|
Re: 325-50-15 's under stock Challenger
[Re: speedfreek]
#1552822
12/24/13 11:50 PM
12/24/13 11:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852 KENTUCKY
69CHARGERMD
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,852
KENTUCKY
|
Thanks. Going for the same look, b body Dana, big tire etc, was going to use espo 1" over stock ride height Kinda confused on what tire size after seeing yours ( which looks awesome) 295/65 vs 325/50 ??? Great looking car
|
|
|
Re: 325-50-15 's under stock Challenger
[Re: mopardamo]
#1552831
12/30/13 03:46 PM
12/30/13 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,576 Motor City
6PKRTSE
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,576
Motor City
|
Looks awesome. I just prefer the extra dia on the sidewall of the 315/60's on my Challenger This is also on a 12" wide wheels . Required a mini tub & moving springs to the frame rail though.
1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute 1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack 1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi 1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL 1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383 1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440 1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4 2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4 2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
|
|
|
Re: 325-50-15 's under stock Challenger
[Re: mopar65]
#1552833
12/30/13 06:07 PM
12/30/13 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295 U.S.
moparniac
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
|
I had 315/60/15s in mine.
Mopar Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|