Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: DblOJoe]
#1302923
09/12/12 04:51 PM
09/12/12 04:51 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
I would like to see some sort of Fuel mileage/consumption standard for engine dynos agreed upon. Some sort of load vs power vs time type of arrangement. J.Rob
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: RAMM]
#1302924
09/12/12 06:06 PM
09/12/12 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715 Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
|
Quote:
I would like to see some sort of Fuel mileage/consumption standard for engine dynos agreed upon. Some sort of load vs power vs time type of arrangement. J.Rob
you mean like BSFC?
It is the rate of fuel consumption divided by the power produced.
Joe
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: sr4440]
#1302926
09/12/12 10:56 PM
09/12/12 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300 Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
|
Quote:
Quote:
I would like to see some sort of Fuel mileage/consumption standard for engine dynos agreed upon. Some sort of load vs power vs time type of arrangement. J.Rob
you mean like BSFC?
It is the rate of fuel consumption divided by the power produced.
Joe
I think what J Rob is referring to is more for fuel efficiency testing. I tried figuring a good way to test my big block fuel mileage while towing while it was on the dyno. My biggest issue was knowing how far the throttle should be open for the test. I made several part throttle tuning pulls,but figuring mileage for something that pulls a heavy trailer is difficult. For comparing my engine/dyno to someone else's would be harder to do with fuel flow meter differences,in my opinion. Keith
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#1302927
09/13/12 12:14 AM
09/13/12 12:14 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 168 Washington State, USA
Winchester 73
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 168
Washington State, USA
|
Quote:
I would like to see a large bore, short stroke engine vs. a similar size smaller bore/ longer stroke setup.
I was always told that a large bore short stroke engine would surprise alot of people.
this has been done by a magazine a few years back -both motors ran the same within 1 hp
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: Winchester 73]
#1302929
09/13/12 12:37 AM
09/13/12 12:37 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300 Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
|
Quote:
it seems to me a lot of peaple get stuck iether not having budget for both good heads and roller valvetrain-witch is better?
heres a good one-how much is internal lbs really worth?will a lighter stock cast crank make more hpthan a heavier forged one?
I have wondered some of this myself. I know some guys do some extensive lightening for the gains it may get them. On the heads vs roller valvetrain,I think a lot of people would be surprised how little extra power they get with a roller can over a good flat tappet design. Until you get into more exotic engine and head designs,I think its minimal. Might make for a good comparison test. Keith
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1302930
09/13/12 01:27 AM
09/13/12 01:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266 Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
I too think a bob weight test would be cool.
might be tough to do without changing other variables though, piston design, rod length etc.
-Dustin 67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi 68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
Re: Ideas for testing,please
[Re: Dunnuck Racing]
#1302935
09/13/12 08:29 PM
09/13/12 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506 Az
Crizila
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
|
Not too much is ever said about flow consistancy between ports. I know the factory heads can be pretty bad some times. Port to port consistancy improvements comparing CNC ported heads verses hand ported heads would be interesting. Also how about running some HP numbers at different engine operating temps, Synthetic verses petrolium based oils, roller verses flat tappet cams.
Fastest 300
|
|
|
|
|