Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Rocker Geometry Measurements #1524296
10/27/13 08:39 PM
10/27/13 08:39 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Here are the measurement and spec instructions, required for calculating correct geometry, that so many of you have requested.

1. Distance between the top of the rocker shaft and the top of the valve stem. Measure the distance between the combination square and the tip of the valve stem using a caliper, feeler gages, or other accurate measuring device. Be sure the square is resting on top of the rocker shaft and the blade is on the same angle as the valve stem. (See Photo)

2. Diameter of the rocker shaft and the roller tip of the rocker arm.

3. Rocker ratio being used.

4. Valve lift from cam card w/ 1.5 ratio rocker, or just lobe lift.

With these measurements and specs, you can contact me and I can let you know if correction is necessary, and supply you with the appropriate kit to make it perfect, guaranteed.

As always, I am happy to answer questions. I like questions.


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524297
10/27/13 09:22 PM
10/27/13 09:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
P
Performance Only Offline
top fuel
Performance Only  Offline
top fuel
P

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
In your picture, the bottom of the spring is not centered. doesn't that skew the math?

Last edited by Performance Only; 10/27/13 09:24 PM.

machine shop owner and engine builder
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Performance Only] #1524298
10/27/13 10:05 PM
10/27/13 10:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline
I Win
Quicktree  Offline
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
BR can you tell us who you are and a little back ground? are you here to sell something? just curious

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524299
10/27/13 10:18 PM
10/27/13 10:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
onig Offline
enthusiast
onig  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
Thanks Mike.

Onig


69 Dart
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Quicktree] #1524300
10/27/13 10:26 PM
10/27/13 10:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Mopar-Al Offline
master
Mopar-Al  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
So the tee square doesnt have to be in the bubble, but rather line the edge on the springs? Does this work on all types of heads? Seems the tee square may not work on some? or use the opposit end. Also, cant you just explain the formula after the pic you just posted?

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Performance Only] #1524301
10/27/13 10:37 PM
10/27/13 10:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

In your picture, the bottom of the spring is not centered. doesn't that skew the math?





Seriously?????

From the original post:
Quote:

Be sure the square is resting on top of the rocker shaft and the blade is on the same angle as the valve stem.



The picture is a reference to show how to position the square to take the measurement. The spring is an outer from a triple setup that gives a clear view of the square resting against the spring without interference from the retainer. Obviously that spring won't locate on the spring step in the head. Do you really find that troubling or do you just like trying to bust my chops? I'm trying to find ways to help Mopar guys, not tear down others.


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Mopar-Al] #1524302
10/27/13 10:41 PM
10/27/13 10:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4 Offline
master
rowin4  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
I would think the bubble would have nothing to do with squaring things up as the head is on an angle on the engine, even on the bench. A better way to measure would be to have the spring off and square it up against the valve stem.


it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: rowin4] #1524303
10/27/13 10:48 PM
10/27/13 10:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Mopar-Al Offline
master
Mopar-Al  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Yeah, I pictured that in my head/what you said after I posted. If it wasn't so late, I'd go back in my shop and try this on my B1's, just to follow along.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Mopar-Al] #1524304
10/27/13 10:51 PM
10/27/13 10:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

So the tee square doesnt have to be in the bubble, but rather line the edge on the springs? Does this work on all types of heads? Seems the tee square may not work on some? or use the opposit end. Also, cant you just explain the formula after the pic you just posted?




Using the bubble level doesn't mean anything. The idea is to find how high the rocker shaft sits in relation to the valve tip and on the same plane.

This will work on all shaft mount systems provided the measurements are correct.

I could explain the formulas, but I reserve that for business use.


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: rowin4] #1524305
10/27/13 10:53 PM
10/27/13 10:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

I would think the bubble would have nothing to do with squaring things up as the head is on an angle on the engine, even on the bench. A better way to measure would be to have the spring off and square it up against the valve stem.




I used to use a pic doing just that, but some guys couldn't figure out how to get the measurement with the spring on the head. Go figure.


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524306
10/27/13 11:01 PM
10/27/13 11:01 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Mopar-Al Offline
master
Mopar-Al  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
As always, I am happy to answer questions. I like questions.



Even if I don't like your answers. I didn't realize you were acting as a top secret rocket scientist. I may not be able to say what I see or think, but I can see what needs to be done and do it. It's just math.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Mopar-Al] #1524307
10/27/13 11:17 PM
10/27/13 11:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,852
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,852
MI, usa
After reading a fair amount about rocker geometry. I settled on the theory that the center line of the rocker arm should be at a 90 degree angle to the valve stem at mid lift. What happens is when there is more valve lift the rocker pivot in relation to the valve tip needs to be moved down. It's simple math to figure it out.
Doug

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524308
10/27/13 11:26 PM
10/27/13 11:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Mike, How about us Magnum guys that are using rocker studs?


Fastest 300
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Mopar-Al] #1524309
10/27/13 11:32 PM
10/27/13 11:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

As always, I am happy to answer questions. I like questions.



Even if I don't like your answers. I didn't realize you were acting as a top secret rocket scientist. I may not be able to say what I see or think, but I can see what needs to be done and do it. It's just math.




No, I'm not a rocket scientist, but I do work very hard at what I do and I do it to help myself by helping others. You're right, it is just math, so if you can see what needs done, why did you ask for the formulas? And if you knew this was about the math, why didn't you step up and tell all those members, who still thought centering the roller on the valve was correct geometry, that they were wrong? And why didn't you explain it to them so they could clearly understand why it was wrong. Hmmmmmmmm?


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: Crizila] #1524310
10/27/13 11:38 PM
10/27/13 11:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

Mike, How about us Magnum guys that are using rocker studs?




The magnum guys have it easy, so to speak. You can correct geometry by altering the pushrod length, but drastic changes get dicey. You need to offset the rocker when large changes are made and that makes studs a real pain in the moon crease. (Or use rockers with a different fulcrum length)


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: dvw] #1524311
10/27/13 11:44 PM
10/27/13 11:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

After reading a fair amount about rocker geometry. I settled on the theory that the center line of the rocker arm should be at a 90 degree angle to the valve stem at mid lift. What happens is when there is more valve lift the rocker pivot in relation to the valve tip needs to be moved up. It's simple math to figure it out.
Doug




There's a little more to it than that. The valve is not on the same angle as the stand so it must be offset as well. Now how do you accomplish moving the shaft up without major surgery?


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: onig] #1524312
10/27/13 11:48 PM
10/27/13 11:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
B
B3RE Offline OP
mopar
B3RE  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
Quote:

Thanks Mike.

Onig




You're welcome, sir.


Mike Beachel

I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524313
10/28/13 12:45 AM
10/28/13 12:45 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Mopar-Al Offline
master
Mopar-Al  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
I guess you didnt read through my post all the way. So piss off. I dont play internet games. But I do help out the locals and friends with hands on. I thought maybe I could jot some things down that might help others. But I get this mental block when a jerk starts up with sarcasm. Just like this post won't be informative, it will be a kit forsale add.

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524314
10/28/13 07:32 AM
10/28/13 07:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,852
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,852
MI, usa
Quote:

Quote:

After reading a fair amount about rocker geometry. I settled on the theory that the center line of the rocker arm should be at a 90 degree angle to the valve stem at mid lift. What happens is when there is more valve lift the rocker pivot in relation to the valve tip needs to be moved up. It's simple math to figure it out.
Doug




There's a little more to it than that. The valve is not on the same angle as the stand so it must be offset as well. Now how do you accomplish moving the shaft up without major surgery?




That's a good question. You can shim the shaft. That will not address the shaft center line to valve stem dimension. In my case I have individual shaft T&D. I actually offset the rocker stand mounting holes in the head. The most common solution would be to mill the stands and replace them with blocks that have the rocker shaft hole in the right spot. Can you elaborate where your theory is on rocker to stem location?
Thanks Doug

Re: Rocker Geometry Measurements [Re: B3RE] #1524315
10/28/13 08:02 AM
10/28/13 08:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
P
Performance Only Offline
top fuel
Performance Only  Offline
top fuel
P

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
Quote:

Quote:

In your picture, the bottom of the spring is not centered. doesn't that skew the math?





Seriously?????

From the original post:
Quote:

Be sure the square is resting on top of the rocker shaft and the blade is on the same angle as the valve stem.



The picture is a reference to show how to position the square to take the measurement. The spring is an outer from a triple setup that gives a clear view of the square resting against the spring without interference from the retainer. Obviously that spring won't locate on the spring step in the head. Do you really find that troubling or do you just like trying to bust my chops? I'm trying to find ways to help Mopar guys, not tear down others.




Yes, there's a couple of things I find troubling. when you said;
Quote:

Be sure the square is resting on top of the rocker shaft and the blade is on the same angle as the valve stem. (See Photo)


Clearly the square is NOT on the same angle as the valve stem. If it was, the measurement would be different. If you're not careful enough to post a picture that shows things correctly, what other shortcuts will be next?
The other troubling thing is that your post is just a thinly veiled FOR SALE add to get people to call you and buy some kit. If you really wanted to help people you'd just post your formula so people can check to see if they have a problem. If they do, maybe they'll call you. Sorry, but your whole approach looks more like a snake oil salesman tactic as opposed to someone who's really trying to help.


machine shop owner and engine builder
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1