Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MIKES_DUSTER] #1348776
12/10/12 09:25 AM
12/10/12 09:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
You can do either buuuut, w/o a power adder it won't be as reliable and a SB would cost more than a BB. I'd do a 500ci boosted wedge.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: moparniac] #1348777
12/10/12 09:33 AM
12/10/12 09:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
A Gen III Hemi is an option, unless you want to stay with the more traditional look of either small or bigblock. With heads that easily flow 340 cfm air and 426 cubes not hard to build, not to mention a stock valve train that will handle some serious rpm, I would think it wouldn't be too tough to do. Top off the stroker with a dual four barrel setup for the nostalgia look, and put a modern overdrive trans behind it and it should be a real blast that will go anywhere and not have to stop every hundred miles for another drink of gas. That is basically my goal with the 65 Dart I am building. A decent driver with some snap, although I need to keep it very streetable for the Mrs so nines are not in the cards. (no cage, wants AC)
If you want all out torque, then in my book go all the way. 605 with B1 heads. If you have to buy the all parts, you might as well. That should put you down in the low nines with pump swill. Maybe even high eights with some light parts on the car and an all aluminum motor. On the street, to go nines a small block will have to turn more rpm, just because of engine size limitations. That gives the edge to the big block in a lot of ways.

Last edited by gregsdart; 12/10/12 09:34 AM.

8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: EvilB1Dart] #1348778
12/10/12 10:42 AM
12/10/12 10:42 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,189
aZLiViN
J
J_BODY Offline
I Live Here
J_BODY  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,189
aZLiViN
Quote:

Quote:

But Wes would have to actually drive his car to be able to tell you the dependability of it!

.....and I don't think I've seen a timeslip posted up....




Gets driven a lot, Jay. No need to post what I am or not doing.




....yer killin me Wes! I'll give you a shout when we're speedworld bound. Back to the 11's!

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MIKES_DUSTER] #1348779
12/10/12 11:11 AM
12/10/12 11:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,684
W. Kentucky
Mike what has your current set up ran?

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: J_BODY] #1348780
12/10/12 11:15 AM
12/10/12 11:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,334
Heaven
EvilB1Dart Offline
master
EvilB1Dart  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,334
Heaven
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

But Wes would have to actually drive his car to be able to tell you the dependability of it!

.....and I don't think I've seen a timeslip posted up....




Gets driven a lot, Jay. No need to post what I am or not doing.




....yer killin me Wes! I'll give you a shout when we're speedworld bound. Back to the 11's!




You know how I do! Hell yeah, let me know when you're coming down and I'll roll out to Speedworld bro. Take care......

Wes

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1348781
12/10/12 11:26 AM
12/10/12 11:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 288
no mans land
R
racerbychoice Offline
enthusiast
racerbychoice  Offline
enthusiast
R

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 288
no mans land
Quote:

You can do either buuuut, w/o a power adder it won't be as reliable and a SB would cost more than a BB. I'd do a 500ci boosted wedge.




mr. yuck,

what? i don't agree. how do you figure you can't build a reliable n/a sb or bb on pump gas for the street with the parts available today? its being done all the time. just because people aren't posting on this site doesn't mean mopars aren't out there doing it, because they are. its been proven you don't need a power adder to achieve whats being asked initially by the op. all the advice mikesduster has been given in this thread proves it can be done/has already been done n/a with either combo of choice, but its just gonna cost a little bit to get the needed results. just saying. dj

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: ksj] #1348782
12/10/12 11:37 AM
12/10/12 11:37 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

if you want to drive it anywhere then gear/tire size and converter needs to be part of your quest for mid 9s because there is no way I would have been able to deal with my car with anything more than a 3.55 gear during drag week



Ray.splurge for a GV and get rid of the 3.55s. That and a cage update.




I wouldnt run DW without a OD trans... can it be done...
sure but the OD sure helps to lower the rpm during
the drive.... I went with the 518 trans which cost
ALOT less than a GV and its a touch more OD.. then
I went with 4.10 gears

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: racerbychoice] #1348783
12/10/12 11:46 AM
12/10/12 11:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

You can do either buuuut, w/o a power adder it won't be as reliable and a SB would cost more than a BB. I'd do a 500ci boosted wedge.




mr. yuck,

what? i don't agree. how do you figure you can't build a reliable n/a sb or bb on pump gas for the street with the parts available today? its being done all the time. just because people aren't posting on this site doesn't mean mopars aren't out there doing it, because they are. its been proven you don't need a power adder to achieve whats being asked initially by the op. all the advice mikesduster has been given in this threads proves it can be done n/a with either combo of choice, but its just gonna cost a little bit to get the needed results. just saying. dj




to run mid 9's in a street car.. (I'm guessing not a tube chasis light weght car) you are going to need a ton of motor. You sound like it's easy as cake and cheap to build a 9 second car. It will take almost 700hp to make a 3000lb car run 9.50's. It will need big cubic inches, expensive heads, big solid roller cam (and everything that goes w/ one), 4500+ stall, tall gears, overdrive trans and so on. That equals big money and will be hard on parts. I wouldn't even try it w/ a SB. A Gen III hemi might work but that too would be easier to boost. W/ boost you don't need crazy parts, big cams, expensive valve train, and depending on the set-up you can run a fairly tame convert and gear. So I guess it depends on what you mean by driver. A boosted car will drive much better and have a longer/stronger power band. I guess it's just where you want to spend the cash. Neither will be cheap. If I had the cash It'd be boosted. (and my next build will) Just check out these new S/C'd 5.0L Mustangs. They run 10's in full street trim and get 25+mpg. Boost is the way to go.

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: moparniac] #1348784
12/10/12 01:00 PM
12/10/12 01:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines Offline
master
CompWedgeEngines  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
Quote:

my N/A BB runs decent for being raced on local 93 (3400lbs)






LMAO..!....nice 10.90 mph Sledgie...


RIP Monte Smith

Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.

WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MIKES_DUSTER] #1348785
12/10/12 01:10 PM
12/10/12 01:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Quote:

After talking with Wes( GREAT GUY!!!!!) about his 9 second true street car dart I got to thinking.

Can you build a mid 9 second,pump gas, N/A (No NOS,Turbo or Procharger) street car with a SB??? Wes's dart is EXACTLY what I want or turn my duster into someday. Mid 9's and drive it anyway with out much problems.


My junk went 9.79 on my first pass(w/new tires and fuel system)pretty easy leaving around 1500-2000r`s iirc and that`s 3200+ lbs and it was lean and the plug was hot(ngk#7)so after I take some weight out I can see my 9.59 @ 137+ pass coming next time out. Now, that`s on street legal VP-100 at the pump so maybe that doesn`t count.....kinda like E-85..... ANY motor type big or small can go fast BUT no one mentioned a sorted out chassis which in my opinion is equally as important as power....

Last edited by Thumperdart; 12/10/12 01:25 PM.

72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: CompWedgeEngines] #1348786
12/10/12 01:15 PM
12/10/12 01:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
M
moparniac Offline
master
moparniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
Quote:

Quote:

my N/A BB runs decent for being raced on local 93 (3400lbs)






LMAO..!....nice 10.90 mph Sledgie...




Yep! And it has a competition wedgie kit in it


Mopar Performance
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1348787
12/10/12 01:21 PM
12/10/12 01:21 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
S
sixpackgut Offline
Drag Week Mod Champion
sixpackgut  Offline
Drag Week Mod Champion
S

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

if you want to drive it anywhere then gear/tire size and converter needs to be part of your quest for mid 9s because there is no way I would have been able to deal with my car with anything more than a 3.55 gear during drag week



Ray.splurge for a GV and get rid of the 3.55s. That and a cage update.




I wouldnt run DW without a OD trans... can it be done...
sure but the OD sure helps to lower the rpm during
the drive.... I went with the 518 trans which cost
ALOT less than a GV and its a touch more OD.. then
I went with 4.10 gears





with the 3.55s, my car was running around 77mph at 3300rpms. under 3000 rpm the car didn't "feel" as good. I figured this was because that is where the multi spark stopped. I have always wondered if the multi spark was really worth it. with my timming turned way down, the A/F was on the rich side during Drag Week which I tried to lean the carbs out but when I put the timing back to where it would belong the A/F would be right on

moral of the story is I don't have high dollar anything in my car, with the timing turned way down, I still managed a 9.90 at 139 and my hood blew up and broke on that pass so I'm not sure it was a full pass.

If you look at the number of small blocks running mid 9s during Drag Week you will realize the number of cars was zero and their combos didn't look to economical to me


Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135
Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram

performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1348788
12/10/12 02:32 PM
12/10/12 02:32 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,746
Riverside, California
L
Lil Demon Offline
master
Lil Demon  Offline
master
L

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,746
Riverside, California
Quote:

to run mid 9's in a street car.. (I'm guessing not a tube chasis light weght car) you are going to need a ton of motor. You sound like it's easy as cake and cheap to build a 9 second car. It will take almost 700hp to make a 3000lb car run 9.50's. It will need big cubic inches, expensive heads, big solid roller cam (and everything that goes w/ one), 4500+ stall, tall gears, overdrive trans and so on. That equals big money and will be hard on parts. So I guess it depends on what you mean by driver. A boosted car will drive much better and have a longer/stronger power band. I guess it's just where you want to spend the cash. Neither will be cheap.




I agree. To run NA well into the 9s (not just good air, down hill, with a tail wind 9s) it is both challenging and expensive - otherwise everyone would be doing it. And what I mean by that is everyone with a timeslip - not a guy sitting in a parking lot at a cruise night saying he runs 9s.

To run 9s NA you are going to need hp, efficient converter, and compression - none of those like the street as they all build heat. Additionally, the only way to know if you are running 9s is to take it to a track, which means you have to pass tech for sub 9.99 - which means cage, license, and all of the other safety equipment that goes along with it.

My experience - street parts don't like the track, and track parts don't like the street. If you are trying to do both - then all you have is a series of compromises across the board.

Sixpackgut has done it with his Cuda, but I think Ray'd agree it wasn't cheap or easy - and has been a long time coming.

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: sixpackgut] #1348789
12/10/12 02:54 PM
12/10/12 02:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
with the 3.55s, my car was running around 77mph at 3300rpms. under 3000 rpm the car didn't "feel" as good. I figured this was because that is where the multi spark stopped. I have always wondered if the multi spark was really worth it. with my timming turned way down, the A/F was on the rich side during Drag Week which I tried to lean the carbs out but when I put the timing back to where it would belong the A/F would be right on

moral of the story is I don't have high dollar anything in my car, with the timing turned way down, I still managed a 9.90 at 139 and my hood blew up and broke on that pass so I'm not sure it was a full pass.

If you look at the number of small blocks running mid 9s during Drag Week you will realize the number of cars was zero and their combos didn't look to economical to me




When running with my buddy in his 52 PU we seen the
same thing... when running at about 80 the engine
ran smoother and got better mileage BUT what we figured
is that its getting more into the torque curve and
the response on the pedal was better due to the torque

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1348790
12/10/12 03:43 PM
12/10/12 03:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
O
one bad fish Offline
pro stock
one bad fish  Offline
pro stock
O

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
well its is simple it also depends on your engine builder not every one knows what there doing plain and simple put 4 the same price i could get a small block to run mid 9's on pump gas

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: one bad fish] #1348791
12/10/12 03:59 PM
12/10/12 03:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 781
MD
HEMI472 Offline
super stock
HEMI472  Offline
super stock

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 781
MD
Quote:

well its is simple it also depends on your engine builder not every one knows what there doing plain and simple put 4 the same price i could get a small block to run mid 9's on pump gas




one bad fish
what does your car run now?? what size is the motor???

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: moparniac] #1348792
12/10/12 07:35 PM
12/10/12 07:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,407
Ambridge, Pa.
R
rickraw Offline
top fuel
rickraw  Offline
top fuel
R

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,407
Ambridge, Pa.
i'm not quite in the mid 9's,(9.61@138), 440sb, w9's by ryan, 11-1 pump gas. i can drive anywhere.

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: rickraw] #1348793
12/10/12 08:04 PM
12/10/12 08:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,112
LONG ISLAND
fishy340 Offline
master
fishy340  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,112
LONG ISLAND
My sb went 9.58 at 140 w tti headers,4150 carb,3.91 gears w 5000 stall on sm tire and caltracs on 93 sunoco.If u want to go mid 9s yes its a pretty stout motor...but not like some suggests...#1 rule heads heads and heads without that u cant do jack. Indy,w5 or better will do it pretty easy if YOUR car is right. All n all 15.000 to 17.000 will getter done at 3000lbs.ps dont see many if any bb's driving around here doin it so i cant say its easy w a bb.

Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: fishy340] #1348794
12/10/12 08:22 PM
12/10/12 08:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Quote:

My sb went 9.58 at 140 w tti headers,4150 carb,3.91 gears w 5000 stall on sm tire and caltracs on 93 sunoco.If u want to go mid 9s yes its a pretty stout motor...but not like some suggests...#1 rule heads heads and heads without that u cant do jack. Indy,w5 or better will do it pretty easy if YOUR car is right. All n all 15.000 to 17.000 will getter done at 3000lbs.ps dont see many if any bb's driving around here doin it so i cant say its easy w a bb.


NICE............BB`s can do it easier in my opinion and if I had bought a good head instead of the rpm`s, I`d easily be there too........... Some of the ported smallblock heads make mine look weak so WHEN I step up to some 350-370cfm intake ports, the fun will begin...............


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: MID 9 SECOND "STREET CAR" N/A.....SB VS. BB???? [Re: MIKES_DUSTER] #1348795
12/10/12 08:31 PM
12/10/12 08:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 196
State College, Pennsylvania
F
fatman Offline
member
fatman  Offline
member
F

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 196
State College, Pennsylvania
I havn't tested since my engine upgrade, but old combo went best of 10.19@131 at 4060 lbs, 3.73 gear, pump gas. Dyno'd by RyanJ as run in car prior to uprade: 680tq/726hp. Now dyno says 740tq/856, but blows through the converter so I'll have to wait for Spring. Thing drives great on the 60 mile trip to BSD, and now I think Ryan hates Hemis a little less

Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1