Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 #1266969
07/13/12 03:15 PM
07/13/12 03:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
S
sailboat Offline OP
member
sailboat  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
I have just rebuilt a 1970 340 engine to stock specifications. the engine is basically a 10:5-1 compression ratio. Challenger automatic with a 355 rear end.Is this engine fine to run on unleaded hi-test?

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266970
07/13/12 03:27 PM
07/13/12 03:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
Does it actually have 10.5 compression? Chrysler overrated ACTUAL compression ratios.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266971
07/13/12 04:21 PM
07/13/12 04:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
If you noted your deck height/head gasket thickness and a guestimate of your head CC's from what they're listed at in the charts you can figure your SCR then with your cam choice an estimate of the DCR & from that your octane needs. The period correct heads would not be unleaded compatible but depending on how hard your run it you can get by with unleaded for awhile but for how long I'm not sure. The open chambers/no quench is going to hurt (raise) the octane requirement EDIT If your close you can slow the timing somewhat to compensate but it will drastically hurt your performance

Last edited by RapidRobert; 07/13/12 04:50 PM.
Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266972
07/13/12 05:04 PM
07/13/12 05:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Yup it is, my 340 is a true 10.5-1 and it runs fine on 91 octane. It runs even better with a race gas mix but most of the time I'm burning 91.
Last night i filled it with some gas that was probably around 90 octane and I drove it today and it was fine. Not as good as last night before the fill up but it runs fine on 90. Now I do have aluminum eddie heads and KB 243 pistons.

I did run it on 91 octane when it had factory hi compression pistons and iron heads also for many years.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266973
07/13/12 05:30 PM
07/13/12 05:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,274
Ontario.Canada
C
can.al Offline
pro stock
can.al  Offline
pro stock
C

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,274
Ontario.Canada
..i thought a stock 340 was actually about 9.4.
the 10.5 rating allowed racers to build to 10.5 and be legal

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: can.al] #1266974
07/13/12 07:45 PM
07/13/12 07:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
If it is iron headed with a stock(ish) cam and has true 10.5:1 I would expect some difficulty. 9.5:1 would be a typical target for pump gas/iron head.

I guess it will like 100 octane. Tricks to help are cold air intake, slow timing curve and limit total mechanical advance. That may do it on pump gas.

If it is not "quench" now a thick head gasket can get compression down and help.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: Challenger 1] #1266975
07/13/12 10:11 PM
07/13/12 10:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
S
sailboat Offline OP
member
sailboat  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
The motor is in a challenger TA, 340 six pack. I wanted the engine put back to stock. The rebuilder told me that "stock" was pretty close to 10:5-1. Just wanted to make sure that this motor would be fine on pump gas and not be harmful to the engine.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: ahy] #1266976
07/13/12 10:14 PM
07/13/12 10:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
S
sailboat Offline OP
member
sailboat  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
canada
what would the difficulties be? Performance? Damage to the engine?

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266977
07/13/12 10:27 PM
07/13/12 10:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
L
LaRoy Engines Offline
mopar
LaRoy Engines  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
Quote:

The motor is in a challenger TA, 340 six pack. I wanted the engine put back to stock. The rebuilder told me that "stock" was pretty close to 10:5-1. Just wanted to make sure that this motor would be fine on pump gas and not be harmful to the engine.




Pretty close to huh? How close did he get it? You might be worrying for no reason.

So, what compression was the engine really built to and how was the compression ratio determined. Have him explain how he got 10.5:1. Deck height, piston type (part #, valve relief cc's) cylinder head cc volume, gasket thickness, bore and stroke?

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266978
07/13/12 10:32 PM
07/13/12 10:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
The main difficulty would be detonation/pinging which can seriously damage the engine over time. Bearings, main caps, head gasket ect.

Retarding ignition timing to compensate for detonation reduces performance. You are better off with an "appropriate" compression ratio and normal timing curve.

If you have the choice, I'd shoot for 9.5:1.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: LaRoy Engines] #1266979
07/14/12 12:38 AM
07/14/12 12:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

The motor is in a challenger TA, 340 six pack. I wanted the engine put back to stock. The rebuilder told me that "stock" was pretty close to 10:5-1. Just wanted to make sure that this motor would be fine on pump gas and not be harmful to the engine.




Pretty close to huh? How close did he get it? You might be worrying for no reason.

So, what compression was the engine really built to and how was the compression ratio determined. Have him explain how he got 10.5:1. Deck height, piston type (part #, valve relief cc's) cylinder head cc volume, gasket thickness, bore and stroke?




Without any actual specs on the engine build, any guesses of ours are worthless. Best I can suggest is start with pump 93, get it dialed in and see if you can go down from there without a ton of retuning.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #1266980
07/15/12 10:51 AM
07/15/12 10:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
A
AdamR Offline
master
AdamR  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
I would be scared of any engine builder that uses the words "pretty close"

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266981
07/15/12 12:00 PM
07/15/12 12:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
When I built my last 340 in 2007 I did CC the edlebrock open camber heads made for the earlier 340s. I don't remember the exact CCs but do remember the pistons were .029" above the deck and I'm sure I used the recomended felpro head gasket and I remember it being 10.3-1 to 10.4-1.

That sound right??

Stock bore, hand honed by me with a sunnen hone. Took quite a few weeks to get stock bore pistons. I've got over 12K miles on it now and did a compression test on it last fall and had a even 165psi on all 8 holes! It has never burned a drop of oil, I have never added oil between changes and I drove it 120 mph for miles at a time a few weeks ago at bonneville for the 2nd time, it's a real test on everything.


Come take a ride with me.

^^^^^^^^
Those pictures are on the way out to California, we stopped on the way back too and I beat the crap out of the car on the roads and on the salt. I didn't want to trash the car on the salt on the way out.
Just a tease as I couldn't hold my chessy camera and drive too.

Not every block needs to be bored, exspecially old rarer motors like a 340 if it's not absolutely necesary, I got lucky.

Last edited by Challenger 1; 07/15/12 02:00 PM.
Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: Challenger 1] #1266982
07/15/12 12:26 PM
07/15/12 12:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
Challenger 1 Offline
Too Many Posts
Challenger 1  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 28,312
Cincinnati, Ohio
And most people who think they are using 92-3 or even 94 pump octane are really using something closer to 91 octane.

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: Challenger 1] #1266983
07/15/12 09:02 PM
07/15/12 09:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,610
Not2farfromNashville, TN
R
Rug_Trucker Offline
I Live Here
Rug_Trucker  Offline
I Live Here
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,610
Not2farfromNashville, TN
If you are running ethanol blend you will need to jet up from stock.

My question is, got hardened seats?

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: sailboat] #1266984
07/15/12 09:34 PM
07/15/12 09:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
R
RSNOMO Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
RSNOMO  Offline
Moparts Torchbearer
R

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
Be a shame to dial-down a healthy 340...

Tickle it with some CAM2...

Re: fuel requirements for rebuilt 10:5- compression 340 [Re: RSNOMO] #1266985
07/15/12 09:50 PM
07/15/12 09:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
Your engine rebuilder should have brought up the gas requirements before the engine rebuild began. Or and least told you afterwards.

Ask him what the part number of the pistons he put in it were. Should be on your receipt.

From the sounds of things, it's a 99% chance the rebuilder used the thick Fel-Pro blue head gaskets that come in the gasket kit which will lower you "stock" compression anyway.

I say run pump 91 gas. If you hear it ping a little time it back a couple of degrees.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1