Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: VernMotor]
#1609557
04/19/14 07:56 PM
04/19/14 07:56 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
I don't know yet mike. it is not all together. do you think it would live with that much compression ?
Its all dependent on your cam.. when the intake closes but I'm at 14.1:1 and not problem at all
|
|
|
Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: VernMotor]
#1609561
04/19/14 09:15 PM
04/19/14 09:15 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
was shifting the car at 6000 and thought the traps at 6200
I will assume this engine is gonna make more power than the last one.. if so you will most likely go a bit higher in the revs.... so what kind of duration are you thinking
|
|
|
Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: VernMotor]
#1609562
04/19/14 09:21 PM
04/19/14 09:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,998 GO BUCKS !!!!!!!
340RICK
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,998
GO BUCKS !!!!!!!
|
Quote:
was shifting the car at 6000 and thought the traps at 6200
Jamie
I am guessing you will be shifting at 6800 and running low 10's now
|
|
|
Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1609563
04/19/14 09:26 PM
04/19/14 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300 Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
|
Quote:
Quote:
was shifting the car at 6000 and thought the traps at 6200
I will assume this engine is gonna make more power than the last one.. if so you will most likely go a bit higher in the revs.... so what kind of duration are you thinking
277 @ .050 would work, hint, hint. Keith
|
|
|
Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: VernMotor]
#1609568
04/19/14 10:56 PM
04/19/14 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Ok lol I do not ! will not run it that hard. 10.90 is just fine .in fact I thought I would shift this lower..be easy on it .live awhile
You wouldnt be running it much harder than your old engine... a few revs wont hurt that(not unless its got stock rods)... but if you have aftermarket decent rods then I wouldnt worry at all even if you went to 6800.... hell Jamie... you sound like you want to idle to the finish line... LOL
|
|
|
Re: Ok is this going to be a problem child ?
[Re: VernMotor]
#1609571
04/19/14 11:41 PM
04/19/14 11:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,195 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,195
Bend,OR USA
|
You have two choices, use it or not use it I would make sure it was alittle on the rich side with the E85 and not to much timing and go bracket racing Who did or who is going to do your E85 Carb? I had AJ Castilini(SP?) do mine, it is real sensitive on the dyno to jetting, one jet size either way would make it lose power BTW, E85 and bracket racing are made foe each other, hardly any change in ET from early morning to late afternoon Don't tell anyone else that though AKA I would worry about te main webbing on any stock 440 block if you decide to RPM it much above 7000 RPM on the edge on the tune up Run it slightly fat and don't push the total timing and you should be okay
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
|
|