banana Republic
FM3AAR
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,344
Banana Republic
|
I just watched this vid last week. Pretty close to what NHRA factored them at.
“You’ll own nothing” — And “you’ll be happy about it.” K. Schwab
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: SRT6776]
#2757601
03/30/20 02:01 PM
03/30/20 02:01 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,163 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,163
Bend,OR USA
|
I don't know how much true compression ratio they made that motor have, stock from the factory OEM,not blue printed, they would have had around 9.5 to 1 or lower. If you use the NHRA factory blue print specs provided by Ma Mopar to NHRA they will have around 11.3 to 11.6 to compression ratio I use to race in NHRA Stock in division 7 in SO CA, I built two 1971 340 motors for Steve and Linda Meyers, one motor had the early X heads(894) and the other one had the mid 1970 J or U "916"heads, CRS now. Both motors had the same carb and intake, we tested several different ones of both and kept and used the best ones for both race motors, same grind camshaft degree in the same on both motor, I had moved it from 2 degrees retarded to 6 degrees advance. We had tested two other camshafts and tested them the same way, from 2 degrees retarded to 6 degrees advanced. The X headed motor made peak HP of 430 at 5900 RPM and the other motor with the J or U headed motor made 420 HP with the pistons hitting the eye brow around the valve seats on the heads, which is one of the problems when using those heads. On this six pack motor with lower compression it should make at least 340 to 360 HP at 5500 RPM tune correctly on todays pump gas BTW, I shut it, his video, off after the first pull before he started tuning it, as far as the bog when opening the outer carbs that is not hard to fix, raised the float levels to cure it
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: stumpy]
#2757800
03/30/20 09:50 PM
03/30/20 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,252 New York
rarefish
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,252
New York
|
Yeah, The motor leans out when the outboards start to open as there is a monetary lag before the fuel starts to flow out of the boosters. He needs to slow down the secondary opening a little with heavier springs in the pods.
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: rarefish]
#2757817
03/30/20 10:57 PM
03/30/20 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
|
He could cut 10 to 20 minutes off his videos by not repeating himself so many times. Man this guy is hard to listen to. Have to wonder what the owner is thinking giving a 30 over, numbers matching engine to this Wanna-be Youtube star for dyno beating? 356 hp 340 6 Pack
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: Grizzly]
#2757846
03/31/20 12:48 AM
03/31/20 12:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,122 Auburn WA
Dave_J
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,122
Auburn WA
|
By watching the boosters it seems the air flow could be helped with two Stub Stacks like these: https://pitstopusa.com/c-132427-air...nents-carburetor-airlflow-directors.html
Retired, US ARMY 1973-1994 ASE mechanic, Electrical 1994-1997 Retired GTE/VERIZON/FRONTIER 1997-2015
Posting cheap tech help (CRAP) here since Nov 97, 1000's of posts, some may be good.
03 Suzuki Burgman 650(Burger King) Scooter 65 Formula S Cuda 78 Little Red Express Truck 98 Buick Regal (wifes car)
|
|
|
Re: Stock 340 six pack dyno test
[Re: SRT6776]
#2758173
03/31/20 09:33 PM
03/31/20 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
|
Your little article made the same power as he did
"On factory claims of 275 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 340 lb-ft (3,200 rpm), we got 320 horsepower. Then we replaced the manifolds with a set of headers and got 352.1 horsepower"
They didn't push it for obvious reasons. Didn't read the whole thing did you? "Going back to the factory stock cast-iron exhaust manifolds, a Six Pack replaced the four barrel and we got 356 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 382 lb-ft at 4,000 rpm"
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
|
|