Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play #2472765
03/27/18 02:26 PM
03/27/18 02:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Hey guys, I was about to check/adjust hot lash on my 340 when I ran into what might be a potential problem, although I'm really not sure as I don't have much experience with shaft mounted aftermarket rocker setups.

It's a w2 econo head with Mopar Performance shaft mounted rockers, my machinist put the engine together.

When I went to adjust the first rocker, I cinched it down and realized it no longer moved freely on its own. I realized that when I loosened it and tightened it again, I must have change the end play. I ended up having to pry carefully with a screwdriver before tightening it to keep it off the shaft hold down so that it would move freely.

When I got to the the cylinder number 5 rockers I found that both rockers would slide left to right freely a pretty good amount (didn't measure it but I would say probably 3/16 inch of play). It was actually difficult to adjust lash because the lash seemed to change depending on how far left or right I slid the rockers.

I'm a little lost here. Is there supposed to be a specific tolerance between rocker arms or is the fact that some go side to side and others need prying while tightening to move freely OK?

I've never used a setup like this so i'm a little confused by how it's supposed to work.
Pictures of the rocker setup attached.

IMG_0639.JPGIMG_0641.JPG
Last edited by 1mean340; 03/27/18 02:30 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472768
03/27/18 02:34 PM
03/27/18 02:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines Offline
master
CompWedgeEngines  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
There is no place in that set up where you should have 1/4" of side free play.You want somewhere between .015-.020 clearance/end play between pairs. If you are moving the rockers so much that it changes the lash, thats a problem.Fix it before you run it. W2 pushrod angles are bad enough, without them being self adjusting.


RIP Monte Smith

Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.

WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472776
03/27/18 02:41 PM
03/27/18 02:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
You also need to make sure the rocker is centered over the valve, from front to rear. If that means milling the hold downs, it's what you have to do.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: madscientist] #2472789
03/27/18 03:02 PM
03/27/18 03:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Also make sure the push rods arent dragging on the
on the heads as the valves travel
wave

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472810
03/27/18 03:25 PM
03/27/18 03:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Eek, the motor was already run for about 500 miles (those pics were prior to first startup hence the clean ports). I trusted my engine builder with the assembly, only noticed this when I was about to adjust hotlash after the first oil change.

I will check on the front to back centering, I really hope that's right or this could turn into a real PITA 😡

Is less than .015 of clearance ok? It looks like some don't have shims, and the cylinder#1 pair I don't think even has that much. I assume I'll need at least that for expansion so they don't rub.

FWIW this is a low rpm engine, won't see over 6500 (supercharged). The heads/valvetrain I bought on here from a member a few years back, I didn't know much about setting these up so I just gave it to my engine builder to do along with the rest of the motor. Only noticed a tiny bit of metal on the drain plug during the first oil change , no sign of anything crazy but i'll definitely check the push rod clearance was figuring my builder already did all this for how much I paid 🙁

Last edited by 1mean340; 03/27/18 03:26 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472814
03/27/18 03:37 PM
03/27/18 03:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
This is the magnetic drain plug after the first oil change.

IMG_4207.JPG
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472837
03/27/18 04:20 PM
03/27/18 04:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,159
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,159
Bend,OR USA
All new motors make metal during break in, which is normal as parts wear in work shruggy
I run all the new the motor I build for 20 to 30 minutes to break in all the flat tappet cam motors I build and then drain the oil and cut the oil filter apart to see how much debris is in the pleats of the filter.
I do this several more times, at 500, 1000 and the 2000 miles after breaking them in to ensure that the oil filter cleans up all together after 1000 miles or third oil and filter change scope
On your deal if your checking the side play with the motor cold I would want .020 or more minimum per pair, .005 + side play when warmed up thumbs
Ain't hot rodding fun whistling grin


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472843
03/27/18 04:38 PM
03/27/18 04:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Thanks cab! Tell me about it haha, between FITECH issues, supercharger belt issues and now this, I got this car fired up late summer and it hasn't been able to make get even one clean WOT one gear pull after working on it every weekend.

It definitely didn't look like any more metal than I have normally seen on new motors so I wasn't too worried. Next oil change I'll cut the filter as well.

This setup has definitely been more than I bargained for trying to get everything to work right.

this just bothers me because I cut a pretty big check to my engine builder/machinist to assemble the engine and this seems like a pretty big thing to overlook. If it's just a matter of shimming, I don't mind, but if roller tips aren't centered front to back on the valve and the perches have to be milled I am going to have to go back to him and ask what's up. I normally expect a lot of bumps in the road and still have a ton of kinks to work out on my home built procharger setup and FITECH tuning issues so it really sucks having to take time out to fix stuff that I paid to have done.

but if I wanted easy, cheap and slow I would have gotten into marathon running so I'm not complaining, just venting a little LOL!

Last edited by 1mean340; 03/27/18 04:38 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472865
03/27/18 05:36 PM
03/27/18 05:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
Talk to Mike @ B3racing about the geometry


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: CSK] #2472867
03/27/18 05:39 PM
03/27/18 05:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By csk
Talk to Mike @ B3racing about the geometry


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You just know the geometry is put correct. It never is.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472869
03/27/18 05:42 PM
03/27/18 05:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
Another day, another waste of my time.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472937
03/27/18 07:21 PM
03/27/18 07:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
How thick are the shims at the bottom of the
springs.. they look real thick.. what is the
installed height
Also show your rockers at base and full lift
wave

Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 03/27/18 07:24 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472943
03/27/18 07:35 PM
03/27/18 07:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
OK, well I may have over-reacted a little on the clearances. The gap between the cylinder 5 rockers that I thought was 1/4" was actually about 36 thousands when I checked it with the feeler gauge. it felt like a lot more...yes this is embarassing LOL

as far as the roller tips being centered forward to back, they appear to be good but I am going to try to snap some pics of them because it is hard to see with the motor in the car. I can't get my head low enough to really get a good view.

My builder said the geometry was funky but he didn't think it would be an issue on a low rpm engine. The last engine the ran on looked about the same and he was taking it up to 7500 IIRC. Not saying it's good, but maybe good enough? I really don't know. I'm just going by what I'm being told.


Poly, makes sense that the lash was changing as i slid the rocker side to side, as you said, it would be changing the pushrod angle as you moved it. I take it the large 36 thousanths clearance is causing that as the others barely move


What I am also worried about is can they be too tight side to side? Most of these rockers seem extremely tight side to side. I mean you can move them freely up and down when they are off the valve but some of them I can't feel any side to side movement. I need to find the rest of my feeler gauges to check but I'm pretty sure most of them are less than .015 of clearance. I could be wrong though, as I just called 39 thousandths a 1/4 inch LOL

Mr P body, i will snap some pics of that.

Last edited by 1mean340; 03/27/18 07:36 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2472945
03/27/18 07:38 PM
03/27/18 07:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
And when I say this thing won't see over 6500rpm's I mean that. I plan to shift at around 6000 and set the rev limited pretty soon after it. It's a 295cfm flowing head, indy single plane, D1SC procharger with intercooler on E85 on a not so crazy bottom end (factory forged crank, H beam rods, stud girdle...that's it) so I figure it may be able to take boost, but not RPM's. It'll make more power than I need at 6000 with 8PSI so I don't plan on really revving it much higher.

Last edited by 1mean340; 03/27/18 07:38 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2473570
03/28/18 10:21 PM
03/28/18 10:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
RPM has ZERO to do with rocker arm geometry. Before you do anything further, get ahold of Mike at B3 racing engines (b3racingengines.com) and let him help you fix the geometry BEFORE you bother to do anything else.

Bad geometry is bad geometry. RPM means nothing.

I have typed this out so many times in so many places it feels beyond redundant. I can tell you that a great number of engine builders have no idea about rocker arm geometry, let alone rocker arm geometry with a shaft system. I am certainly not an expert, but I learned a long time ago the hard way that you must fix it. It's crazy to say my RPM's are low so I can let it slide.

In 38 years of doing this I have seen more destruction and broken parts from rocker geometry and general valve train issues than almost anything else.

I can tell you that when you fix your geometry, you will have to buy longer pushrods.

Don't put it off. Fix it now.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2473592
03/28/18 10:46 PM
03/28/18 10:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,395
Pa
Is your builder responsible for that mixed and matched bastardized pushrod set?

And remember, its a w2, so the intake rocker pushes to one side as it gets on the lobe. When setting lash, you have to sorta hold/push it over while you set lash.

Also, Make sure your rocker shims are on the side of the intake rocker that gets the load from the pushrod angle. Or said another way- on both sides of the exhaust rocker its paired with. IMO a shim isnt necessary on the one side of the intake rocker that is opposite the offset adjuster.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2473610
03/28/18 11:14 PM
03/28/18 11:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
The Great State of PA
tabletop390 Offline
member
tabletop390  Offline
member

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 61
The Great State of PA
Yes, get a hold of Mike. I had the same deal with my W2 econos. Mine were so off that the rocker arm was hitting the retainer and the roller was just about off the valve tip. I had the correct rocker shafts and the 1.5 ratio blue MP rocker arms. The shim kit helped dramatically. My W2's are late 70's vintage and I'm pretty sure the MP and Crane stuff, even though everything says that they'll fit, is actually meant for the race heads, especially the long valve versions.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2473617
03/28/18 11:27 PM
03/28/18 11:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 361
nj pine beach
D
dart9ss Offline
enthusiast
dart9ss  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 361
nj pine beach
B3 Mike is the man for the job.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481646
04/12/18 02:26 PM
04/12/18 02:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Hey guys, just getting around to reading some more of these replies in depth now, it was a busy week and I only had time to skim posts on here before.

I ended up getting some spacers and spent a few hours getting all the rockers perfectly centered side to side on over the valve and now they all have about 8-10 thousandths of clearance side to side. Setting the lash went very smoothly after all the movement was gone.

I spoke to my builder about the geometry and he keeps telling me he thinks it would be fine. This whole top end was run already by David Dean here on the forums on a 340 block decked .030 making just short of 600hp. that's who I bought it from, pushrods and all. I gave the whole top end I purchased to my machinist/builder and told him that if anything else was needed to get it to work, I'd be willing to pay for it. He checked the valve springs, measured pushrods and told me everything seemed good to reuse as is.

I just emailed Mike at B3 with pictures of the setup just to get his opinion on it.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481650
04/12/18 02:32 PM
04/12/18 02:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Mr. P Body, here are a few pics I took, let me know if you need a different angle. that's full lift on the intake rocker
IMG_4498 by Kris A, on Flickr
IMG_4491 by Kris A, on FlickrIMG_4490 by Kris A, on Flickr

Last edited by 1mean340; 04/12/18 02:34 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481651
04/12/18 02:37 PM
04/12/18 02:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Your engine builder is WRONG and the geometry isn't correct. Is it good enough? Maybe. Is it correct? Nope.


Why push it? You've spent all the time and money. Fix the geometry. If the engine builder thinks half assed geometry is good enough, I'd be finding a new engine builder.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481652
04/12/18 02:37 PM
04/12/18 02:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
If you click on them, you can zoom in from the Flikr page.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481655
04/12/18 02:41 PM
04/12/18 02:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
K
krautrock Offline
top fuel
krautrock  Offline
top fuel
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
do we need to see the wipe pattern to determine if the geometry is correct?

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: madscientist] #2481660
04/12/18 02:46 PM
04/12/18 02:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Originally Posted By madscientist
Your engine builder is WRONG and the geometry isn't correct. Is it good enough? Maybe. Is it correct? Nope.


Why push it? You've spent all the time and money. Fix the geometry. If the engine builder thinks half assed geometry is good enough, I'd be finding a new engine builder.


He definitely didn't say it was correct, but didn't seem worried about it having problems for my setup knowing that I was trying to make this all work on a tight budget. Not arguing with you, just specifying what he said. I spent way more on this engine than I ever planned to, not that I expect a good build to be cheap...but this was a terrible foundation in the first place to do what I wanted to do with it. I was mainly just throwing it together to have fun with using parts I had lying around or bought second hand for cheap and I was just planning on running it until I can get my other LSX powered project car finished. After that, I was hoping to do a gen 3 hemi in this car or a 5.3 LM7 I've been using for mockup in my LSX car. Most of my friends are making more power with their junkyard 5.3's than I'd ever be confident pushing through this LA block.

I'm listening though, and taking everything I am hearing into consideration. What would be involved with fixing the geometry? Not really sure how I'd go about doing that, as of now there is no interference with any parts, but it looks like if those pushrods straightened out even a little bit more then the heads would have to be clearanced. That's just not going to happen. I'd most likely try to sell the LA stuff off and start over with a late model, it would save me a lot of headaches in other ways as well as I'm still dealing with major FITECH tuning issues on E85 and blower belt alignment/tension issues on the procharger bracket I built. If there is something I can do that would be fairly easy/cheap, then I'll do it.

Last edited by 1mean340; 04/12/18 02:56 PM.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481670
04/12/18 03:05 PM
04/12/18 03:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,551
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,551
Fulton County, PA
The angle of the intake pushrod is going to load the intake rocker towards the exhaust rocker. On my W2s, I used Crane rockers with aluminum blocks from Arrow or someone. Shims were used to adjust play, center the roller on the valve and also as thrust washers. Initial set-up, without pushrods, starts at the center and works out, keeping in mind the intakes rockers are being pushed toward the exhausts. I kept my clearance snug. As long as no parts are replaced, this should only need to be done initially. Beyond that, just verify clearances and alignment, and adjust the blocks when installing to maintain that when putting it back together.

That's how I figured out how to do it. Ran them for years to 7200+, with the oil restricted to the heads, and never had an issue.


If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2481711
04/12/18 04:25 PM
04/12/18 04:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By 1mean340
Originally Posted By madscientist
Your engine builder is WRONG and the geometry isn't correct. Is it good enough? Maybe. Is it correct? Nope.


Why push it? You've spent all the time and money. Fix the geometry. If the engine builder thinks half assed geometry is good enough, I'd be finding a new engine builder.


He definitely didn't say it was correct, but didn't seem worried about it having problems for my setup knowing that I was trying to make this all work on a tight budget. Not arguing with you, just specifying what he said. I spent way more on this engine than I ever planned to, not that I expect a good build to be cheap...but this was a terrible foundation in the first place to do what I wanted to do with it. I was mainly just throwing it together to have fun with using parts I had lying around or bought second hand for cheap and I was just planning on running it until I can get my other LSX powered project car finished. After that, I was hoping to do a gen 3 hemi in this car or a 5.3 LM7 I've been using for mockup in my LSX car. Most of my friends are making more power with their junkyard 5.3's than I'd ever be confident pushing through this LA block.

I'm listening though, and taking everything I am hearing into consideration. What would be involved with fixing the geometry? Not really sure how I'd go about doing that, as of now there is no interference with any parts, but it looks like if those pushrods straightened out even a little bit more then the heads would have to be clearanced. That's just not going to happen. I'd most likely try to sell the LA stuff off and start over with a late model, it would save me a lot of headaches in other ways as well as I'm still dealing with major FITECH tuning issues on E85 and blower belt alignment/tension issues on the procharger bracket I built. If there is something I can do that would be fairly easy/cheap, then I'll do it.



I get the budget. I've also been doing this a long time, and it makes me sick when a guy says it's good enough when the fix is so simple. Before the B3 system the only alternative was to mill the stands and use offset stands and blocks. Most guys just lived with what they had because they didn't want to spend the money.


Mikes system is so simple even I can measure for it and use it. The worst part of the job is grinding out the bolt holes in the shaft so you can move it back. IIRC Mike will do it, but you have to pay. Most guys with a die grinder can do it rather easily.


You are too close not to fix it now. Why should the Chrysler guys deal with [censored] geometry? The GM won't do it. Why should we?

Most guys think centering the sweep is correct. It's not. You want the sweep as narrow as possible.


I remember when Indy came out with their heads and they had cupped stands. I remembering calling them and asking them how in the hell am I going to correct the geometry without a bunch of milling and fabrication? Their exact answer was, and I've never forgotten this, was; if you change the geometry on our heads you are too dumb to own them.


To this day, I have never bought a part from them. I've worked on their stuff, but I won't buy it.


Take your time. Learn as much about rocker geometry as you can. And then fix yours. It's really quite simple now. And worth the effort.

Last edited by madscientist; 04/12/18 04:29 PM.

Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: krautrock] #2481712
04/12/18 04:26 PM
04/12/18 04:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By krautrock
do we need to see the wipe pattern to determine if the geometry is correct?



I don't. Haven't seen one that was correct yet without fixing it.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2482170
04/13/18 02:20 PM
04/13/18 02:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
Mad, thanks for your input. I contacted Mike at B3 and he asked me to take several measurements which I will today and then send them back to him so he can let me know how badly the geometry is out.

I will most likely be fixing it pending what mike says about the geometry/kit I am probably going to fire it up today just to see if I can straighten out the FITECH tuning issues, I figure a few hours of run time hopefully won't hurt anything with that geometry (it already ran about 500 miles like that).

Didn't mean to seem resistant to changing it, truth is this car still has a ton to be sorted out with spitting blower belts at WOT and unable to go more than half throttle without falling flat because of the FITECH dumping fuel. If everything ran good, I'd be happy to fix it, but it sucks putting more time and money into the valvetrain when I don't know how much it's going to take to fix the other issues and make a clean pass.

Truth be told, I am strongly thinking about a Hellcat swap. I didn't originally because at the time of starting this the crate engine was still in the 20k price range and a stand alone harness wasn't offered, but now it's all out there. It's what I always wanted to do with the car, could support the power I was hoping to make and won't be a time bomb like a factory LA block making it. I might as well fix this though, as even if I sell it, I'd feel better if it were correct. Hellcat would involve me selling off the parts I have for my other project car but that car's a chevy so it seems totally worth it haha

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2482176
04/13/18 02:22 PM
04/13/18 02:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
1
1mean340 Offline OP
enthusiast
1mean340  Offline OP
enthusiast
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
Suffolk County, New York
CMcallister, thanks for the tip! that's pretty much what I did when I shimmed them before, and they are all within about 8-10 thousandths now, no more crazy side to side slop. Setting lash was way easier.

Re: shaft mounted aluminum rocker arms side play [Re: 1mean340] #2482192
04/13/18 02:59 PM
04/13/18 02:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By 1mean340
Mad, thanks for your input. I contacted Mike at B3 and he asked me to take several measurements which I will today and then send them back to him so he can let me know how badly the geometry is out.

I will most likely be fixing it pending what mike says about the geometry/kit I am probably going to fire it up today just to see if I can straighten out the FITECH tuning issues, I figure a few hours of run time hopefully won't hurt anything with that geometry (it already ran about 500 miles like that).

Didn't mean to seem resistant to changing it, truth is this car still has a ton to be sorted out with spitting blower belts at WOT and unable to go more than half throttle without falling flat because of the FITECH dumping fuel. If everything ran good, I'd be happy to fix it, but it sucks putting more time and money into the valvetrain when I don't know how much it's going to take to fix the other issues and make a clean pass.

Truth be told, I am strongly thinking about a Hellcat swap. I didn't originally because at the time of starting this the crate engine was still in the 20k price range and a stand alone harness wasn't offered, but now it's all out there. It's what I always wanted to do with the car, could support the power I was hoping to make and won't be a time bomb like a factory LA block making it. I might as well fix this though, as even if I sell it, I'd feel better if it were correct. Hellcat would involve me selling off the parts I have for my other project car but that car's a chevy so it seems totally worth it haha




Glad you are working on it. Would you mind posting how far off your geometry is, so that others may see what it is? It would maybe help someone to understand geometry better.

If you keep it long enough, I think you'll find the valve lash will not move nearly as much, springs and your valve job will last longer and believe it or not, the valve train will make a bit more noise. So don't worry if your valve train sounds a bit noisy.

Keep us posted please!!!!


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1