Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
340 6 pack intake porting??? #1486849
08/19/13 05:59 PM
08/19/13 05:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
I'm going to run a mopar 6 pack intake and was wondering if anyone has some tips, tricks, advise on modifying it to flow better. I'm going to gasket match it as deep as possible other than that not sure what else can be done. I know many have said its fine till around 5,500 rpm but then falls off fast, anyone have any real experience with one?? Thanks.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486850
08/19/13 06:25 PM
08/19/13 06:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
It's a good intake as-is, but a Six Pack is difficult to tune and set-up for optimum performance. Personally I would be afraid to do anything more than smoothing out any imperfections without a flow bench. I do tend to be rather cautious. You can make more HP with a properly tuned carb on a good 4 bbl intake.

Here is an old but interesting article on dynoed small block intakes.

Mopar Muscle Magazine small block intake article.

P.S.: Always look at the "area under the curve", not necessarily peak numbers, for best performance. (It would be easier to understand with a line graph as opposed to a numbers chart.)

Last edited by Locomotion; 08/19/13 06:39 PM.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486851
08/19/13 06:32 PM
08/19/13 06:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
340SHORTY Offline
Truck Nut
340SHORTY  Offline
Truck Nut

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
Mine is absolutely stock as it came out of the box on my warmed up 340. It will pull further in the RPM range higher than I am willing to rev it. Ive seen mine well above 5000 a few times tho. IMO your vale train may limit your RPM range more than the capabilities of a 6 pac...


I am truckless..
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: Locomotion] #1486852
08/20/13 11:47 AM
08/20/13 11:47 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

It's a good intake as-is, but a Six Pack is difficult to tune and set-up for optimum performance. Personally I would be afraid to do anything more than smoothing out any imperfections without a flow bench. I do tend to be rather cautious. You can make more HP with a properly tuned carb on a good 4 bbl intake.

Here is an old but interesting article on dynoed small block intakes.
Yes I have seen that before, the 6 pack doesn't do bad at all in the shoot out
Mopar Muscle Magazine small block intake article.

P.S.: Always look at the "area under the curve", not necessarily peak numbers, for best performance. (It would be easier to understand with a line graph as opposed to a numbers chart.)


yes seen that shoot out before the 6 pack does very well i think with slightly lean carbs

Last edited by ademon; 08/20/13 11:50 AM.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: 340SHORTY] #1486853
08/20/13 12:25 PM
08/20/13 12:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Mine is absolutely stock as it came out of the box on my warmed up 340. It will pull further in the RPM range higher than I am willing to rev it. Ive seen mine well above 5000 a few times tho. IMO your vale train may limit your RPM range more than the capabilities of a 6 pac...




I hit the shifter at 6400 w/o any issues, stock carbs and intake.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1486854
08/20/13 12:28 PM
08/20/13 12:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
superwrench Offline
master
superwrench  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
Quote:

Quote:

Mine is absolutely stock as it came out of the box on my warmed up 340. It will pull further in the RPM range higher than I am willing to rev it. Ive seen mine well above 5000 a few times tho. IMO your vale train may limit your RPM range more than the capabilities of a 6 pac...




I hit the shifter at 6400 w/o any issues, stock carbs and intake.




Me too!!

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: superwrench] #1486855
08/20/13 02:23 PM
08/20/13 02:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
This question belongs on the race page.

I believe that there are improvements to be made to the Six Pack intake, but would want a pro with particular experience to do the job.

R.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: dogdays] #1486856
08/20/13 02:35 PM
08/20/13 02:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
I shift at 6,400 also so that's why I want to get the most out of the intake. Maybe it does belong in the race section although I didn't think this was a hard core race question, I figured I would get the usual " single 4 bbl with a rpm or single plane would be better"

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486857
08/20/13 03:00 PM
08/20/13 03:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
RobX4406 Offline
I Live Here
RobX4406  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
If you want the 6 pack factor then go ahead, want it to run... run an air gap and a decent sized 4 bbl.

I bet if you put the same size CFM single 4 on the air gap as the 6 pack flows in the mag article, the differences would have been even wider. A DP carb instead of that Vac Avenger stuff would have mudholed the 6 pack even more throughout the range.

Don't know if you have a 400+ incher, but, stroker engines I've seen suffer even greater differences than in that article.

The big block intake is a different deal than the SB one...

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: RobX4406] #1486858
08/20/13 03:27 PM
08/20/13 03:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
yes kind of know all that, i run a holley strip dominator with a 750 race holley with annular boosters. its a 360 with about 400hp, will stroke it in the future but don't want to run faster than 11.50's not going to put the cage in the demon. this intake will have the mechanical DC carbs on it. just looking for something different than the single 4 bbl that 95% of the cars at the cruise and track have on them.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486859
08/20/13 03:32 PM
08/20/13 03:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486860
08/20/13 03:41 PM
08/20/13 03:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




I think the stock carbs out-flow the mechanicals. FWIW I'm pretty much under 11.50 (unless I blow the tires up) and haven't been asked to leave yet. They key is to put 12.0 @ 115 on your tech card. Usually the guy handing out slips isn't looking inside the car for a cage.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1486861
08/20/13 03:57 PM
08/20/13 03:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




I think the stock carbs out-flow the mechanicals. FWIW I'm pretty much under 11.50 (unless I blow the tires up) and haven't been asked to leave yet. They key is to put 12.0 @ 115 on your tech card. Usually the guy handing out slips isn't looking inside the car for a cage.


there rated at 1355cfm, i know when compared to 4bbl rating i think they are in the 975 cfm range same as the stock vacuum carbs. The manifold ports are quite a bit smaller than the gasket so at the very least i will gasket match them to the heads.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486862
08/20/13 04:08 PM
08/20/13 04:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
RobX4406 Offline
I Live Here
RobX4406  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: RobX4406] #1486863
08/20/13 05:22 PM
08/20/13 05:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.


well so be it!! It's a street car, like any street driven car it will spend 90% of the time under 4k, it will only see the track a few times a year so I'll live with it, and the better mileage. But if I want to pick up a few more tenths I'll toss my ported strip dominator on it, or my worked torker II, or the venerable LD340 I have laying around here somewhere LOL

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486864
08/20/13 05:29 PM
08/20/13 05:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,403
WASHINGTON, PA
1
11secaarcuda Offline
top fuel
11secaarcuda  Offline
top fuel
1

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,403
WASHINGTON, PA
I shift my AAR at 7000 and it has hit the rev limiter quite a few times set at 7500. My 340 six pack loves to rev. Best time 12.3 @ 109. It slows down if I shift it anywhere lower than 6600 rpms. It has also gone 11.90 with a small shot of nitrous through the 6 pack intake.

7821281-carlislecuda.jpg (132 downloads)

67 Dart GT 340 4 speed
70 AAR Cuda 408 6 barrel
96 Indy Ram original owner
2011 Hemi Durango
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486865
08/20/13 06:02 PM
08/20/13 06:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
RobX4406 Offline
I Live Here
RobX4406  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.


well so be it!! It's a street car, like any street driven car it will spend 90% of the time under 4k, it will only see the track a few times a year so I'll live with it, and the better mileage. But if I want to pick up a few more tenths I'll toss my ported strip dominator on it, or my worked torker II, or the venerable LD340 I have laying around here somewhere LOL




All good, run what you like is the best approach. That isn't always the max performance which is fine.

If 11.50 is you goal, that should not be hard to attain with a decent hooking 360/420-430hp.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: 11secaarcuda] #1486866
08/20/13 06:14 PM
08/20/13 06:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

I shift my AAR at 7000 and it has hit the rev limiter quite a few times set at 7500. My 340 six pack loves to rev. Best time 12.3 @ 109. It slows down if I shift it anywhere lower than 6600 rpms. It has also gone 11.90 with a small shot of nitrous through the 6 pack intake.


Nice! Is that the old Eddy intake or the Mopar? I thought I read somewhere that the intake hit a flat spot around 6,200 rpm but then made power again past that if pushed higher.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: RobX4406] #1486867
08/20/13 07:17 PM
08/20/13 07:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
superwrench Offline
master
superwrench  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.




Never say that.....I just ran 10.80's last weekend.
Everyone says that I'd run 10.60's with a good single plane and 4 bbl....not that I don't believe them, but why change when I'm having a blast making mine run quicker and quicker.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: RobX4406] #1486868
08/20/13 09:49 PM
08/20/13 09:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.




really? A 6-pack is a good all around unit that is capable of 10's if tuned right. Not to mention they get good MPG's when compaired to BIG 4bbls. If I can get my traction issues worked out I'll be 11.teens or better w/ a stock intake and carbs. Not sure an RPM and single Holley would do a ton better.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: superwrench] #1486869
08/20/13 09:55 PM
08/20/13 09:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,411
Omaha Ne
T
TJP Offline
I Live Here
TJP  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,411
Omaha Ne
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Im sure even with the stock 6 pack and carbs on top of a good 416" i will have no trouble seeing 11.50's and maybe quicker before they toss me out of the strip for no bar.




The 6 Pack will be an easy way to slow you down.




Never say that.....I just ran 10.80's last weekend.
Everyone says that I'd run 10.60's with a good single plane and 4 bbl....not that I don't believe them, but why change when I'm having a blast making mine run quicker and quicker.





Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: TJP] #1486870
08/20/13 10:21 PM
08/20/13 10:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
I know the bb intake is a good performer. Just not a lot of info or tips on the sb old eddy or the newer mopar.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: RobX4406] #1486871
08/21/13 12:25 AM
08/21/13 12:25 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
RobX4406 Offline
I Live Here
RobX4406  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
Quote:

The big block intake is a different deal than the SB one...




Which part of this did you big block guys that suffer from reading comprehension issues miss?


Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486872
08/21/13 12:13 PM
08/21/13 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Quote:

I think the stock carbs out-flow the mechanicals. FWIW I'm pretty much under 11.50 (unless I blow the tires up) and haven't been asked to leave yet. They key is to put 12.0 @ 115 on your tech card. Usually the guy handing out slips isn't looking inside the car for a cage.



The 4782/4783 mechanicals have exactly the same venturi diameter, booster and throttle bore diameter as the original carbs so obviously they would flow the same. Just because they look similar to the old Ford 3x2 don't assume they are the same. They are in fact much larger and are a nice upgrade on the Ford as well.

Quote:

there rated at 1355cfm, i know when compared to 4bbl rating i think they are in the 975 cfm range same as the stock vacuum carbs. The manifold ports are quite a bit smaller than the gasket so at the very least i will gasket match them to the heads.



As far as cfm goes there is much speculation about actual flow capability vs a large 4bbl. The old Mopar race manuals said that the outers flow 425 cfm and the center flows 295cfm. Not coincidently the outers have the same venturis and throttle bores as an 850 cfm double pumper and the center has the same as the primaries of a 590 cfm holley 4 barrel. So basically the six pack is an 850 cut in half with the front of a 590 put in the middle. 850+295=1145cfm.

Quote:

The big block intake is a different deal than the SB one...



I would have to agree with that. Probably neither one can take full advantage of the carbs cfm but the small block intake is certainly smaller than the bigblock.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486873
08/21/13 01:16 PM
08/21/13 01:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,569
Motor City
6
6PKRTSE Offline
master
6PKRTSE  Offline
master
6

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,569
Motor City
We just did a 416 (340 sixpack) engine. We sent the sixpack intake out to extrude hone. Engine made 580HP/550TQ on the dyno w a mild hyd/rlr cam.


1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute
1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack
1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi
1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL
1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383
1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440
1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4
2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4
2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486874
08/21/13 08:55 PM
08/21/13 08:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
Quote:

As far as cfm goes there is much speculation about actual flow capability vs a large 4bbl. The old Mopar race manuals said that the outers flow 425 cfm and the center flows 295cfm. Not coincidently the outers have the same venturis and throttle bores as an 850 cfm double pumper and the center has the same as the primaries of a 590 cfm holley 4 barrel. So basically the six pack is an 850 cut in half with the front of a 590 put in the middle. 850+295=1145cfm




You've missed some key aspects: 1) The boosters in the outboard carbs are different than an 850 (i.e. take up more space), 2) the throttle shafts are not slabbed like an 850 (again, taking up more cross sectional area in the throttle bore, and 3) the throttle plates are aluminum and considerably thicker than in an 850. There are notable differences between an 850 and the outboard carbs.

If the six pack carbs flow 1350 cfm @ 3.0" Hg, and the 850 @ 1.5" Hg, as stated by Holley, then the science and associated math is simple. The six pack will flow 955 cfm @ 1.5" Hg. The question in my mind is if Holley"s numbers are real.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486875
08/22/13 08:47 AM
08/22/13 08:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,403
WASHINGTON, PA
1
11secaarcuda Offline
top fuel
11secaarcuda  Offline
top fuel
1

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,403
WASHINGTON, PA
Quote:

Quote:

I shift my AAR at 7000 and it has hit the rev limiter quite a few times set at 7500. My 340 six pack loves to rev. Best time 12.3 @ 109. It slows down if I shift it anywhere lower than 6600 rpms. It has also gone 11.90 with a small shot of nitrous through the 6 pack intake.


Nice! Is that the old Eddy intake or the Mopar? I thought I read somewhere that the intake hit a flat spot around 6,200 rpm but then made power again past that if pushed higher.




Stock intake and stock carbs. Carbs tuned by me (modified the plates in the secondaries, lighter springs, and appropriate power valve). And yes, I did port match the intake manifold runners to the head ports, but just to match up (smoothly transition) the size of the ports from the intake manifold to the heads. By the way, my AAR ran slower when I put on an M1 and a single 4 barrel.


67 Dart GT 340 4 speed
70 AAR Cuda 408 6 barrel
96 Indy Ram original owner
2011 Hemi Durango
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: 11secaarcuda] #1486876
08/22/13 09:02 AM
08/22/13 09:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,103
Phila Pa
S
scatpacktom Offline
master
scatpacktom  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,103
Phila Pa
My Intake has been "deburred" and otherwise is stock. It has taken me to mid 11s on junk tires without any problems. Bolt one on and have fun.


Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: scatpacktom] #1486877
08/22/13 03:17 PM
08/22/13 03:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Ok guys,I'm going to gasket match and bolt it on. Here is a link to the mechanical 4782/83 for those who are curious. Thanks for the help.
http://www.ford6v.com/ford6vtech/ford6vtech.htm

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: BSB67] #1486878
08/22/13 06:01 PM
08/22/13 06:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

Quote:

As far as cfm goes there is much speculation about actual flow capability vs a large 4bbl. The old Mopar race manuals said that the outers flow 425 cfm and the center flows 295cfm. Not coincidently the outers have the same venturis and throttle bores as an 850 cfm double pumper and the center has the same as the primaries of a 590 cfm holley 4 barrel. So basically the six pack is an 850 cut in half with the front of a 590 put in the middle. 850+295=1145cfm




You've missed some key aspects: 1) The boosters in the outboard carbs are different than an 850 (i.e. take up more space), 2) the throttle shafts are not slabbed like an 850 (again, taking up more cross sectional area in the throttle bore, and 3) the throttle plates are aluminum and considerably thicker than in an 850. There are notable differences between an 850 and the outboard carbs.

If the six pack carbs flow 1350 cfm @ 3.0" Hg, and the 850 @ 1.5" Hg, as stated by Holley, then the science and associated math is simple. The six pack will flow 955 cfm @ 1.5" Hg. The question in my mind is if Holley"s numbers are real.


I looked at my outboard and it has down leg boosters the center carb has down leg but with the tube protruding into the center, the shafts are half, not sure if "slabbed" but there not the round type that the throttle plate sits between, the throttle is metal and only .038 thick. Looks like an old 800 and 850 dp I had .

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486879
08/22/13 08:55 PM
08/22/13 08:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As far as cfm goes there is much speculation about actual flow capability vs a large 4bbl. The old Mopar race manuals said that the outers flow 425 cfm and the center flows 295cfm. Not coincidently the outers have the same venturis and throttle bores as an 850 cfm double pumper and the center has the same as the primaries of a 590 cfm holley 4 barrel. So basically the six pack is an 850 cut in half with the front of a 590 put in the middle. 850+295=1145cfm




You've missed some key aspects: 1) The boosters in the outboard carbs are different than an 850 (i.e. take up more space), 2) the throttle shafts are not slabbed like an 850 (again, taking up more cross sectional area in the throttle bore, and 3) the throttle plates are aluminum and considerably thicker than in an 850. There are notable differences between an 850 and the outboard carbs.

If the six pack carbs flow 1350 cfm @ 3.0" Hg, and the 850 @ 1.5" Hg, as stated by Holley, then the science and associated math is simple. The six pack will flow 955 cfm @ 1.5" Hg. The question in my mind is if Holley"s numbers are real.


I looked at my outboard and it has down leg boosters the center carb has down leg but with the tube protruding into the center, the shafts are half, not sure if "slabbed" but there not the round type that the throttle plate sits between, the throttle is metal and only .038 thick. Looks like an old 800 and 850 dp I had .




Interesting. Mine are original 1969 carbs. The boosters are downleg, just larger than on my 4781-2, 850. I also have recently acquired from Holley assembled base plates and they also have the full diameter throttle shaft and thicker plates.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486880
08/22/13 09:12 PM
08/22/13 09:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Original carbs are not the same as the mechanicals in many ways. The 4783 mechanical outer carb does not have the thick throttle plates.
I'll have to remove the front carb from my car to compare the boosters and throttle shaft with a 4781 850dp. I'll be back shortly.


In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486881
08/22/13 09:45 PM
08/22/13 09:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
I measured the boosters and they are exactly the same.

Last edited by GomangoCuda; 08/22/13 09:52 PM.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486882
08/22/13 09:49 PM
08/22/13 09:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Exact same slabbed throttle shaft as 4781. The stamped numbers on the throttle plates are even the same.

I still believe that two 4783s equals one 4781. And then there's the matter of 300 more cfm stuffed in between them.

For those that don't know, the 4782/4783 mechanical carbs were not OEM on anything. They were available over the counter in the 1970's from both Holley and Mopar. They use side hung float bowls to get extra space for full metering blocks. Unlike the OEM carbs, the idle mixture is not adjustable on the outer carbs. Edelbrock supplied the linkage and a fuel log. The linkage and fuel log have not been available for decades and you have to make your own. Fuel lines are an adventure as they are on the wrong side and the front carb fitting interferes with the 70 and up aircleaner base. I had to make 3/8" spacers to raise the base up for clearance. The A12 aircleaner fits fine without spacers.

Last edited by GomangoCuda; 08/22/13 10:24 PM.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486883
08/22/13 10:31 PM
08/22/13 10:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
Quote:

Exact same slabbed throttle shaft as 4781. The stamped numbers on the throttle plates are even the same.

I still believe that two 4783s equals one 4781. And then there's the matter of 300 more cfm stuffed in between them.


thanks nice info! I know some of the ford stuff I have dug up seems to point to these flowing around a true 1150cfm. I plan on running without the choke plate and rod so add another 40cfm or so to that... LOL. Plan on working the intake, and rebuilding the carbs in the next few weeks hope to have it on and running by October .

Last edited by ademon; 08/22/13 10:36 PM.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: ademon] #1486884
08/22/13 10:59 PM
08/22/13 10:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 738
Columbus Ohio
M
mopfried Offline
super stock
mopfried  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 738
Columbus Ohio
I have a cast iron 6 pack intake and the aftermarket style carbs for a 440. I have been itching to try them out but Im sure I dont have the hood clearance on my 74 Scamp. Other than jetting would the carbs be the same for a small block? I never really knew the difference between bb and sb six pack carbs. Are rebuild kits still avaliable for the aftermarket carbs?

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486885
08/22/13 11:24 PM
08/22/13 11:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
Okay, got it. Not originals. I missed that part.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: mopfried] #1486886
08/22/13 11:28 PM
08/22/13 11:28 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline OP
master
ademon  Offline OP
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
4782/83 same for bb/sb, Holley just reissued the kit # 37-396. These carbs are kind of popular with the Ford guys also, there is a set on e-bag right now. from what I have been told shouldn't have to change jetting more than a few sizes for any size engine.

Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: mopfried] #1486887
08/22/13 11:34 PM
08/22/13 11:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda Offline
master
GomangoCuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,733
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
Quote:

Are rebuild kits still avaliable for the aftermarket carbs?




Yes. Holley, quickfuel, AED, BG all sell kits for 2300 carbs.

http://www.holley.com/37-396.asp

Last edited by GomangoCuda; 08/22/13 11:37 PM.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Re: 340 6 pack intake porting??? [Re: GomangoCuda] #1486888
08/23/13 08:30 AM
08/23/13 08:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 738
Columbus Ohio
M
mopfried Offline
super stock
mopfried  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 738
Columbus Ohio
thanks

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1