Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Fuseable link #1835988
05/28/15 02:20 PM
05/28/15 02:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 29
Ohio
J
JT01 Offline OP
member
JT01  Offline OP
member
J

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 29
Ohio
I need a new one for my 69 charger anybody know where I can get one I've tried year one and classic industries there both out of stock. Thanks for any help

Re: Fuseable link [Re: JT01] #1835989
05/28/15 02:22 PM
05/28/15 02:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,923
Grand Prairie,Texas
stumpy Offline
I Win
stumpy  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,923
Grand Prairie,Texas
Any local parts store will carry fusible links in premade lengths or by the foot.

Re: Fuseable link [Re: JT01] #1836050
05/28/15 03:46 PM
05/28/15 03:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 29
Ohio
J
JT01 Offline OP
member
JT01  Offline OP
member
J

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 29
Ohio
Ok thank you

Re: Fuseable link [Re: JT01] #1836067
05/28/15 04:22 PM
05/28/15 04:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
C
crlush Offline
pro stock
crlush  Offline
pro stock
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
Napa

Re: Fuseable link [Re: JT01] #1836201
05/28/15 08:46 PM
05/28/15 08:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 19
Maine
M
MaximRecoil Offline
member
MaximRecoil  Offline
member
M

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 19
Maine
The fusible link in my '69 Charger had been replaced by someone with a regular wire at some point, just twisted and taped in there. I bought a new 16 gauge fusible link at the local autoparts store for a few dollars, which has the fusible link label on it and a ring terminal, but is just bare on the other end. I didn't have a new Packard 56 terminal to crimp onto it, so I reused the original one. The problem was that it was still factory-crimped onto that short remaining section of the original fusible link. So I drilled the wire strands out of the crimped area with a 1/16" drill bit, inserted the new fusible link, and then recrimped it with an open barrel crimping tool, like so:




Re: Fuseable link [Re: MaximRecoil] #1836222
05/28/15 09:21 PM
05/28/15 09:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
My fusible link failed not as a result of overload, but poor connection and heating at the spade terminal. Showed up driving in a summer rain storm... just about every OE electrical device was running. I replaced with a link from the parts store... but made the joint with ring terminals crimped and soldered plus a short 3/16" screw + lock washer + lock nut. Then taped.

I know not original, and if you dig down in the wires and look at it not pretty but I do not have to worry about poor connection. A little 1/4" spade terminal is just pretty marginal for loads in that wire. (even with newer re-pop harness that I was running).

Re: Fuseable link [Re: JT01] #1836314
05/28/15 11:32 PM
05/28/15 11:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,195
Harrisburg, Pa.
screamindriver Offline
master
screamindriver  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,195
Harrisburg, Pa.
Evans wiring has them... LINK

Re: Fuseable link [Re: MaximRecoil] #1836339
05/29/15 12:10 AM
05/29/15 12:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Sinitro Offline
master
Sinitro  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,439
So Cal
Originally Posted By MaximRecoil
The fusible link in my '69 Charger had been replaced by someone with a regular wire at some point, just twisted and taped in there. I bought a new 16 gauge fusible link at the local autoparts store for a few dollars, which has the fusible link label on it and a ring terminal, but is just bare on the other end. I didn't have a new Packard 56 terminal to crimp onto it, so I reused the original one. The problem was that it was still factory-crimped onto that short remaining section of the original fusible link. So I drilled the wire strands out of the crimped area with a 1/16" drill bit, inserted the new fusible link, and then recrimped it with an open barrel crimping tool, like so:





I would recommend that U solder that terminal as well, assures a better contact..

Just my $0.02... wink

Re: Fuseable link [Re: Sinitro] #1836400
05/29/15 01:27 AM
05/29/15 01:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 19
Maine
M
MaximRecoil Offline
member
MaximRecoil  Offline
member
M

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 19
Maine
Originally Posted By Sinitro
I would recommend that U solder that terminal as well, assures a better contact..


Chrysler didn't use solder on the fusible link terminals, nor on any other crimp in the entire wiring harness, and neither did/does any other car manufacturer that I know of.

Solder is very useful for plumbing and printed circuit boards (I used to work in a PCB factory, through-hole soldering terminal blocks into about 1,000 PCBs a night, for 2 years, and I still do a lot of soldering at home when fixing old PCBs), but it isn't so great for car wiring. It will do in a pinch, but a proper crimp is superior.

A proper crimp is airtight, so the wire within the crimp can not corrode, and it is also still flexible. Corrosion isn't really an issue with a soldered joint either, but it is comparatively brittle, which is a bad thing in a high-motion, high-vibration environment which is subjected to many cycles of hot and cold. Cars use multi-strand wiring because of this (rather than solid core like in houses, where there is no motion), and using solder defeats the purpose of that (solder will crack a lot easier than even solid core wire). Every solder joint you add is a weak (brittle) link in the harness. You can see this for yourself by simply tinning a section of wire and then flexing it several times. It won't take long to crack.

A lot of repairs I do to old PCBs consist of re-soldering old cracked solder joints, especially on the chassis of old CRT monitors (i.e., from 1980s video arcade machines), and those aren't even usually subjected to significant motion/vibration. The cracking is mainly due to many hot and cold cycles over a long period of time.

Last edited by MaximRecoil; 05/29/15 01:32 AM.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1